The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Politico leads this morning with a story about liberal dissatisfaction with the debt deal. They quote Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, the chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus, as saying, "If I was a Republican, this is a night to party." Rep. Raul Grijalva, the Arizona Democrat who co-chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus, went even further.

"This deal trades people's livelihoods for the votes of a few unappeasable right-wing radicals, and I will not support it," he said, criticizing Obama's leadership. "The Democratic Party, no less than the Republican Party, is at a very serious crossroads at this moment. This deal weakens the Democratic Party as badly as it weakens the country," Grijalva continued. "We have given much and received nothing in return. The lesson today is that Republicans can hold their breath long enough to get what they want."

Despite this tough talk, it is worth asking whether liberal opposition to the debt deal will mean anything. Liberals grumbled when the Bush tax cuts were continued, but ultimately didn't vote against the extension in large enough numbers to accomplish anything. The Congressional Progressive Caucus threatened to withhold support from a health care bill that didn't have the public option, only to fall in line when their votes were needed. In fact, they only narrowly averted a health care bill with no public option and no funding of abortion. Crickets chirped as Obama continued the Bush national security policies, going beyond Bush on targeted assasinations.

The only liberal revolt of any consequence during the Obama presidency was over the AIG bonuses. And even that was something of a left-right populist protest that failed to bring down Treasuy Secretary Tim Geithner. Maybe a combination of liberal and conservative opponents will be able to sink this debt deal. But it is looking more like the deals to avoid tax increases and government shutdown -- one that could pass with the support of both parties' leaders despite opposition from the left and the right.

View all comments (5) | Leave a comment

simon templar| 8.1.11 @ 12:13PM

You are absolutely correct. This is all about creating a narrative. They know damn well, they got what they wanted...another big blank check..no real cuts.

R E Malitz| 8.1.11 @ 11:08AM

Sir,

The only things socialists do are, lie, steal, enslave, and kill. "liberal Opposition"? In truth, merely another lie. On health-care, how did the "Blue-dog" dems vote? Was it a surprise? The one thing the Party demands is loyally to the Party Line. As Trotsky said, "one can not be right against the Party".

Reagan Akbar!

Out. REM

Clint| 8.1.11 @ 12:40PM

Let's Fool The Voters Again.

The Libs Will Pretend To Revolt & The Mainstream Media Will "Define" This As A Tea Party Win.

We Tea Party Patriots Don't Allow The Mainstream Media To "Define" Us & We Ain't Buyin' The Lyin' From The Libs.

The Tea Party Rebellion Is here & Now.

Stand & Fight.

Oldefarte| 8.1.11 @ 4:55PM

Everybody lies unfortionately, but Democrats make a living from it. Hope & Change, the disguise of Obama as a moderate/average/typical American [as opposed to the ultimate liberal candidate that the Democrats could offer], got us to the present point. The defecit/debt was bad before 11/4/08, but he/Democrats exploded it thereafter with WELFARECARE and STIMULUS TO LABOR UNIONS. Completely eliminate those two and the defecit/debt is managable. The independent, floting swing voters bought the Democrats' Bs hook, line and sinker in 2008 and we're paying big time now. Teddy Kennedy pulled the largest trojun-horsed conquering of a nation in all of history and STUPIDS bought it!!!!!!!

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2011/08/01/will-liberal-opposition-mean-a

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT