The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

The best question of last night's debate may have come from 17-year-old Tyler Hinsley: 

The key part: "out of every dollar that I earn, how much do you think that I deserve to keep?"

Unfortunately, the only candidate who was allowed to address this question was Jon Huntsman, who offered a few thoughts on tax reform instead of responding. 

What would be an ideal answer? Maybe something like: "You deserve to keep every cent that you earn. The government is only entitled to collect in taxes what it needs to perform its legitimate functions as specified in the Constitution." Followed, maybe, by a guess at what low, low percentage of income would that would entail. 

It would have been interesting to see Ron Paul field that question. Huntsman wasn't really up to the task, and it's doubtful that Romney or Perry would have been, either. Of plausible presidential candidates, at this point only Mitch Daniels and, especially, Paul Ryan have developed a message suitable for answering a question like that. President Obama, for better or for worse, stands in for the opposing view: you deserve whatever is left over after we've taxed whatever the government needs to pay for the societal priorities I've set for it." 

View all comments (3) | Leave a comment

Al Adab| 9.13.11 @ 2:45PM

Exactly the ultimate issue in a nutshell/ The money a citizen has or earns is his except for what he willingly pays for government he desires. That money, property after all, is not the governments' except for what they allow us to keep. It as property may not be taken without due process. When was the last time we had that in the tax code?

Mike 3/505| 9.13.11 @ 2:50PM

This was indeed, the best question asked all night. It put point on the difference between us good guys and the liberals, both Democrats & RINOs.

Regards,

Mike

KH| 9.13.11 @ 3:07PM

Ron Paul thinks the income tax is slavery, that if we abolished it we would still have governmental income equal to what our government had in 1998, when it wasn't small, that it implies the government owns you and your time and your labor and merely allows you to keep a portion of your income as a sort of allowance.

I agree; I wish Ron Paul had gotten that question.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Joseph Lawler

http://spectator.org/blog/2011/09/13/how-much-do-you-think-that-i-d

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT