The New York Times printed
an editorial on Sunday absolving President Obama of blame for
the massive ongoing budget deficits. Instead, the Times
argued that the cause of the deficits is "largely the Bush-era tax
cuts" (which apparently somehow include tax cuts signed into law by
Obama) as well as wars and the recession. The Times
analysis was picked up and trumpeted by a
number of
liberal
pundits, many of whom passed along this graph:
They are all wrong. Bush is not responsible for the deficits.
John F. Kennedy is. He started with the tax cuts, reducing the top
rate from 91 percent and signing an overall package about the
same
size as the Bush tax cuts.
The Kennedy-era tax cuts are largely responsible for today's
deficits*. If they had never been enacted, we would be sitting on
trillion-dollar surpluses as far as the eye can see.
* Successive presidents, including Obama, didn't undo them.
Doesn't matter.
I would rather not operate under the assumption that tax cuts
"cost" the government anything. Suggesting that the government has
first right to the property of its citizens is not a winning
position.
I think it would be easier to suggest that raising taxes, or
even not cutting taxes further costs the private, productive
economy.
If this Administration can make up economic statistics why can't
anyone else. We should keep track of "jobs destroyed" by the
policies of this Administration.
Some how I don't think it would be mindlessly repeated as "jobs
saved" has been by the lap dogs reporting on this
Administration.
RJ| 7.26.11 @ 2:38PM
Why stop with Kennedy? What about the colonists who protested
the Stamp Tax in the 1760s? Shouldn't they be held accountable for
our current debt problem? If they had just stopped whining and paid
the moderate tax, there would be no problems in government finance.
Whatever the case, President Chauncy Gardner is not
responsible.
Clint| 7.26.11 @ 3:06PM
"When President George W. Bush took office, our national debt
was $5.768 trillion. By the time Bush left office, it had nearly
doubled, to $10.626 trillion. So Bush's record on deficit spending
was not good at all: During his presidency, the national debt rose
by an average of $607 billion a year. How does that compare to
Obama? During Obama's presidency to date, the national debt has
risen by an average of $1.723 trillion a year — or by a
jaw-dropping $1.116 trillion more, per year, than it rose even
under Bush."
Wayne | 7.26.11 @ 7:46PM
Again challenge the semantics. A tax cut is not an expense. It
also helped bring in revenue, because it grew the economy. The GOP
really needs to do a better job of messaging.
axbucxdu| 7.26.11 @ 11:24PM
So the progs on the left are getting so desperate that they're
now publicly confabulating among themselves? They sound like their
brethren nazis before the end of the war that put all their
deranged hope in those rumored wonder weapons...this is their
end...my only friend, their end...
EJK| 7.28.11 @ 5:03PM
Jesus Christ. Right-wing droolers truly are as dumb as people
say.
Indiana Alex| 7.26.11 @ 2:18PM
I would rather not operate under the assumption that tax cuts "cost" the government anything. Suggesting that the government has first right to the property of its citizens is not a winning position.
I think it would be easier to suggest that raising taxes, or even not cutting taxes further costs the private, productive economy.
If this Administration can make up economic statistics why can't anyone else. We should keep track of "jobs destroyed" by the policies of this Administration.
Some how I don't think it would be mindlessly repeated as "jobs saved" has been by the lap dogs reporting on this Administration.
RJ| 7.26.11 @ 2:38PM
Why stop with Kennedy? What about the colonists who protested the Stamp Tax in the 1760s? Shouldn't they be held accountable for our current debt problem? If they had just stopped whining and paid the moderate tax, there would be no problems in government finance. Whatever the case, President Chauncy Gardner is not responsible.
Clint| 7.26.11 @ 3:06PM
"When President George W. Bush took office, our national debt was $5.768 trillion. By the time Bush left office, it had nearly doubled, to $10.626 trillion. So Bush's record on deficit spending was not good at all: During his presidency, the national debt rose by an average of $607 billion a year. How does that compare to Obama? During Obama's presidency to date, the national debt has risen by an average of $1.723 trillion a year — or by a jaw-dropping $1.116 trillion more, per year, than it rose even under Bush."
Wayne | 7.26.11 @ 7:46PM
Again challenge the semantics. A tax cut is not an expense. It also helped bring in revenue, because it grew the economy. The GOP really needs to do a better job of messaging.
axbucxdu| 7.26.11 @ 11:24PM
So the progs on the left are getting so desperate that they're now publicly confabulating among themselves? They sound like their brethren nazis before the end of the war that put all their deranged hope in those rumored wonder weapons...this is their end...my only friend, their end...
EJK| 7.28.11 @ 5:03PM
Jesus Christ. Right-wing droolers truly are as dumb as people say.
Thanks! I needed a good laugh today.