Bill Clinton has proposed a blueprint for creating jobs and
ending the unemployment crisis. Altogether, he has 14
ideas, which
he shares in Newsweek.
Not all of his suggestions are terrible. But the most
thought-out and specific ones seem like they were taken out of
Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign, especially the five that are “green”
iniatives. The idea that the government could put unemployed people
to work on green jobs to the benefit of the economy was
fatuous in 2008. That Clinton doesn’t have any better ideas
now, three years later, is frightening, if it’s any indication of
what the Democrats and Obama are thinking.
For example, Clinton suggests that “We could put a million
people to work retrofitting buildings all over America.” Has he not
heard Obama
acknowledge that “there’s no such thing as
shovel-ready projects”? Retrofitting buildings to lower energy
consumption is not a low-skill job. The government cannot will into
existence thousands of companies with all of the diverse
capabilities needed to retrofit builldings, much less guarantee
that those companies would draw their new hires from the ranks of
the currently unemployed.
Or how about this idea, filed under “state-by-state
solutions”:
There may be some things that the states can do to loosen
this up. One of the reasons Harry Reid won in Nevada is that, right
before the election, two big Chinese companies announced they were
moving factories there to make LED lightbulbs and turbines for the
big wind farms down in Texas. Nevada is a little state, and it
gained more than 4,000 jobs.
Or this one:
The U.S. didn’t ratify the Kyoto accords, of course, because Al
Gore and I left office, and the next government wasn’t for it. They
were all wrong. Before the financial meltdown, the four countries
that will meet their Kyoto greenhouse-gas emission targets were
outperforming America with lower unemployment, more new business
formation, and less income inequality.
So we ratify Kyoto, and then add millions of jobs?
How?
And this idea isn’t an idea at all:
11. TEACH SKILLS WE
NEED
I’m trying to figure out why job seekers don’t have the skills
companies need; why the community colleges and vocational programs,
which have done such a great job for America, are not providing
more people with the skills to fill these vacancies. Do people just
not enroll in the right programs or do they drop out because of the
economy? I hope we can find out.
This is kind of the whole show. The economy needs to match
workers’ skills to jobs; there’s not much the government can do to
help that process.
On the other hand, Clinton’s best ideas are the ones that sound
the most Republican. Clinton suggests cutting corporate tax rates
and suspending state environmental regulations. Too bad those
weren’t on the table in 2008.
Occam's Tool| 6.20.11 @ 12:28PM
Why we don't have kids with the skills we need? Because you LIberal swine have turned schools into a dangerous environment for teachers in which ridiculous rule following is more important than education, and indoctrination is more important than teaching kids to read.
One of my nurses told me that working on a state inpatient psychiatric unit, with all of the patients there for danger to self or others behavior was much safer than his previous job---as a Seventh Grade teacher.
ncatty| 6.20.11 @ 4:08PM
It is laughable that Bill Clinton claims to know anything about economics. Has he ever met a payroll? For that matter, has he ever earned a paycheck in the private sector? He is a clown.
shipley130| 6.20.11 @ 8:45PM
Income inequality coming from Bill Clinton is a real gut buster.
Cheap golf clubs | 6.21.11 @ 8:33AM
so nice post