So far Jon Huntsman is the only Republican presidential
candidate to say unambiguously nice things about the pending
bipartisan agreement on the debt ceiling. Newt Gingrich stopped
short of opposing it outright, but said only negative things and
argued it would not lift the country out of the "Obama depression."
Mitt Romney and Tim Pawlenty joined Ron Paul and Michele Bachmann
in opposing it. Conservative dream non-candidates Paul Ryan and
Marco Rubio split, with Ryan fer it and Rubi again' it.
All the "agreement" potentially does is put Congress on the
record supporting spending cuts. The proposed cuts are too far in
the future to ever be realized. What the proposal may do is buy
enough time that the next Congress and administration can enact
actual, immediate, and DEEP cuts in the federal budget. A trillion
over ten years is as nothing. A trillion per year is not enough to
bring this monster into balance.
To quote Oliver Cromwell, Mr. President and Congress, "you have
sat too long for any good you have been doing. In the name of God,
go."
Which candidate will commit to actual, signifcantand itemized
cuts in federal spending? That is who we should support.
Oldefarte| 8.1.11 @ 4:09PM
Amen, and furthermore, which POLITICAL PARTY has shown
commitment to the conservative wishes of most of us here. The tea
party deserves a tremendous amount of thanks and respect for the
valiant efforts of their patriotic membership. They are simply
GREAT FOLKS and deserve a big pat of the back; and we must all
continue to become individually informed from conservative news
sites such as this etc, to participate as much as possible and to
VOTE FOR CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS [there hasn't been any comparable
conservatives with the Democratic Party for maybe a decade, so
supporting them is pure fools gold, ie Hole &
Change]!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Margie| 8.1.11 @ 4:17PM
Amen, you 2.!
Clint| 8.1.11 @ 5:28PM
Bluto:
What? Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it
is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!
Al Adab| 8.1.11 @ 3:28PM
All the "agreement" potentially does is put Congress on the record supporting spending cuts. The proposed cuts are too far in the future to ever be realized. What the proposal may do is buy enough time that the next Congress and administration can enact actual, immediate, and DEEP cuts in the federal budget. A trillion over ten years is as nothing. A trillion per year is not enough to bring this monster into balance.
To quote Oliver Cromwell, Mr. President and Congress, "you have sat too long for any good you have been doing. In the name of God, go."
Which candidate will commit to actual, signifcantand itemized cuts in federal spending? That is who we should support.
Oldefarte| 8.1.11 @ 4:09PM
Amen, and furthermore, which POLITICAL PARTY has shown commitment to the conservative wishes of most of us here. The tea party deserves a tremendous amount of thanks and respect for the valiant efforts of their patriotic membership. They are simply GREAT FOLKS and deserve a big pat of the back; and we must all continue to become individually informed from conservative news sites such as this etc, to participate as much as possible and to VOTE FOR CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS [there hasn't been any comparable conservatives with the Democratic Party for maybe a decade, so supporting them is pure fools gold, ie Hole & Change]!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Margie| 8.1.11 @ 4:17PM
Amen, you 2.!
Clint| 8.1.11 @ 5:28PM
Bluto:
What? Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!
The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here & Now.
Stand & Fight.