NPR has just done it again.
National Public Radio is, of course, famous for being
funded in part by the federal government.
In the episode that was the disgraceful firing and
treatment of Juan Williams, now a Fox commentator (whose new book
Muzzled: The Assault on Honest Debate details
the whole sordid affair) there were moves to cut off NPR’s
government money, countered by the usual pleas from supporters
(including the Obama White House) not to do so.
The NPR funding story took a new twist today thanks to
Mitt Romney’s run-in with left-wing hecklers yesterday in
Iowa.
Romney was campaigning yesterday in the run-up to last
night’s debate. As seen
here courtesy of Fox cameras, he was abruptly
challenged by a small but noisy group of left-wing
hecklers
In an unscripted move that reminded of Ronald Reagan’s
dramatic “I paid for this microphone” moment in a 1980 New
Hampshire debate, Romney declared he would refuse to raise taxes.
This led to the following quick exchange:
Liberal Protestor: “Tax
corporations!”
Romney: “Corporations are people, my
friend.”
The governor then turned to the audience and asked if they
wanted taxes raised, which was greeted with a loud chorus of
boos.
Before the afternoon was out, NPR was jumping on Romney,
running
this story from reporter Frank James
headlined:
Romney’s ‘Corporations Are People’ A
Gift To Political Foes
The story said that Romney, whom all the world knows made
his success in the business world:
gave his Democratic opponents an early Christmas gift by
uttering those words. He just made their goal of pushing the
narrative that he is a tool of corporate America much easier by
providing them with that handy piece of video…. Liz Halloran of NPR
was in the crowd at the state fair for Romney’s “corporations are
people” line.
“Not his best moment,” she tells us.
The story also said:
These words could haunt him all the way to Election Day if he
becomes the nominee. They could follow him the way President
Obama’s line about rural folks clinging to their guns and religion
tagged along behind the Democrat.
Well. So Mitt Romney is a “tool” of corporate America, is
he?
On November 6, 2003, NPR accepted a grant of over $225
million from the estate of the late Joan Kroc. Kroc, of course, was
famous as the wife of Ray Kroc — the founder of McDonald’s. Joan
Kroc had no independent wealth of her own. History records that she
met her future (and already married) husband when he walked into a
bar where she was the piano player. They hit it off and the rest,
as they might say, was history.
The point, of course, is that Joan Kroc’s ability to leave
behind over $235 million for NPR is precisely because of the
corporation formally known as McDonald’s Corporation. And sure
enough, just as Mitt Romney said, McDonald’s turns out to be filled
with people. Specifically:
• McDonald’s employs 1.7 million people with
private sector jobs
• McDonald’s has 33,000 outlets in 118
countries where those 1.7 million people have those jobs
• McDonald’s, as described
here by the company, provides health care for its
employees.
So. What does this illustrate?
That quite aside from the issue of government funding, NPR
itself exists as the result of corporate funding. Says
NPR of how it gets its money:
NPR’s revenue comes primarily from fees paid by our member
stations, contributions from corporate sponsors,
institutional foundation grants, gifts from major donors, and fees
paid by users of The Public Radio Satellite System.
And sources like foundations — the Ford Foundation, for
example — got their money from the success of corporations. No
Ford Motor Company — no money for Edsel Ford to set up the Ford
Foundation.
Mitt Romney did well in that debate last night.
But in an unscripted moment yesterday afternoon he threw
down a gauntlet to an American left whose ideas of statist job
creation have failed utterly – with 25 million now unemployed
precisely as Romney said.
NPR, literally on the air by its own admission because it
takes corporate money, is now insisting corporations and the jobs
they create will be an issue in this campaign.
Giving Romney and any other conservative out there a
priceless opportunity to make Obamanomics the central issue of
2012.
If NPR has such a dim view of corporations, will they stop
taking corporate money?
JimH| 8.12.11 @ 11:23AM
The corporation was created to limit an investor’s liability to the amount invested. It is a wonderful invention for capital formation. However, with such diffuse ownership, oversight can be lax and it is difficult to pin down responsibility for corporate actions. The quasi-personhood of a corporation in law does not always work. You can’t send General Motors to jail. I do not have any answers, but I would love to see what sort of market based solutions people can come up with.
ncatty| 8.12.11 @ 12:10PM
Reagan wouldn't have said "Corporations are people." He would have said "Corporations employ people." Romney ain't Reagan.
mrmalmalama| 8.12.11 @ 12:20PM
This attack on Romney won't amount to anything. Just like he explained taxing corporations is taxing people. Which means less growth, dividends, and available resources for the people investing in corporations.
crazy| 8.12.11 @ 12:32PM
Romney's "macaca" moment. Arguing with hecklers will work as well for him as arguing with a tracker did for George Allen. Humor, patience and respect are for more useful tools for a leader. Who needs another prickly, temperamental, I'm talking here, President? Don't we have one of those already?
Clint| 8.12.11 @ 1:03PM
Follow The Money Trail.
Conservative Bob| 8.12.11 @ 1:07PM
Not to worry Mit will begin to fad soon... without regard to corporations or paid hecklers.
Mike 3/505| 8.12.11 @ 1:24PM
Actually, that was the first time I have seen him state his opinion clearly and without equivocation. I think he needs to double down on it and confront the liberal BS that corporations are inherently evil. Corporations ARE people...from their workers to their investors...to retirees drawing from 401ks. He needs to speak clearly and help folks understand economics.
Regards,
Mike
Bill Hussein O'Stalin| 8.12.11 @ 3:26PM
It's surprising that we are short of cash and a left wing organization is still receiving taxpayer subsidies. If Romney makes it I hope he learns his lesson and shuts it right down.
c. j. acworth| 8.12.11 @ 6:23PM
I was wondering who would be the first to say this.
Occam's Tool| 8.12.11 @ 3:59PM
Well, Ron Paul and NPR agree on Foreign Policy---both think that nuking Israel would be a great idea.
WJ| 8.12.11 @ 4:48PM
I don't recall hearing either Ron Paul or NPR advocate nuking Israel.
You are embarrass yourself.
David W| 8.12.11 @ 6:26PM
Are you surprised? The liberal pot calling the conservative kettle "black" (and this is not racist, just a saying, for you libtards).
Shakaama Live | 9.5.11 @ 9:22AM
As an outsider looking in, on the duopoly that is the democrat / republican trick, I have clarity that most do not have, i.e. the ability to see the plans within plans and the motives of the lesser men that make them. Not to call the author out or anything, but apparently he is trying to bring Mitt Romney back into the spotlight, given Gov. Perry's usurping of the supposed republican lead, contrary to what the Ron Paul campaign would suggest.
I think everyone is in agreement that a Ron Paul administration would be a bad thing, FOR BOTH DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS. And, it would definitely spell the end of federal funding of NPR to begin with.
However, given that the media and the duopoly butter each others' bread, it is no wonder they ignore the people, i.e. tea party, Ron Paul supporters, libertarian supporters. This "minority" is now a majority of the actual voters.
Mitt Romney of course would be a 3rd generation GW Bush administration, right behind GW and Obama himself. I know the duopoly tries to make GW and Obama look like different people, what with him being half black and all, but all 3 are corporatist and not card carrying members of neither the democrat nor republican party.