At this point it seems obvious that President Obama has no
intention of passing his “jobs bill.” First, he announced that the
$447 billion
bill would be paid for with $467 billion in mostly permanent
tax hikes on high earners. Not only is such a plan politically
laughable, given Republican control of the House, it’s economically
backward. Within the administration’s own Keynesian models, raising
taxes during a recession is a bad idea.
Second, the administration is now insisting that individual
measures in the bill can’t be passed separately. The bill has to be
taken as a whole. “We’re not in a negotiation to break up the
package. It’s not an a la carte menu,” David Axelrod
said this morning. Even though Obama thinks every part of the
bill would help the economy, he won’t allow Republicans to pass any
one measure they also support without also voting on the other
provisions. In other words, he’s saying, “take it or leave
it…and please please leave it.”
Obama’s goal is to get Republicans on record as rejecting or
blocking a “jobs bill” made up mostly of tax cuts and opposing tax
hikes on various unsympathetic groups. That would give Obama, a
little more than a year out from the election, the chance to
campaign on the message that Republicans refused to cut your taxes
because they were sheltering tax breaks for oil companies,
millionaires and billionaires, and so on.
But this is probably
another case of Obama being too clever by half. It might give
him a good talking point in the short run. The ongoing turmoil
caused by the recession, though, is the far greater challenge
facing his reelection campaign. Republican leadership has signaled
some willingness to work with him on parts of his jobs plan, and
some of them would help accelerate the economic recovery, or at
least provide some relief for people struggling to make ends meet
—
for instance, the payroll tax cut provisions. In lieu of major,
broad-based tax reform, there is plenty in the bill that could aid
real economic growth. Yet Obama seems content to place his
trust in political maneuvering and the ability of his campaign
organization to communicate a fairly convoluted message that
impugns Republicans.
Richard| 9.13.11 @ 11:59AM
He seems to be taking this approach because the only way he *can* run is to run against a do-nothing congress. He should be made to answer for the 14 bills that are currently pending in the Senate, held up by his cohort Harry Reid.
Conservative Bob| 9.13.11 @ 12:16PM
When he ran in '08 he had no executive experience.
2 1/2 years later he still doesn't... but his golf game has improved.
Amateur hour continues. Note to electorate hiring an inexperienced ideolog to lead the country is a very bad and risky idea.
Robbins Mitchell| 9.13.11 @ 1:29PM
What a hoot!....he's been blaming GW the last 3 yrs for his own stupidity,incompetence and failure...and now he wants to spend the next year blaming the House GOP for his stupidity,incompetence and failure....his chops need to be severely busted on this from now on
Real American| 9.13.11 @ 1:29PM
The House GOP should pass their own bill with one good idea from Obama's bill, include a bunch of stimulative rate and spending cuts, call it the American Jobs Act and dare the president and Senate Dems to oppose it.
Real American| 9.14.11 @ 3:37PM
I'm so smart. http://blog.heritage.org/2011/.....ama-delay/
JAWilson| 9.14.11 @ 7:01AM
I wonder who undercut Axelrod? That tool is part of the cabal that is Obama's brain, and I don't think that he's smart.