The best question of last night's debate may have come from
17-year-old Tyler Hinsley:
The key part: "out of every dollar that I earn, how much do you
think that I deserve to keep?"
Unfortunately, the only candidate who was allowed to address
this question was Jon Huntsman, who offered a few thoughts on tax
reform instead of responding.
What would be an ideal answer? Maybe something like: "You
deserve to keep every cent that you earn. The government
is only entitled to collect in taxes what it needs to
perform its legitimate functions as specified in the Constitution."
Followed, maybe, by a guess at what low, low percentage of income
would that would entail.
It would have been interesting to see Ron Paul field that
question. Huntsman wasn't really up to the task, and it's doubtful
that Romney or Perry would have been, either. Of plausible
presidential candidates, at this point only Mitch Daniels and,
especially, Paul Ryan have developed a message suitable for
answering a question like that. President Obama, for better or for
worse, stands in for the opposing view: you deserve whatever is
left over after we've taxed whatever the government needs to pay
for the societal priorities I've set for it."
Exactly the ultimate issue in a nutshell/ The money a citizen
has or earns is his except for what he willingly pays for
government he desires. That money, property after all, is not the
governments' except for what they allow us to keep. It as property
may not be taken without due process. When was the last time we had
that in the tax code?
Mike 3/505| 9.13.11 @ 2:50PM
This was indeed, the best question asked all night. It put point
on the difference between us good guys and the liberals, both
Democrats & RINOs.
Regards,
Mike
KH| 9.13.11 @ 3:07PM
Ron Paul thinks the income tax is slavery, that if we abolished
it we would still have governmental income equal to what our
government had in 1998, when it wasn't small, that it implies the
government owns you and your time and your labor and merely allows
you to keep a portion of your income as a sort of allowance.
I agree; I wish Ron Paul had gotten that question.
Al Adab| 9.13.11 @ 2:45PM
Exactly the ultimate issue in a nutshell/ The money a citizen has or earns is his except for what he willingly pays for government he desires. That money, property after all, is not the governments' except for what they allow us to keep. It as property may not be taken without due process. When was the last time we had that in the tax code?
Mike 3/505| 9.13.11 @ 2:50PM
This was indeed, the best question asked all night. It put point on the difference between us good guys and the liberals, both Democrats & RINOs.
Regards,
Mike
KH| 9.13.11 @ 3:07PM
Ron Paul thinks the income tax is slavery, that if we abolished it we would still have governmental income equal to what our government had in 1998, when it wasn't small, that it implies the government owns you and your time and your labor and merely allows you to keep a portion of your income as a sort of allowance.
I agree; I wish Ron Paul had gotten that question.