There are plenty of things to love about Washington, D.C.’s
“transitioning” H Street neighborhood, like Granville Moore’s, a
Belgian mussel joint with a spectacular beer selection. But H
Street wasn’t always this way.
In fact, it was a pretty murky place 30 years ago:
The city had a long way to go when the redevelopment process
began. Like a number of D.C. neighborhoods, the corridor was
devastated by riots that erupted after the assassination of
the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968.
For years afterward, 30 percent of the buildings on H Street
were boarded up or left vacant, according to the nonprofit H Street Community
Development Corp.
Eugenia Kim, 59, a novelist, remembers her first week on 12th
and G streets Northeast in 1984. She was greeted with the news that
a middle-aged woman named
Catherine Fuller had been robbed, sodomized and killed in the
neighborhood.
Thankfully, things have gotten better, albeit slowly. Mayor
Anthony Williams announced a plan to “revitalize” H Street,
providing it with office buildings, residential units, retail, and
even a streetcar line. As the Post writes: “The opening of the $13
million streetcar line between Union Station and Benning Road has
been pushed back, but if all goes according to the current plan,
trolleys will start rolling in 2013.” Mussels for everybody,
right?
Well, here’s a textbook example of how government spending can
displace the market. The same article notes that Salim Newman, born
and raised on H Street, has been the owner of a shop on the
corridor since 2006:
When construction began on the streetcar line, Newman, 40, said
he watched many of his friends’ businesses close their doors
because of the construction and lack of parking: a beauty shop, a
perfume store and a carryout place.
…
Nat Carter, 63, manager of Smokey’s Barbershop and Oldies, isn’t
leaving, despite the fact that construction of the streetcar line
pushed profits so low that “now we are just getting
by.”
Kim, the novelist, has taken her son for haircuts at Smokey’s,
which has been around since 1961. She says if people such as Carter
stick around, H Street will retain its “real rootedness.”
That’s a pretty strong “if.” Development in any area should be
welcomed, but these were small businesses that had to stand on
their own two legs without the lobbying efforts of larger
developers. I might sound like I’m saying it’s bad that this area
is developing — I don’t know, it could be good, it could be bad —
but Salim Newman tells us that the businesses that had finally
started to develop in the area have already been displaced by
bigger players who got in when the political atmosphere was just
right to give them the incentives to do so. In many ways, this is a
more subtle version of eminent domain.
The planners hope that the consequences will be outweighed by
the opportunity provided by the new jobs that sweep in. Maybe it’s
worth it — in the end.
Derek Leaberry| 7.26.11 @ 9:12AM
At 51 and a life-long suburban and exurban Maryland resident, I can vouch how brutal, mean and coarse the H Street corridor(gateway to Eastern Maryland for DC long-time commuters) was for many years. To be blunt, it has been in the process of being whiteified for the last few years by liberal whites unafraid of being mugged or worse. And I know of one young liberal woman who did get worse. Nonetheless, because the Federal leviathan grows virtually unabated no matter which party governs, the Capitol Hill neighborhood has grown like kudzu to H Street on the north and is on the way to reaching the mighty Anacostia River on the east. H Street is a sign of economic progress albeit caused by the rise of the two-party monster state.
Bill Hussein O'Stalin| 7.26.11 @ 10:21AM
Washington and Baltimore are murder and thug central. Although prohibition (central planning from Washington) spawned many thugs, big government has spawned many more.
The lesson has yet to be learned.
Mo| 7.26.11 @ 1:39PM
The H Street area, and potentially further neighborhoods all the way to Anacostia, are being gentrified by means of an alliance between property developers, city and federal upper-level leaders (including elected ones) who make policy for D.C. development, and the beneficiaries of this development, namely federal employees or people deriving their income from federal contracts. This is done at the expense of black people, mainly, some others, who are still trying to preserve some space for free enterprise in D.C. The H Street rehabilitation can not unfairly be described as a class war against these people by taxpayer-supported commissars by any other name. In the short term, this may be good -- there's nothing desirable about run-down boweries. But in the longer term, the destruction of a small-business black entrepreneurial class in this area, to make way for upper-middle class federal workers of both colors presumes the relentless march of the ruling class that depends on taxes for its wealth. But in the longer run, where is the tax revenue going to come from, if they destroy the business class?
conservative academic| 7.26.11 @ 2:34PM
Didn't the DC government compensate small businesses on U Street when it was disrupted for years by the constuction of the Metro? I think that was a very similar situation (gentrification, etc.).