A recent Congressional Budget Office report on inequality has been
drawing headlines for
finding that inequality is on the rise. Given the Occupy Wall
Street protests focused on the 1 percent vs. 99 percent narrative,
the paper couldn’t be more timely.
The report actually doesn’t contain much new information —
we’ve known for a while that many measures of inequality have been
rising — but it does contain a number of stark charts like this
one:

As I’ve argued
at length before, in many ways the rich are getting richer
while the middle class isn’t doing quite as well, but the way these
statistics are reported, including in this newest CBO report,
exaggerates the size and nature of the problem. For an interesting
and informed explanation of how the stats on inequality can be
misleading, I’d recommend this
Econtalk podcast with University of Chicago economist Bruce
Meyer. But I’d also recommend
this chart from
Political Calculations, which cuts to the heart of the matter
by showing the trend of the Gini Coefficient, a commonly-used
measure of inequality, for U.S. individuals over the period
1994-2010:

It’s totally flat, indicating no increase in inequality at all
over the past 15 years or so. The reason that it differs so
drastically from the CBO chart above is that it captures what’s
happened to individuals as opposed to households. Household
formation has changed significantly over the past 40 years, leading
to correspondingly large changed in measurements of incomes and
inequality at the household level.
Kingofthenet| 10.26.11 @ 2:34PM
Why the RICH are allowed to make most of their income from investments at such a low tax rate is a disgrace, Capital Gains need to be taxed as regular income NOW.
Odikhmantievich | 10.26.11 @ 4:25PM
True - the Gini coefficient hasn't changed much since 1994. But this doesn't really "cut to the matter" as (1) a rise in GDP under income inequality, with a flat coefficient, means the earnings are being distributed unevenly - in other words, inequality as a measure of distribution of total income may not be rising but it is enforcing itself; and (2) the coefficient rose rapidly between '79 and '09, so the time frame Political Calculations provides obscures the big-picture development. See: http://newsbatch.com/econ-newginihistus.html