Yesterday, Sen. Pat Toomey of Philadelphia asked Congressional
Budget Office director Douglas Elmendorf whether it was “completely
impossible to prove” that the stimulus created economic growth and
jobs. Elmendorf said, simply, “yes.”
Of course this is nothing new to those of us who’ve looked at
the kinds of studies the CBO performs to estimate how many jobs the
stimulus “created or save”; they rely on certain key assumptions
about the way the economy works and don’t measure actual data.
But it’s worth remembering, every time Obama or the Democrats
cite the CBO or other similar studies to brag about the stimulus
saving us from another Great Depression or creating a certain
number of jobs, that the CBO’s own director doesn’t have such
confidence in his numbers.
In addition to no proof for jobs created or saved, this
Obama-Administration testimony ALSO admitted at the end that
revenue-neutral tax reform would certainly lead to economic growth,
a broader tax base, more jobs/employment and greater government
revenues.
You got our attention on job creation/saving myths, but
completely ignored another key admission that undermines Obama's
PassThisJobsBillNow ClassWarfare campaign. How could you miss it
and not include in your headline?
bluecollarbytes| 10.27.11 @ 9:34AM
yeahbut, the stimulus 'nurtured' some jobs.
NotPropagandized| 10.27.11 @ 2:10PM
In addition to no proof for jobs created or saved, this Obama-Administration testimony ALSO admitted at the end that revenue-neutral tax reform would certainly lead to economic growth, a broader tax base, more jobs/employment and greater government revenues.
You got our attention on job creation/saving myths, but completely ignored another key admission that undermines Obama's PassThisJobsBillNow ClassWarfare campaign. How could you miss it and not include in your headline?
Anyway, good get. Thanks....
Stan Redmond| 10.27.11 @ 2:47PM
But The Won [pbuh] said otherwise. That's good enough for me.