March 1, 2013 | 4 comments
February 12, 2013 | 0 comments
August 14, 2012 | 18 comments
August 12, 2012 | 16 comments
August 11, 2012 | 13 comments
I don’t have a major problem with most of his arguments for the appropriate use of anonymous sources, though he takes the time to casually smear his subject again. “In Alaska,” McGinnis writes, “people refuse to speak on the record about Palin for fear of losing their livelihoods, and threats of violence.” Later he blames Palin and Glenn Beck for the fact he allegedly “received dozens of death threats and thousands of pieces of hate mail.”
However necessary anonymous sourcing sometimes is — I use it occasionally in my own journalism — the simple fact is readers are going to be suspicious of unsourced quotes. McGinnis’s problem is that he makes a lot of allegations that sound made up, raising questions as to whether he got “the story right.” The more damning a claim, the more substantiation it needs. Maybe he’s right that he needed anonymous quotes to uncover the real story, but if McGinnis thinks it is unreasonable that people are skeptical of book it is he who needs to get real. Readers who don’t already hate the Palins aren’t convinced.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online