Apparently David Axelrod was off-message this morning when
he
stated that the administration would refuse to push parts of
the “jobs bill” as individual measures. The Hill
reports that the White House has communicated that Obama would,
in fact, sign parts of the plan as standalone bills. “Senior
administration officials” explicitly told The Hill that
Obama would not veto the payroll tax cuts.
As I mentioned in my earlier post, opposing the payroll tax cuts
in order to make Republicans look bad would have been a losing
strategy for Obama. Cutting payroll taxes is a winner for
Obama, politically and substantively. The only downside for him is
that getting the tax cuts through a Republican house would give the
GOP at least one example of an issue on which they worked with
Obama, thereby seriously undercutting the campaign narrative that
Republicans are driven by mere obstructionism.
That said, there still remains the significant obstacle that
Obama wants to pay for the plan, or any part of the plan, with
giant tax hikes.
The Intermediary| 9.13.11 @ 6:08PM
What are these "giant tax hikes" you speak of?
SUSYQUE| 9.14.11 @ 8:39AM
For years, this is the first site I come to...the most important t reason is the BLOG. Hoping during holidays we get updates on the BLOG in these dire times of dealing with a dysfunctional government. There are times that you have double posting and that always puzzles me. However, I give this site an "A" and four ****s.