The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

So, Obama’s Friday-before-Labor-Day news-dump was a politically panicked, long overdue if temporary walkback of a proposed $1 trillion dollar rule out of EPA — just one of a suite of assaults on jobs known collectively, colloquially as the ‘train wreck”.

I see Jim Tankersley’s tweet letting us in on the White House’s effort to spin the obvious about Obama dropping his purely discretionary, gratuitous gift to the anti-energy green lobby until 2013 — when the statute requires a review — as not really being an admission that their theory of costly rules create jobs is bunkum:

Obama: ozone rule due in ‘13: “I did not support asking state & local govs to begin implementing a new standard that will soon be reconsdrd”

OK. So. It just now occurred to EPA that this was their timeline?

Oh, well, no, in fact EPA recognized and defended all along proceeding gratuitously despite this same timeline.

But, given what this spin at least inadvertently admits in an attempt to avoid admitting even more, let’s look at the cost of this mismanaged effort, of his having imposed just the sort of wasteful bureaucratic redundancy which he says here is costly and not helpful to good governance (don’t want to put words in his mouth but isn’t that the implication of avoiding more, going forward?)

What has it cost us all, this past 20 months of EPA wasting taxpayer money because they looked at the calendar but apparently didn’t really look at the calendar? Also requiring the productive sector of the economy to spend huge sums responding and delay investment decisions, maybe even move elsewhere?

I’d be interested in estimated costs to the taxpayer, and to industry, to the economy of the now effectively acknowledged political bumble by the Obama administration which commenced as a sop to their anti-energy ‘green’ base in January 2010. 20 months of this wasteful indirect tax on the economy.

20 months of bureaucratic process and of the need to hire lawyers to address it. Bad, hyperpartisan government is costly. Even when it’s not inept. What did this stunt cost?

View all comments (8) |

SpiralArchitect| 9.2.11 @ 6:40PM

The few actions & many attempted actions the POTUS strives for are all from the same proven failed theories & ideologies he so dearly relishes.

Progressive Bob| 9.2.11 @ 7:19PM

This is exactly why I will be supporting Ralph Nader in 2012. I have seen one after another of my closest held views spit on by this administration. I could have got this by voting for McCain.

Wayne | 9.5.11 @ 9:46AM

Keep it up!

Cassandra| 9.3.11 @ 1:31AM

This careless and arrogant 'toying' with the hard earned money of Americans in pursuit of that idiotic 'green agenda' makes me furious! Gallingly they pretend (& too many people fall for the deception) - that they are concerned for our environment! Useful idiots (like Progressive Bob) are taken in by these AGW theories. Bob, it's about power and pushing the radical Socialist agenda. Therefore Obama's little temporary 'retreat' in this EPA stunt is a minor political maneuver that is not even remotely connected to the environment!!!
I can't wait for him to be gone! Leave America alone - please!! BHO and his minions are the real polluters of this nation!

Tenn Slim| 9.5.11 @ 8:09AM

Hardly able to interpret the article but....
The EPA's imposition, (almost) of this set of rules cost the US GNP a "Slowdown" in terms of actualy acting on creating, hiring or moving in any direction during the summer of 2011. If not for the Net, the Bloggers, and the Watchers of Obama, the EPA would have slid this rule into effect this Fall. THEN the Cloward Piven movement would have recieved a real boost.
Unfortunatley, for the EPA, the word got out, was spread and finaly, the Private sector woke up.
KUDOS>

Wayne | 9.5.11 @ 9:44AM

We do not need an EPA, FDA, DOE, or other department of the federal government telling us what to do. What they do is drive businesses out of the country and kill jobs.

Occam's Tool| 9.5.11 @ 6:32PM

We need our agencies cut back to Defense, Treasury, Interior, State. Everything necessary should be a subdivision. Most isn't.

yisong| 10.27.11 @ 9:44PM

compact in design,and light in weight.The balls contact with the circular race at four points,via which the axial force,radial force and resultant moment may be born simultaneously. http://www.1stbearing.com

More Blog Posts by Chris Horner

http://spectator.org/blog/2011/09/02/what-did-obamas-epa-stunt-cost

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

From the Obama Ministry of Truth

Ben Stein | 5.21.13

IRS Union Chief Stonewalls

Jeffrey Lord | 5.21.13

Wimps Versus Barbarians

Thomas Sowell | 5.21.13

Damage Control for Dummies

Matt Purple | 5.22.13

Anyone Still Believe Me?

Aaron Goldstein | 5.21.13

ADVERTISEMENT