The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Second Time as Farce

The Washington Post reports that Senate leaders from both parties are working on a debt limit measure that would be grossly complex. In short, the idea is to add $1.5 in discretionary budget cuts (but not the ones Republicans wanted) to the already-convoluted McConnell plan for raising the ceiling, and then provide for a "new committee of 12 lawmakers, which would issue a report to Congress by the end of the year on how to cut trillions more from federal deficits over the next 10 years."

Each feature of this complicated plan is designed so that one or more party can avoid accountability or place blame on another group. The idea that a new report-issuing committee would be helpful is especially laughable -- as if the Bowles-Simpson committee had never happened. 

Of course, Bowles-Simpson was a way for President Obama to avoid any responsibility. It was successful in that respect, and another incarnation would also probably be just as good for that purpose. 

View all comments (9) | Leave a comment

Handy| 7.18.11 @ 11:48AM

Obama has no principles, hence no morals. He would applaud any pragmatic(non-value based) approach to any problem so long as it furthered his goal to establish tyrannical Solcialism(an unprincipled, amoral system).

Handy| 7.18.11 @ 12:04PM

Sorry about my first post. It was meant for another thread, but applies nonetheless.

Isn't it amazing that none of the main players in this debt drama are anxious to take the lead, and accolades, of their solutions? They all want the wiggle room to point fingers in case things blow up.

I mean, McConnell's ploy is not to solve the underlying problem. It's goal is to stick it to Obama while remaining blameless himself. If adopted, it will backfire, of course.

There should be no compromise on the debt ceiling, period. That's why Krauthammer's plan is ridiculous, too. If there are $500B available to be cut, then why does the debt have to be raised by an exact amount? Hell, why not just lower the ceiling instead?

It's as simple as this. If spending cuts are available, they should be made. If they are made, we don't need no more stinking debt!!!

Handy| 7.18.11 @ 12:04PM

Sorry about my first post. It was meant for another thread, but applies nonetheless.

Isn't it amazing that none of the main players in this debt drama are anxious to take the lead, and accolades, of their solutions? They all want the wiggle room to point fingers in case things blow up.

I mean, McConnell's ploy is not to solve the underlying problem. It's goal is to stick it to Obama while remaining blameless himself. If adopted, it will backfire, of course.

There should be no compromise on the debt ceiling, period. That's why Krauthammer's plan is ridiculous, too. If there are $500B available to be cut, then why does the debt have to be raised by an exact amount? Hell, why not just lower the ceiling instead?

It's as simple as this. If spending cuts are available, they should be made. If they are made, we don't need no more stinking debt!!!

Occam's Tool| 7.18.11 @ 12:04PM

Lower taxes to increase revenues (X=2Y. Therefore, .23 X> .39Y)

Get rid of all Cabinet Level Departments except, State, Defense, State, Interior. Subsume other Cabinet level Department's functions under those four. (Look at how the CVabinet posts grew sometime---fascinating).

Repeal ObamaCare, institute Tort Reform with Safe harbors that allow for cost effective medicine.

Don't fight our enemies, annihilate them. No Nation Building.

Steve A| 7.18.11 @ 12:22PM

Occam, Where do I sign up?

Clint| 7.18.11 @ 12:19PM

Dr. Ron Paul
November 28, 2010:
"I have two simple proposals when the new Congress convenes in January. First, refuse to raise the debt ceiling. Find a way, month by month, for Congress to spend only what the Treasury raises in revenue. Second, start over from scratch with the 13 appropriations bills that fund the federal government. Reject any talk of baseline budgets or discretionary spending. It is all discretionary, and members of both parties should vote against any 2012 appropriation bill that is not at least 10% smaller – in nominal dollars – than its 2011 counterpart."

The Tea Party Rebellion Escalates.

Carpe Diem.

R E Malitz| 7.18.11 @ 12:26PM

Sir.

These "Senate Leaders" simple do not understand reality. They have sat too long and need to go.

Reagan Akbar!

OUT. REM

David W| 7.18.11 @ 2:21PM

Damn all of them (democrats and republicans). they do not care about the people or the country. Only about their own rearends and that of their respective party.

Frederick| 7.18.11 @ 3:04PM

We the people want the existing structures of government (the way it is set up under the US Constitution) to do the governing. This entire concept of the elected reps then getting together and setting up subcommisions, commtittees, task forces, and panels to do the governing, in some cases being set up to have power over congress itself, is illegal.

Congress People: have some guts and do the governing yourselves or you will be replaced by someone who will.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Joseph Lawler

http://spectator.org/blog/2011/07/18/second-time-as-farce

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT