Last night, I saw Bill O’Reilly assert that
“left-wing loons” were responsible for the riots which took place
in Vancouver on Wednesday night after the Canucks lost Game 7 of
the Stanley Cup to the Boston Bruins. He also likened what occurred
in Vancouver to violence in Greece which has been taking place on
an ongoing basis over austerity measures introduced by their
government.
Personally, I have no use for left-wing loons who engage in
violence. They are certainly causing all kinds of problems in
Greece. But I am not sure this is what is in play in Vancouver. Now
I am aware that Vancouver Police Chief Jim Chu has blamed the riots
on “criminals
and anarchists” who
“had objectives.” However, Chu did not elaborate further
as to who these anarchists are and what exactly there objectives
were.
I am skeptical of O’Reilly’s analysis because I am not sure
if he is aware of the violence which took place in
Vancouver after the Canucks lost the Stanley Cup Finals to the New
York Rangers in 1994.
There certainly wasn’t a political dynamic in play at that
time.
Of course, there was left-wing violence in Vancouver during the
first couple of days during the 2010 Olympics which was organized
by the Olympics Resistance Network. Their expressed purpose was
“to
confront the 2010 games.” I am not aware of any kind of
formal resistance being organized around “confronting the Stanley
Cup.” But if there was, in fact, a deliberate plan set in
motion by anarchists to cause bedlam following Game 7 then why
didn’t the Vancouver Police take preventative security measures?
This question is well worth asking precisely because of what
occurred in Vancouver less than 18 months ago.
Left-wing loons who are committed to violence are a menace
and must not be countenanced. Yet I cannot help but think
that O’Reilly is jumping to conclusions here. If, as O’Reilly
suggests, the violence in Vancouver was as a result of government
taking away entitlements then who were these
anarchists protesting against? The City of Vancouver? The
province of British Columbia? Or the Harper government in Ottawa?
Absent more definitive information, likening the events of
Vancouver to Athens is but a classic case of comparing apples and
oranges. I am not discounting the possibility that the violence
could have been in part politically motivated. But that can only be
definitively concluded through a thorough investigation and there
hasn’t been enough time for that just yet.
John Navratil| 6.17.11 @ 10:04AM
Perhaps we should play all "finals" at Gitmo.
kingsmill| 6.17.11 @ 10:23AM
The Vancouver riots were planned and executed by a faction. The instigators were a vanguard, while the majority of the Canuckian sheep stood by and video captured them on their cell phones.
You have the violent, organizing faction and the passive, enabling mob of dolts.
Who is most accomplished at community organizing on this scale? The Left.
Bob K.| 6.17.11 @ 10:26AM
I doubt if it had anything to do with the Vancouver Economy.
I have a friend who visits Vancouver often from his home north of Seattle. He tells me that The Chinese coming in there can put $1 million dollars in a Vancouver Bank and become citizens of Canada in 1 month. He says that the landscape of Vancouver is starting to look like Hong Kong with all the new buildings going up. There is plenty of work for all.
David M. McClory| 6.17.11 @ 8:59PM
There is a political angle. The G8/G20 was in Toronto last summer and a lot of property damage ensued with no reaction. The next day, the police made up for this by beating a few and arresting many.
The firestorm afterward rightly took the police to task for day two, but nobody has looked at day one. This is simply a permission for troublemakers.
Christian Louboutin | 6.23.11 @ 5:38AM
Left-wing loons who are committed to violence are a menace and must not be countenanced. Yet I cannot help but think that O'Reilly is jumping to conclusions here. If, as O'Reilly suggests, the violence in Vancouver was as a result of government taking away entitlements then who were these anarchists protesting against? The City of Vancouver? The province of British Columbia? Or the
Jay B. | 6.28.11 @ 5:24AM
Riots in Vancouver after Game 7 are far more complicated. We can't just say it was politically motivated or all the rioters were simply hooligans. There was historical background of Canucks and their fans, social and psychological factors and, of course, preparation of city for the situation also played its role.