Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey will be the keynote speaker at
the 2012 Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida, not the
nominee, a political science professor at Rider University in
Lawrenceville, N.J. has concluded.
Christie has been the subject of intense speculation on the part
of high profile political commentators that he may yet enter the
race before the end of the year. Tucker Carlson, co-founder and
editor-in-chief of the Daily Caller, for instance, said during an
address in New Orleans last week that he expected Christie to
declare his candidacy by October and that the N.J. governor would
most likely win the Republican nomination.
Carlson was one of the main speakers featured as part of the
American Legislative Exchange Council’s (ALECs)
annual meeting. Although Christie has repeatedly denied any
presidential intentions, he will find it difficult to resist “the
pull of history,” Carlson said.
But Ben Dworkin, who serves as the director for the Rebovich
Institute for New Jersey Politics, said in an interview that he
does not expect Christie to be a presidential candidate in 2012.
Instead, Christie will remain a visible and forceful figure
within the Republican Party and keep his options open for 2016.
“Every decision he makes has the added element of
signaling to a national audience,” Dwokin observed. Christie is a
very smart politician and he is trying to burnish his credentials.
But I don’t think his ambitions are for 2012. I see him as the
keynote speaker at the [Republican] convention, and this is
something he will be good at.”
Dworkin outlined three main scenarios for Gov. Christie.
- Christie does run in 2012 as Carlson and others have
suggested.
- Christie looks ahead to 2016 and runs for re-election as
governor of N.J.
- Christie does not run for re-election as governor and instead
tours the country with a record of accomplishment giving
speeches and raising his profile.
“Christie is not a slam dunk for re-election as governor,”
Dworkin observed. “There is a key group of swing voters that decide
late and Christie could have trouble with this group, they are
suburban women.”
Moreover, Democrats continue to enjoy a substantial registration
advantage, Dworkin noted. The latest figures show there are about
800,000 more N.J. residents registered as Democrats than as
Republicans. While Christie has received Democratic support for
some his most important initiatives, such as reforming the pension
system, he does have make very careful political calculations on
certain issues, Dworkin said.
This is most certainly the case on environmental policy.
In May,
Christie announced that he was withdrawing his state from the
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), which included cap and
trade provisions. But, at the same time, the governor also embraced
several green initiatives and said that “no new coal would be
permitted in New Jersey.” Christie also said he was willing to
“defer to experts” who believe human activity is responsible for
global warming. But just a few months earlier during a town hall
meeting in Toms River, Christie had expressed skepticism toward the
idea of man-made global warming.
“Gov. Christie’s views on the environment must be viewed within
a broad context,” Dworkin said. “He must navigate his way between
the strong, pro-environmental views of his state and with a
national Republican Party that is much more conservative than the
average New Jersey voter is on the environment.”
N.J. environmental groups are very well-funded and wield
significant influence on both parties. Three of the state’s
Republican congressman voted in favor of the “Waxman-Markey” cap
and trade bill that passed the House in 2009 and Christie himself
was endorsed by the NJ Environmental Federation.
But Dworkin is not convinced that Christie has suddenly gone
green.
“Just because he has been all over the map [on environmental
issues], doesn’t mean he is actually looking for a place in the
middle,” he said. “Christie came in for severe criticism after the
talk in Toms River and realized he needed to pull back a bit.”
Christie is an ideal pick for the keynote and will deliver a
strong address that appeals to the Republican base and helps to
position the NJ governor for a future run, Dworkin said.
Up until now, I’ve held that view that Christie needs to
finish what he started in my home state as a lot of heavy lifting
still needs to be done. But after listening to T. Carlson in New
Orleans I’m beginning to warm to the idea that the country can’t
wait until 2016 to get started on restoring its financial standing.
It’s also worth noting that there could be more openings on the
U.S. Supreme Court. I don’t know too much about Gov. Rick Perry of
Texas who sounds like he’s running. I do know that if he doesn’t
catch on there is an opening for someone else.
Amjean| 8.10.11 @ 9:36AM
Bless your heart, you silly fool - it will be Palin.
A. Doer| 8.10.11 @ 12:05PM
Palin for keynote speaker? It depends on who the nominee is. If the nominee is Bachmann then Christie would be a good choice for the keynote speaker. The tea party would be thrilled with the choice of Bachmann but she turns off a lot of independents, so Christie would bring a balancing note of sanity. On the other hand if the nominee is someone like Romney then having Palin as the keynote speaker would be an attempt to get the tea partiers to rally behind a candidate they don't like.
NJConservative| 8.10.11 @ 9:39AM
How can you be from NJ and think that Christie is actually fixing our state? Taxes are still going up. Unemployment is up. there have been no cuts to state government or the state workforce. the entire bureaucracy is in tact. He's done nothing to address property taxes while increasing the redistribution of wealth from suburban and rural districts to places like Camden and Newark. Chrsite has done some decent things but on balance little is changing here. Stop believing the hype. There's no meat on the bone. And should we even begin to discuss how his administration is infested with liberals starting with his AG?
Kevin Mooney| 8.10.11 @ 9:49AM
I do give Christie points in some areas like reforming the NJ Sup Court. But he concerns me with the green talk.
martin j smith| 8.10.11 @ 10:12AM
I suspect Christie would be a very frustrating candidate for die hard conservatives because there is a very strong RINO streak even with some of his achievements in economic matters. Very highly imperfect but for a momentary lull I would take him over Obama he if were my only option.
Bill Hussein O'Stalin| 8.10.11 @ 10:46AM
Anyone who believes in man made climate change is a few light bulbs short of a load.
RWinks| 8.10.11 @ 12:06PM
Christie was the last choice of conservatives in the NJ primary because he is a liberal Republican. His willingness to call idiots and criminals, idiots and criminals is admirable but hardly compensates for big government policies and pandering to Muslim Jihadis.
The Underground Conservative | 8.10.11 @ 12:23PM
"Instead, Christie will remain a visible and forceful figure within the Republican Party and keep his options open for 2016. "
GOP Establishment RINOs think Christie wants to challenge a sitting conservative incumbent? Or are they really willing to throw the 2012 election and have President Downgrade re-elected?
A. Doer| 8.10.11 @ 12:39PM
Christie would hold onto a lot of the tea party vote just by being not-Obama. He'd get a lot of the moderate and independent vote because his style of speaking bluntly is refreshing, and he's not scary like Bachmann is to voters who don't share Bachmann's social agenda.
Bachmann on the other hand would have the tea partiers enthralled but would alienate a lot of the independents in the middle. Tea partiers care more about ideological purity than they do about winning. They did it with Angle and O'Donnell and they'd do it again with Bachmann if they get the chance.
In other words, Christie is guessing that the GOP will end up running someone like Bachmann or Palin who is ideal to tea partiers and not to anyone else. Then in 2016 Obama's second term will be ending, the economy will be in bad shape, and the tea party will be weakened.
Occam's Tool| 8.10.11 @ 1:09PM
Christie is VERY weak on Sharia. Not as weak as Paul, but weak.
A. Doer| 8.10.11 @ 1:41PM
Yeah, he thinks all the tea party frothing about encroachment of sharia is just crazy, and he's tired of dealing with crazies. Good for him.