So, Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats no longer think that
stimulus is a helpful word to use, and are
quietly retiring it from their vocabulary.
It's interesting. The word stimulus denotes
something that kicks off a larger action, like a spur digging into
a horse's flesh to cause it to gallop.
In 2009, when the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was
debated and passed, the Obama team and the Democrats tried to sell
the bill by using similar metaphors, e.g., that it would "prime the
pump" of the economy, or "kickstart" the jobs engine.
Two years later, the metaphors are gone,
and stimulus is a "radioactive word,"
according toThe Hill. Now, when Democrats want to
defend the stimulus, they skip the metaphors and instead make the
unfalsifiable claim that the country would have lurched into
another Great Depression without the stimulus, and that we should
be thankful to the stimulus for the economic growth that we do
have. They abandoned the idea that the stimulus could stimulate the
economy long ago.
Update:
That article from The Hill also includes this
Democratic talking points Mad Libs from Rep. George Miller of
California:
"We have tried shrinking the economy and sowing economic
uncertainty for 8 months now, and it has failed. It's time for job
creation and economic growth as our first order of business to
strengthen our middle class."
My response: we haven't shrunk the economy enough.
Congress should have tried to decrease GDP by $1.5
trillion.
Neptunus Lex spells it "stimuless." A good, and accurate, way of
expressing it.
Occam's Tool| 9.6.11 @ 6:46PM
It's still moronic. Want a Stimulus? Give a 20 year Reagan era
tax setup. That should have been Stimulus I, and we would have been
out of the mess we're in.
Quartermaster| 9.6.11 @ 5:52PM
Neptunus Lex spells it "stimuless." A good, and accurate, way of expressing it.
Occam's Tool| 9.6.11 @ 6:46PM
It's still moronic. Want a Stimulus? Give a 20 year Reagan era tax setup. That should have been Stimulus I, and we would have been out of the mess we're in.