RedState did its homework on this lefty law prof so you don't have to. What did they find? An appearance with Howard Zinn in support of Cambridge, Mass., passing a nuclear-free resolution and defense of a domestic terrorist group. The American Bar Association has already dismissed (pdf) Flym's Vanguard claims against Sam Alito, so this raving is just gravy after a week of Democrat rambling.
The Spectacle Blog
A LexisNexis search quickly debunks Bill Clinton's explanation of the failure of his health care proposal.
The first item comes from the Nov. 20, 1994 Washington Times:
But the DLC's growing hostility over the Clinton White House's move from New Democrat ideas really began last fall, when the president unveiled his health care reform plan.
DLC leaders flatly rejected the government-run plan crafted by first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, saying it was an old liberal proposal that could not pass.
At the time, Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, a DLC vice chairman, said the plan was "too big, too costly, too bureaucratic."
Publicly, DLC leaders who wanted a cheaper, more market-oriented plan kept their criticism focused on the policy implications of the health care issue. Privately, some of them criticized Mrs. Clinton for pushing the plan on the party and giving Republicans a chance to use it to define her husband as "another big-government liberal."
On this morning's "Morning Edition" on NPR, Steve Inskeep interviewed Bill Clinton about worldwide health issues. In the course of discussing his efforts arould the world, Inskeep raised the 1993-94 HillaryCare fight:
Clinton: Well, I don't know if I have any advice for him, but I think that what we tried to do back in '93 and '94, still has some relevance. The real problem was that we didn't have any money 'cause we had a big deficit so we couldn't provide universal coverage without some sort of employer mandate.
Inskeep: Also couldn't build enough political support for a specific solution in '93 and '94.
There was a bit of consternation among Pentagon leaders when L. Paul Bremer's book about his
I just heard Bill Clinton on NPR's Morning Edition, waxing reminiscent about his administration's spectacularly failed health care plan. When he claimed that it bombed because of high deficits, the commentator (a quick one) quickly countered by referencing the political opposition. Roughly quoting: "Oh, well that was just because the health insurance companies didn't want it. But there's enough support today for it." Perhaps they didn't want socialist health care.
I'll check back later this morning with a more accurate transcript.
The Maryland General Assembly extended open arms to business growth yesterday, overriding Gov. Ehrlich's veto of their anti-Wal-Mart health care bill:
"We don't want to kill this giant. We want this giant to behave itself," said Del. Anne Healey (D-Prince George's County), the lead sponsor in the House. "We want this giant not to be a bully."
That bully employs 17,000 citizens in your state. Maryland makes me proud to be a citizen of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Look for some clarity on the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito by mid-afternoon. By then, the Senate Republican leadership will have completed a strategy conference call, Sen. Bill Frist will have taken the lay of the land on the Judiciary Committee, and Sen. Harry Reid will have decided just how badly he wants to destroy the United States Senate.
Sources tell us that Sen. Harry Reid is being heavily pressured by Sens. Ted Kennedy and Patrick Leahy to do everything in his power to help them delay the final vote on Judge Alito to the Supreme Court into early February. Reid and Frist discussed such an option yesterday, or should we say that Reid mentioned the idea and Frist told him to go pound sand.
If this is the way Rep. John Shadegg makes a decision, perhaps he isn't the right man for the House GOP leadership slot.
Mid-afternoon yesterday, Shadegg supporters were emailing associates around town that their man had decided not to seek the Republican leader position. A few hours later, upon further consultation with advisers and members of the Republican caucus, he indicated that should Reps. Roy Blunt or John Boehner not move closer to wrapping up a win, he will enter the race.
At this point, his "I'm out, but I'm in" approach to political gamesmanship is making him look indecisive and rather small.
Jed, last night John Batchelor pressed an analyst from Stratfor.com on Iran's actual intentions. The analyst said that as long as Iran "didn't cross the line," there would be something Iran could settle for as a nuclear power in the Middle East, something, he implied, that could be acceptable to the United States, too.
How can this be? President Bush memorably said, at West Point, that you can't wait for Chicago to be in smoke before reacting to a threat, and surely that's right -- especially in the case of a mad theocracy with nuclear weapons.
I don't see Iran being happy to "settle" for anything. And I don't see any way out than some kind of military action, probably within the year.
How do you see it? Generals always consider logistics first, and the logistics are awful.