Although Gov. Chris Christie has earned national attention for
adopting a tough stance against the demands of the union leaders,
particularly those who are attached to the New Jersey Education
Association (NJEA), the state faces steep climb back in the
direction of fiscal discipline. Today, my astute and resourceful
colleague F. Vincent Vernuccio, a labor policy counsel with the
Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) is set to unveil
a new report we co-authored about union power in the Garden
State. Steve Lonegan, the state director of Americans for
Prosperity (AFP), who commissioned the report, will also take part
in
today’s press conference in Trenton.
Up until recently, union bosses have cowed both major political
parties into accepting their demands. But with the state in the
midst of financial crisis the public has become attuned to lavish
collective bargaining agreements and public employee perks that are
not typically available in the private sector. We also call
attention to the continued perfidy of the New Jersey Supreme Court,
which has injected itself into tax and spending questions that
property belong within the purview of the state legislature. That’s
a whole story unto itself, which I have previously
covered for the American Spectator.
Vernuccio’s new WorkplaceChoice.org site ranks
New Jersey near the bottom of its Big Labor versus
Taxpayers Index. That’s why so many families continue to leave
the state, but the good news is that serious reform efforts have
traction like they never have before. Stay tuned.
martin j smith| 9.26.11 @ 2:50PM
An aggressive attitude to confront this problem would be needed. Justices who intrude in this sort of issue need to be confronted on their inappropriate behavior especially given the state's circumstances. That is my view as a voter.
william weiss| 9.28.11 @ 12:29AM
What information that seems not to be being made available is that only small persentage of union members recieve the "lavish" "perks" that may be part of NEGOTIATED legal contracts (AND MOST OF THESE MEMBERS CONTINUE ON INTO POLITICAL JOBS).
Many if not most of the terms of agreements between public unions and governments have been gained over decades. Not, all at once.
Each and every so called PERK had been negotiated into contracts as a means to correctly balance the payscale and company benifits that had been afforded to those working in the private sector.
Now that the tide has turned and public jobs seem to be more solid wtih better pay and benEfits perhaps it is time to even the playing field again.
But, please don't cast public union members as evil and selfish.
Also, the public unions have not drained the money from our gstate government in NJ.
Per legal agreements members pay into pensions systems, governments pay into the system and the monies are supposed to be kept seperate, invested and not be PILFERED by the government. This is what has happened in NJ and I'm sure in many other states where a system was established and government broke its own laws to srew it all up. JUST LIKE THEY TOOK ALL THE MONEY FROM "SECURE" SOCIAL SECURITY FUNDING!
Denise Loeffel| 9.28.11 @ 2:58AM
Mr. Lonegan, There are two sides to the public sector job issue and you are just concentrating on one side. Yes, a couple of the labor unions have been successful in getting their members outrageous perks over many years, but that has been to the detriment of several other public labor unions who have only garnered leftovers for other members of public sector employees. Why not tell the story of the public employees who historically get 0% to 2% raises over three and more years with give backs on their health and pension benefits. And the story of public sector administrators and department heads who don't belong to unions and are given 5 and more % raises after the majority of their employees receive cuts. The majority of public employees are at the low end of the payroll, are the employees who do 90% of the work, and are the ones suffering from the Governor's latest edicts the most. Many of the employees at the upper end of the payroll are barely being touched by the changes made to health and pension benefits as they are well able to afford the costs. Those employees who have been the ones to get the best perks are the ones whose unions play the political game the best and who political leaders depend on the most for votes, and that is why the state is overwhelmed with health benefit costs. Take away health benefits from non union employees, administrators, and elected officials and see how much costs reduce. Most public employees don't mind paying their fair share for health benefits, if their benefits don't keep getting cut. All public employees have always happily paid into their pensions, but the state hasn't paid into the pensions in years. Past Governors have raided the public sector pension accounts to pay for and buy other things and have given municipalities "time off" from paying their share into pensions. So, why don't YOU get fair and tell the whole story, because the rest of the politicians aren't.
yisong| 10.26.11 @ 3:54AM
precision grade high product material than the general precision grade product material properties more favorable. http://www.1stbearing.com