Aaron Goldstein made mention of
the United States’ decision to withdraw funding from UNESCO, and
provided brief, but helpful context of our choppy history with this
specialized agency.
This admission sets an interesting precedent — and will
guarantee President Mahmoud Abbas’s efforts to seek international
recognition within other U.N. organs and before other international
bodies.
First of all, we should recognize this tactic for what it is. Of
course, President Abbas did not want UNESCO recognition to provide
much needed World Heritage funding to the Church of the Nativity in
Bethlehem. This crusade for international acknowledgement is merely
a thinly veiled campaign to cement Fatah’s political interests
leading up to impending presidential and parliamentary elections.
U.N. statehood was always a forlorn hope, but Abbas has bolstered
much needed domestic support before elections, set to be held
sometime before next May.
Hamas won a critical propaganda victory when they negotiated for
the return of 1,027 Palestinians for a single Israeli
soldier…hero that he is…and Abbas will need to keep pace. My
guess is that given his UNESCO success, he may try his luck with
other international organizations to match his rival’s recent PR
victory.
Secondly, we must recognize that this undertaking will
have significant policy ramifications for
the United States.
Obviously, it doesn’t really matter if Palestine wants to join
International Criminal Court — where the U.S. and Israel don’t
participate. But given the recent U.N. experience, there’s no
logical reason to assume Palestinians won’t be able to marshal
sufficient votes to be recognized at other U.N. agencies — such as
the nuclear watchdog International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) - or
financial organizations such as the World Trade Organization
(WTO).
To be clear, I stand
against these attempts to circumvent bilateral talks with
Israel. This is the wrong deal at the wrong time, for all parties
— the Palestinians, included. Likewise, I’m
cynical about our involvement in many international
institutions — especially the U.N.
However, I’m similarly uneasy about the potential forfeit of
America’s ability to help monitor nuclear proliferation in a state
like Iran, or our own financial interests to supervise and
liberalize world trade.
I sincerely hope Congress takes this into consideration before
the next Palestinian effort, rumored to
be at the World Health Organization (WHO).