The latest CNN
poll provides more evidence that Michele Bachmann has been hurt
by Rick Perry's entry into the Republican presidential race. The
survey of Republicans nationally found Perry leading with 32
percent of the vote, followed by Mitt Romney at 21 percent, and Ron
Paul at 13 percent. Bachmann ties Newt Gingrich for fourth
at 7 percent, just a point ahead of Herman Cain at 6
percent.
If Sarah Palin gets in, Bachmann slides all the way down to
seventh place. Under that scenario, the poll found that 30 percent
of Republicans picked Perry, 18 percent Romney, 15 percent Palin,
12 percent Paul, Gingrich and Cain at 5 percent each, followed by
Bachmann at just 4 percent. That would put Bachmann, who pre-Perry
had moved into second place nationally and first place in Iowa,
only two points ahead of Rick Santorum and Jon Huntsman.
Other polls have shown similar, if somewhat less pronounced,
slippage. Bachmann will need to do well at the debate tonight to
stay afloat, assuming the moderators let her. She made some strong
points in the less debate when she rightly argued Obamacare can't
be repealed by executive order, but she was frequently ignored by
the questioners in favor of Perry and Romney.
The "debates" are a total sham. Instead of playing all these
ridiculous games, pitching Romney and Perry against each other,
ignoring everyone else, and basically writing a narrative script in
advance so they can keep the story going the way the media wants,
the debates should be organized more fairly and more
informatively.
They should come up a with a series of questions on the most
important issues of the election. Then simply ask each candidate
the same questions. Why is this not done? It would give everyone an
equal chance to explain comparable views on a straightforward set
of subjects. Oh wait, I answered my own question. The media doesn't
want there to be a straightforward comparison of candidates on
issues.
Casey Abell| 9.12.11 @ 2:20PM
"Other polls have shown similar, if somewhat less pronounced,
slippage. "
The slippage is pretty pronounced everywhere. The last three
polls in the RCP tracker - Fox News, ABC/WaPo and CNN - put
Bachmann at 4%, 6% and 4%. She's sliding fast toward
Huntsman-land.
Let's face it, Michele has gone nowhere but downhill since her
splash in the first debate. Goofy comments, weird pledges, a
glaringly weak record, and now Perry's entrance have just hammered
her.
She's loudly advertising her intent to attack Perry tonight. At
this point she pretty much has to let it rip to have any chance at
all.
Clint | 9.12.11 @ 2:24PM
Our Tea Party Candidate Michele Bachmann Is Said To Be Preparing
To Go After Perry On Social Security.
Interestingly, Our Other Tea Party Candidate Dr.Ron Paul Has
Spoken Out About Transitioning Out Of Social Security For Years,
While Respecting Older Contributors Contributions.
Sean| 9.12.11 @ 2:42PM
Bachmann isn't a liberal media favorite so she isn't being
pushed like some others. I am a Paul supporter and I think she has
been treated rather badly in the media. In the last debate it
seemed she got less time than Huntsman who is see polling at 1-2%
all the time.
CalMark| 9.12.11 @ 2:46PM
The obsessiveness and intensity of hatred for Bachmann is
disturbing, particularly on a website like this one. Antle leads
the charge.
OK, she's not doing as well as before--maybe. Suddenly CNN is
oracular, though? The Iowa Straw Poll was meaningless?
Anyway, Antle's judgment is suspect, especially about polls. He
crowed about Ron Paul "winning" the 2009 CPAC Straw Poll--as though
it wasn't rigged by swarms of Paulistas being bused in.
Trinacria| 9.12.11 @ 3:05PM
Intense hatred? I scrolled back and re-read the blog just to
make sure - Mr. Antle essentially conveys three brief and factual
points:
1) Ms. Bachmann appears to be slipping in the polls.
2) This appears to be a result of Mr. Perry's entry into the
race (as the start of the descent coincides with Mr. Perry's
entry); further declines might be expected with the entry of
another candidate who holds similar views to Mr. Bachmann (Ms.
Palin).
3) Ms. Bachmann will need to perform well in tonights debate to
sure up her poll numbers
Where's the hate? I don't see any reference to Mr. Bachmann
being an unfit candidate, without compelling ideas, or lacking in
experience or intellect. What I see is a recitation of indisputable
facts - are we now going to redefine hate as "reporting that which
is anything but effusive in praise for the candidate that I happen
to like"?
C'mon, sport - we've got enough professional victims in this
country (they're called liberals).
Lullabys, Legends and Lies| 9.12.11 @ 3:41PM
Tri: Ouch!! That last line hurt!! It was funny, and true, but
I'm sure it hurt nonetheless!! Although calling somebody a Liberal,
has become one of my own favorite insults in the last few years
too!! Nothing cuts as deeply!!
Now I'm not behind anybody yet, so I don't care where they are
in the polls at the moment, I'm just waiting for things to shake
out a little bit. So if Michele Bachmann is really fading, well
then, so be it, it was nice while it lasted!! Next!!
But this Rick Perry character? I'm not too sure about him yet at
all!! Everybody's jumping on his bandwagon now, but he supported Al
"Global Warming" Gore a little more than a decade ago right?
Seriously, WTF? He's got some explaining to do, before I can think
about climbing on board myself!! How can you go from Psycho Liberal
Gore, to trying to get the Republican nomination now? Explain
Please!!
Trinacria| 9.12.11 @ 3:43PM
Not sure I can explain it; perhaps he started taking his
medication...
Clint | 9.12.11 @ 4:22PM
We're hearing that Perry, is a salesman,who says & does
whatever he thinks will win with the particular electorate he's
campaigning to.
He's a Plastic RINO-CINO,Just like Mittens Romney.
We're bein' Played by The Ruling Elite & Their Media Flunkie
Stooges, ,just like we were Played the last time with John McCain
& Romney.
The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here .
Rise Up In Rebellion.
Trinacria| 9.12.11 @ 4:29PM
"Rise up in rebellion".
...so that a nuclear Iran can shoot us down.
Clint | 9.12.11 @ 4:51PM
That's so we can take back The Republic, Franklin gave us, if we
could keep it, Sport.
Trinacria| 9.12.11 @ 6:20PM
Ah, a grammarian! While I do so cherish the opportunity to
engage in a battle of wits, I must confess I find it rather
unsporting to do so when one's opponent is so helplessly
unarmed...Sport.
Now, do run along and join your playmates in that delightfully
cheery make-believe world where everyone will treat us nicely if we
simply pretend they're not a threat. The good Dr. Paul will see you
now...
Lullabys, Legends and Lies| 9.12.11 @ 6:41PM
And don't call me Sport, Buddy!!
And don't call me Buddy, Pal!!
And don't call me Pal, Friend!!
And don't call me Friend, Sport!!
Clint| 9.12.11 @ 9:41PM
You're another Pseudo-intellect Elitist School Marm ,who thinks
you're gonna lecture down to Us, The Great Unwashed.
Get Bent, Asshat.
The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here.
Rise Up In Rebellion.
Clint| 9.12.11 @ 9:43PM
The above snotty retort goes to Trina Cryer.
Thank You.
Trinacria| 9.12.11 @ 10:25PM
Really, Sport; this is the best you've got? Get bent, asshat?
Never before in the history of intellectual discourse has such a
brilliant argument been so exquisitely expressed. Profound, yet
simple (quite simple).
In your defense, I suppose I should give you due credit for
recognizing you were being talked down to. Well done
Trinacria| 9.12.11 @ 10:31PM
By the way, shall we be seeing each other at next week's MENSA
club meeting?
I know, cheap shot - turns out us pseudo intellectuals aren't
above sniping. Who knew?
PattyMor| 9.12.11 @ 2:47PM
I have been supporting Bachmann up til now. If she attacks Perry
over his Ponzi scheme comments about Social Security, then I am
done with supporting her. Everyone with a brain knows Social
Security is a giant ponzi scheme.
Wayne| 9.12.11 @ 4:17PM
If the GOP wants to figure out a way to lose in 2012, it just
has to continue its attack on medicare and social security. Neither
have anything to do with Obama and what he has done in the last 3
years. Don't use this as an attempt to correct 50 to 80 year old
mistakes. We have a 3 year old mistake to fix that demands full
attention. The Democrats are just praying the debate is about
medicare and social security. It is there only hope to win in
2012.
Clint | 9.12.11 @ 4:27PM
Yeah, The Arlen Specter-John McCain School of The Lesser Evil
has done nothin' but sold out Conservatism for Democrap Lite &
givin' us Tickets On The Loserville Trolley.
Bob| 9.12.11 @ 4:34PM
Michele can be a viable Presidential candidate in '16, but she
needs remedial lessons in US History/Geography starting at the
Nursery School level. Michele's kids can home school her, there is
a novel thought. As soon as Michele can find the Pacific Ocean on a
world map, knows Lexington & Concord is in Mass. and sings
happy birthday Elvis on his birthday she is a viable candidate and
who knows she may be nominated by the infantile GOP.
Clint | 9.12.11 @ 4:39PM
By then, Obama should be back in Kenya, selling Hut Owners
Insurance.
Trinacria| 9.12.11 @ 11:07PM
What are you, 12?
I fully understand that the constitution guarantees your right
to free speech; if you have nothing of substance to say, however,
perhaps you'd be well served by chosing not to exercise that
right.
In the spirit of candor, your posts aren't witty, they aren't
funny, and they make no meaningful contribution to the discourse.
In short, they're beneath the level of commentary one expects in
these pages. Pity.
Joe| 9.12.11 @ 2:13PM
The "debates" are a total sham. Instead of playing all these ridiculous games, pitching Romney and Perry against each other, ignoring everyone else, and basically writing a narrative script in advance so they can keep the story going the way the media wants, the debates should be organized more fairly and more informatively.
They should come up a with a series of questions on the most important issues of the election. Then simply ask each candidate the same questions. Why is this not done? It would give everyone an equal chance to explain comparable views on a straightforward set of subjects. Oh wait, I answered my own question. The media doesn't want there to be a straightforward comparison of candidates on issues.
Casey Abell| 9.12.11 @ 2:20PM
"Other polls have shown similar, if somewhat less pronounced, slippage. "
The slippage is pretty pronounced everywhere. The last three polls in the RCP tracker - Fox News, ABC/WaPo and CNN - put Bachmann at 4%, 6% and 4%. She's sliding fast toward Huntsman-land.
Let's face it, Michele has gone nowhere but downhill since her splash in the first debate. Goofy comments, weird pledges, a glaringly weak record, and now Perry's entrance have just hammered her.
She's loudly advertising her intent to attack Perry tonight. At this point she pretty much has to let it rip to have any chance at all.
Clint | 9.12.11 @ 2:24PM
Our Tea Party Candidate Michele Bachmann Is Said To Be Preparing To Go After Perry On Social Security.
Interestingly, Our Other Tea Party Candidate Dr.Ron Paul Has Spoken Out About Transitioning Out Of Social Security For Years, While Respecting Older Contributors Contributions.
Sean| 9.12.11 @ 2:42PM
Bachmann isn't a liberal media favorite so she isn't being pushed like some others. I am a Paul supporter and I think she has been treated rather badly in the media. In the last debate it seemed she got less time than Huntsman who is see polling at 1-2% all the time.
CalMark| 9.12.11 @ 2:46PM
The obsessiveness and intensity of hatred for Bachmann is disturbing, particularly on a website like this one. Antle leads the charge.
OK, she's not doing as well as before--maybe. Suddenly CNN is oracular, though? The Iowa Straw Poll was meaningless?
Anyway, Antle's judgment is suspect, especially about polls. He crowed about Ron Paul "winning" the 2009 CPAC Straw Poll--as though it wasn't rigged by swarms of Paulistas being bused in.
Trinacria| 9.12.11 @ 3:05PM
Intense hatred? I scrolled back and re-read the blog just to make sure - Mr. Antle essentially conveys three brief and factual points:
1) Ms. Bachmann appears to be slipping in the polls.
2) This appears to be a result of Mr. Perry's entry into the race (as the start of the descent coincides with Mr. Perry's entry); further declines might be expected with the entry of another candidate who holds similar views to Mr. Bachmann (Ms. Palin).
3) Ms. Bachmann will need to perform well in tonights debate to sure up her poll numbers
Where's the hate? I don't see any reference to Mr. Bachmann being an unfit candidate, without compelling ideas, or lacking in experience or intellect. What I see is a recitation of indisputable facts - are we now going to redefine hate as "reporting that which is anything but effusive in praise for the candidate that I happen to like"?
C'mon, sport - we've got enough professional victims in this country (they're called liberals).
Lullabys, Legends and Lies| 9.12.11 @ 3:41PM
Tri: Ouch!! That last line hurt!! It was funny, and true, but I'm sure it hurt nonetheless!! Although calling somebody a Liberal, has become one of my own favorite insults in the last few years too!! Nothing cuts as deeply!!
Now I'm not behind anybody yet, so I don't care where they are in the polls at the moment, I'm just waiting for things to shake out a little bit. So if Michele Bachmann is really fading, well then, so be it, it was nice while it lasted!! Next!!
But this Rick Perry character? I'm not too sure about him yet at all!! Everybody's jumping on his bandwagon now, but he supported Al "Global Warming" Gore a little more than a decade ago right? Seriously, WTF? He's got some explaining to do, before I can think about climbing on board myself!! How can you go from Psycho Liberal Gore, to trying to get the Republican nomination now? Explain Please!!
Trinacria| 9.12.11 @ 3:43PM
Not sure I can explain it; perhaps he started taking his medication...
Clint | 9.12.11 @ 4:22PM
We're hearing that Perry, is a salesman,who says & does whatever he thinks will win with the particular electorate he's campaigning to.
He's a Plastic RINO-CINO,Just like Mittens Romney.
We're bein' Played by The Ruling Elite & Their Media Flunkie Stooges, ,just like we were Played the last time with John McCain & Romney.
The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here .
Rise Up In Rebellion.
Trinacria| 9.12.11 @ 4:29PM
"Rise up in rebellion".
...so that a nuclear Iran can shoot us down.
Clint | 9.12.11 @ 4:51PM
That's so we can take back The Republic, Franklin gave us, if we could keep it, Sport.
Trinacria| 9.12.11 @ 6:20PM
Ah, a grammarian! While I do so cherish the opportunity to engage in a battle of wits, I must confess I find it rather unsporting to do so when one's opponent is so helplessly unarmed...Sport.
Now, do run along and join your playmates in that delightfully cheery make-believe world where everyone will treat us nicely if we simply pretend they're not a threat. The good Dr. Paul will see you now...
Lullabys, Legends and Lies| 9.12.11 @ 6:41PM
And don't call me Sport, Buddy!!
And don't call me Buddy, Pal!!
And don't call me Pal, Friend!!
And don't call me Friend, Sport!!
Clint| 9.12.11 @ 9:41PM
You're another Pseudo-intellect Elitist School Marm ,who thinks you're gonna lecture down to Us, The Great Unwashed.
Get Bent, Asshat.
The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here.
Rise Up In Rebellion.
Clint| 9.12.11 @ 9:43PM
The above snotty retort goes to Trina Cryer.
Thank You.
Trinacria| 9.12.11 @ 10:25PM
Really, Sport; this is the best you've got? Get bent, asshat? Never before in the history of intellectual discourse has such a brilliant argument been so exquisitely expressed. Profound, yet simple (quite simple).
In your defense, I suppose I should give you due credit for recognizing you were being talked down to. Well done
Trinacria| 9.12.11 @ 10:31PM
By the way, shall we be seeing each other at next week's MENSA club meeting?
I know, cheap shot - turns out us pseudo intellectuals aren't above sniping. Who knew?
PattyMor| 9.12.11 @ 2:47PM
I have been supporting Bachmann up til now. If she attacks Perry over his Ponzi scheme comments about Social Security, then I am done with supporting her. Everyone with a brain knows Social Security is a giant ponzi scheme.
Wayne| 9.12.11 @ 4:17PM
If the GOP wants to figure out a way to lose in 2012, it just has to continue its attack on medicare and social security. Neither have anything to do with Obama and what he has done in the last 3 years. Don't use this as an attempt to correct 50 to 80 year old mistakes. We have a 3 year old mistake to fix that demands full attention. The Democrats are just praying the debate is about medicare and social security. It is there only hope to win in 2012.
Clint | 9.12.11 @ 4:27PM
Yeah, The Arlen Specter-John McCain School of The Lesser Evil has done nothin' but sold out Conservatism for Democrap Lite & givin' us Tickets On The Loserville Trolley.
Bob| 9.12.11 @ 4:34PM
Michele can be a viable Presidential candidate in '16, but she needs remedial lessons in US History/Geography starting at the Nursery School level. Michele's kids can home school her, there is a novel thought. As soon as Michele can find the Pacific Ocean on a world map, knows Lexington & Concord is in Mass. and sings happy birthday Elvis on his birthday she is a viable candidate and who knows she may be nominated by the infantile GOP.
Clint | 9.12.11 @ 4:39PM
By then, Obama should be back in Kenya, selling Hut Owners Insurance.
Trinacria| 9.12.11 @ 11:07PM
What are you, 12?
I fully understand that the constitution guarantees your right to free speech; if you have nothing of substance to say, however, perhaps you'd be well served by chosing not to exercise that right.
In the spirit of candor, your posts aren't witty, they aren't funny, and they make no meaningful contribution to the discourse. In short, they're beneath the level of commentary one expects in these pages. Pity.