Luigi Zingales, the respected economics professor at the
University of Chicago who has argued so persuasively that
government should be pro-market,
not pro-business, now weighs in on the
Republican presidential race. It comes as no surprise that
Zingales prefers Paul Ryan
over Mitt Romney. But Zingales is discouraged at the prospect
of Ryan throwing his hat into the Republican race:
Wisconsin congressman Paul Ryan says that he's not running, and
I assume he means it, but the GOP clearly needs a candidate more
like Ryan than like Mitt Romney, currently the party's leading
candidate and a favorite of the establishment. A candidate in
Ryan's mold, from the Jack Kemp tradition of libertarian
conservatives who helped make the GOP great, would be a strong
believer in free markets who is not beholden to the
bailout-addicted big-business establishment. This kind of
candidate, if the GOP could only find him, could win in 2012 and
help get the nation's economy back on track.
I don't know much about Michelle Bachmann, but Stephen Moore's
recent Wall Street Journal article about her was encouraging.
Imagine an elected official who reads von Mises while on vacation.
I am looking forward to the debates so I can learn which candidate
is the real deal on dealing with the budget and reducing the size
of government.
JimH| 6.17.11 @ 5:36PM
Reads Von Mises and still voted for the ethanol subsidies. That
means she knew better and did it anyway. I guess that's
Realpolitik.
Clint| 6.17.11 @ 6:42PM
"Amid a horrific financial crisis, all we hear are calls for
more of the money-printing, spending and subsidies that created
this mess. So I choose my great teacher, Ludwig von Mises, champion
of the Austrian School of economics, who taught us how a central
bank like the Fed causes booms and busts and how to build
prosperity through sound money and economic freedom."
Dr. Ron Paul
Siegfried X| 6.17.11 @ 5:48PM
Libertarianism is a loser, including Paul Ryan's. If it were
popular, the Libertarian Party would be running the government
instead of below 1% losers in every election.
Paul Ryan is no Jack Kemp. Kemp focused on growth, not budget
cuts.
Clint| 6.17.11 @ 6:39PM
“Ron Paul cannot get elected” President, declared Donald Trump
at this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference. Trump, who
has never run for office, let alone won an election, may want to
reconsider his parroting of this common refrain: A new CNN poll
finds that, of all the Republicans being discussed as potential
presidential candidates, the longtime Texas congressman has the
greatest chance of beating Barack Obama, while The Donald comes in
dead last.
In a hypothetical match-up between Paul and Obama, Obama beats
Paul by only seven percentage points (52 to 45 percent). Meanwhile,
Obama bests former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee by eight points,
former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney by 11 points, former
Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich by 17 points, former Alaska
Governor and vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin by 19 points,
and Trump by a whopping 22 points. (The poll, by the way, was taken
April 29 – May 1 and completed before Obama’s announcement of Osama
bin Laden’s death. It has a margin of error of plus or minus three
percentage points.)"
Brad9883| 6.18.11 @ 4:52AM
Or beat Obama with a Cain.
Bill Hussein O'Stalin| 6.18.11 @ 6:04AM
Although I'm against ethanol mandated usage one has to wonder
what will happen to the price of a gallon of gas when the ethanol
mafia is gone.
steven burton| 6.18.11 @ 9:23PM
Ryan has some good, solid ideas to start the conversation on
entitlement reform. His solutions are politically unworkable and
wouldn't even solve the debt crisis for decades. Add to that the
fact that he and his plan have already been framed in the common
media trope of callous Republican thinkng. I am a card-carrying
Republican, but I can see the ads against this widow-peaked
Wisconsin, with more than a passing resmeblance to Eddie Munster,
right now. Hell, we already have seen a few examples. He will be
killing granny and gramps or forcing them to work until age 100.
But the class warriors on the left won't stop there. They will
point out that while these "little people" are hurting, Mr. Ryan's
tax policies will make the rich even richer. Sometimes I don't
understand the complete lack of reasoning among some of my fellow
GOPers. The object is to win elections, not to feel morally
superior or ideologically self-satisfied. That is Democrat
territory; leave it to them. We need a common sense candidate who
can win the general election in 2012, not some purist or hero of
some minority faction within our party. Think about the disasters
of this administration. Do you seriously want to take the chance of
letting the fundamental transforming of America be completed?
Imagine what other leftist radicals might end up on the Supreme
Court; and whom might be replacing a conservative and thus making
for a liberal majority. Want to repeal Obamacare? Well lose big in
2012 and you will find that the law and the new entitlement will be
here to stay. More tomfoolery on the global scene . Ryan, Paul,
Palin, Bachmann and Santorum are all suicidal candidates for our
party. I don't know who the best candidate might be, but I know
those just mentioned are an invitation to an electoral
disaster.
Occam's Tool| 6.18.11 @ 10:00PM
I dunno. I think Bachman would do FIGURATIVELY what was done to
ZZ Top in "Under Pressure" on Obama in the election.
Bachman would destroy him. She would unleash her hidden BTO on
BO.
RJ| 6.17.11 @ 4:29PM
I don't know much about Michelle Bachmann, but Stephen Moore's recent Wall Street Journal article about her was encouraging. Imagine an elected official who reads von Mises while on vacation. I am looking forward to the debates so I can learn which candidate is the real deal on dealing with the budget and reducing the size of government.
JimH| 6.17.11 @ 5:36PM
Reads Von Mises and still voted for the ethanol subsidies. That means she knew better and did it anyway. I guess that's Realpolitik.
Clint| 6.17.11 @ 6:42PM
"Amid a horrific financial crisis, all we hear are calls for more of the money-printing, spending and subsidies that created this mess. So I choose my great teacher, Ludwig von Mises, champion of the Austrian School of economics, who taught us how a central bank like the Fed causes booms and busts and how to build prosperity through sound money and economic freedom."
Dr. Ron Paul
Siegfried X| 6.17.11 @ 5:48PM
Libertarianism is a loser, including Paul Ryan's. If it were popular, the Libertarian Party would be running the government instead of below 1% losers in every election.
Paul Ryan is no Jack Kemp. Kemp focused on growth, not budget cuts.
Clint| 6.17.11 @ 6:39PM
“Ron Paul cannot get elected” President, declared Donald Trump at this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference. Trump, who has never run for office, let alone won an election, may want to reconsider his parroting of this common refrain: A new CNN poll finds that, of all the Republicans being discussed as potential presidential candidates, the longtime Texas congressman has the greatest chance of beating Barack Obama, while The Donald comes in dead last.
In a hypothetical match-up between Paul and Obama, Obama beats Paul by only seven percentage points (52 to 45 percent). Meanwhile, Obama bests former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee by eight points, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney by 11 points, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich by 17 points, former Alaska Governor and vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin by 19 points, and Trump by a whopping 22 points. (The poll, by the way, was taken April 29 – May 1 and completed before Obama’s announcement of Osama bin Laden’s death. It has a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points.)"
Brad9883| 6.18.11 @ 4:52AM
Or beat Obama with a Cain.
Bill Hussein O'Stalin| 6.18.11 @ 6:04AM
Although I'm against ethanol mandated usage one has to wonder what will happen to the price of a gallon of gas when the ethanol mafia is gone.
steven burton| 6.18.11 @ 9:23PM
Ryan has some good, solid ideas to start the conversation on entitlement reform. His solutions are politically unworkable and wouldn't even solve the debt crisis for decades. Add to that the fact that he and his plan have already been framed in the common media trope of callous Republican thinkng. I am a card-carrying Republican, but I can see the ads against this widow-peaked Wisconsin, with more than a passing resmeblance to Eddie Munster, right now. Hell, we already have seen a few examples. He will be killing granny and gramps or forcing them to work until age 100. But the class warriors on the left won't stop there. They will point out that while these "little people" are hurting, Mr. Ryan's tax policies will make the rich even richer. Sometimes I don't understand the complete lack of reasoning among some of my fellow GOPers. The object is to win elections, not to feel morally superior or ideologically self-satisfied. That is Democrat territory; leave it to them. We need a common sense candidate who can win the general election in 2012, not some purist or hero of some minority faction within our party. Think about the disasters of this administration. Do you seriously want to take the chance of letting the fundamental transforming of America be completed? Imagine what other leftist radicals might end up on the Supreme Court; and whom might be replacing a conservative and thus making for a liberal majority. Want to repeal Obamacare? Well lose big in 2012 and you will find that the law and the new entitlement will be here to stay. More tomfoolery on the global scene . Ryan, Paul, Palin, Bachmann and Santorum are all suicidal candidates for our party. I don't know who the best candidate might be, but I know those just mentioned are an invitation to an electoral disaster.
Occam's Tool| 6.18.11 @ 10:00PM
I dunno. I think Bachman would do FIGURATIVELY what was done to ZZ Top in "Under Pressure" on Obama in the election.
Bachman would destroy him. She would unleash her hidden BTO on BO.
yisong| 10.30.11 @ 10:19PM
double-row reducing ball type slewing bearing. http://www.1stbearing.com