As much fun as it is to make fun of Hollywood liberals, I'm not going to join the pile on over the plane crash skit at the Emmy's that came hours after the real plane crash in Kentucky. It may have been less-than-desirable timing, but I don't see a need for conservative bloggers to create a whole controversy out of it -- that's what liberals are supposed to be for.
The Spectacle Blog
So CBS has engaged Uncle Walter to prop himself up in a chair and introduce Katie the Serious on her first night anchoring CBS Evening News next week. Nice to know she'll have a support group around her to make sure she survives all 22 minutes of broadcast time.
According to Drudge, CBS is promising a "who's who of Americana" to make a big splash. Who else could be among the hyperlib glitterati welcoming Katie? Hillary, for sure. Probably McCain as the token Republican. Will Jimmy Carter be on to flak his new book? How many of the usual suspects will join in? Maureen Dowd, Harry Reid, Barbra Streisand, Nancy Pelosi, and Ned Lamont all seem likely. One face you're sure to not see: Dan Rather won't be visible anywhere that night, unless it's on Hardball with Matthews. Let the games begin. I only wish it were tonight. This is going to be the greatest source of amusement we'll have until Hillary announces her presidential campaign.
Michael Totten, reporting from southern Israel, near Gaza, writes:
"How many rockets are hitting the city right now?" I said.
"Not as many today," he said. "Because of the war in Lebanon."
"What does Lebanon have to do with it?" I said.
"All the journalists forgot about us during the Lebanon war. So the terrorists are waiting for the media to come back before firing rockets again. They don't want to waste those they have."
"That can't be the only reason," I said. "The IDF has been active in Gaza this entire time. Surely that has something to do with it."
"Yes," he said. "Also because of the IDF."
Later two more Israelis repeated what Shika said about Hamas and Islamic Jihad cooling their rocket launchers while the media's attention was elsewhere. I haven't heard any official confirmation from either side that it's true.
A great article in yesterday's Washington Post described the internal debates in Israel over targeted killings of terrorists, specifically the conflict over risking Palestinian civilian casualties to kill terrorist leaders whose deaths would mean saving Israeli lives. The article focuses in on one specific incident in 2003, in which a "who's who" list of Hamas leaders (including current Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh) was meeting in one house. The dilemma? "A half-ton bomb wouldn't finish the job, the air force chief said. A one-ton bomb would blow out the neighboring apartment building, which was filled with dozens of families." Eventually, the Israelis found out that the curtains were closed on the top floor of the house, so they decided to take a chance that the leaders were meeting on that floor. They used a quarter-ton bomb to destroy only that floor, but it turned out that the terrorists were meeting on the ground level, and so the terrorists escaped.
For what it's worth, Robert Novak said on "Meet the Press" that he never reveals a source unless that source reveals himself, but added that he thinks it's time for his source to come forward.
David Corn and Michael Isikoff have a new book which confirms that Richard Armitage was the original Plame leaker. Close observers had already figured this out; Tom Maguire, for one, zeroed in on Armitage months ago. Maguire's most recent post on the topic, noting Armitage's (vague) association with the McCain campaign team, came just this Tuesday.
The corollary to this revelation has been equally clear all this time: Pace the anti-Bush storyline, the Plame kerfuffle was not a case of the White House intentionally blowing Plame's super-secret cover to attack her husband.
Our buddy Patrick Hynes weighed in today against Jim Antle and his piece on Mitt Romney by casting doubt on Romney's conservative bona fides -- just the sort of thing one might expect from someone now working for John McCain and evidently worried that Romney is outflanking McCain on the right.
To answer a few of Patrick's specific complaints: I would bet McCain is effectively more pro-choice than Romney these days, and that McCain's suppression of the First Amendment via McCain-Feingold incumbent protection dwarfs any of the coerciveness in Romney's health-care reform. As for who Romney is surrounding himself with -- the puny-minded article Patrick links to tells us nothing on that score -- I think a bigger worry should be McCain, whose current brain trust includes such conservative stalwarts as Colin Powell, Richard Armitage and Gerry Parsky.
But you know Patrick's really ready to throw mud for his man when he for all intents blames Romney for the recent Big Dig tragedy. I was wondering who'd be the first to take that route.
Ms.Alliott-Marie, the French Defense Ministress, has proclaimed a new French strategy for the Son of UNIFIL force the French are finally going to "man." According to that Wall St. Journal report, Ms. Minister said, ""I don't want to send men so that they can be humiliated on the ground." Which, since the death of Napoleon, has been the almost-unvaried situation of the French forces.
She also criticised those who are denigrating the French effort. Ma'am, we only aim to please.