-
Even the Europeans Rethink the Welfare State
April 21, 2013 | 4 comments
-
ObamaCare for Everyone Except Obama’s Appointees
March 8, 2013 | 3 comments
-
The Sensitive Saudis: They Want Democracy for Everyone Else
March 5, 2013 | 3 comments
-
Remember, There Is No Spending Problem!
February 26, 2013 | 1 comment
-
Another Useful Reminder that Communism was Loathsome
February 24, 2013 | 16 comments
The Spectacle Blog
So much for legislative “clout” on Capitol Hill, which usually means the ability to mulct the public for the benefit of special interest groups which then will contribute towards one’s reelection. Because voters took the power of redistricting away from the state legislature, California’s incumbent congressmen may no longer look forward to easy and perpetual reelection.
In 2010, voters got fed up and passed a ballot initiative - Proposition 20 - to take control of congressional redistricting away from the state legislature and hand it to an unelected commission. That body has now presented its first draft of a congressional map that sent shock waves through the state, drawing several members out of their current districts and into potential fights with other lawmakers.
“That’s what the people wanted,” said Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.). “They wanted a redistricting that ignored the protection of incumbents.”
Will any of the state’s most senior members fall victim to the new map? The jury is still out - and the map faces more revisions before the lines are set - but there’s no question that some long-protected incumbents will have a hotter summer than usual.
America likes to call itself a republic, but what kind of democratic system creates an unlevel political playing field in which legislators have higher reelection rates than members of the old Soviet Communist Central Committee had retention rates? Now if only we could apply term limits to Congress.
View all comments (7) | Leave a comment
More Blog Posts by Doug Bandow
http://spectator.org/blog/2011/06/21/california-gerrymandering-rip
Follow us:
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
FLASHBACK TO: 1995
-
Pope Culture
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
-
Why the GOP Does Not, Like, Totally Suck
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
-
Dames at Sea
-
In the Absence of Guns
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
-
The Metaphysical Martini
-
Counting the Costs of Clintonism
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
-
Chuck McHagel
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
-
The Legacy of Old John and Mother Fresh-Roasted
-
It’s the Best Time of the Year
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
-
The Bush Crack-Up
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Clip of the Day
ADVERTISEMENT
Scott| 6.21.11 @ 10:07AM
We have term limits. They're called elections.
For all the talk of gerrymandering and whatnot, at the end of the day, elected officials are in office because they are ELECTED. If the voters didn't want them, or at least prefer them to any of the other choices, they'd get rid of them.
Warrior | 6.21.11 @ 3:42PM
How about making potential voters take a small ten question test prior to being allowed to register. Simple questions like name the VP, spell your name correctly, what are the first ten amendments to the Constitution named...
Scott| 6.21.11 @ 10:25PM
I could go for "spell your name correctly." As for the rest, I think it's unfair to hold voters to a higher standard than elected officials.
Come to think of it, maybe we shouldn't have that "spell your name correctly" thing...
Paul Windels| 6.21.11 @ 10:42AM
The issue of redistricting commissions is always who is on the commission. Finding truly impartial and nonpartisan players is tricky, as it is very easy to dress up a partisan in nonpartisan garb. Perhaps the work of any commission should have to be ratified by the voters at a general election.
carol| 6.21.11 @ 12:08PM
what map are you looking at
the redistricting group are pawns and have not made any real changes and probably won't it's a fraud and a con we have a real non- gerrymandered map if you need it
Humphrey Dumfries| 6.21.11 @ 3:39PM
AmSpec Word of the Day: mulct: 1.Extract money from (someone) by fine or taxation
http://www.google.com/search?q=mulct
MarkJ| 6.25.11 @ 2:25PM
How was the Soviet Central Committee different from the current California Democrat delegation to Congress?
The Central Committee was younger, more open to new ideas, and had a faster turnover rate.