The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Last night, I saw Bill O’Reilly assert that “left-wing loons” were responsible for the riots which took place in Vancouver on Wednesday night after the Canucks lost Game 7 of the Stanley Cup to the Boston Bruins. He also likened what occurred in Vancouver to violence in Greece which has been taking place on an ongoing basis over austerity measures introduced by their government.

Personally, I have no use for left-wing loons who engage in violence. They are certainly causing all kinds of problems in Greece. But I am not sure this is what is in play in Vancouver. Now I am aware that Vancouver Police Chief Jim Chu has blamed the riots on “criminals and anarchists” who “had objectives.” However, Chu did not elaborate further as to who these anarchists are and what exactly there objectives were.

I am skeptical of O’Reilly’s analysis because I am not sure if he is aware of the violence which took place in Vancouver after the Canucks lost the Stanley Cup Finals to the New York Rangers in 1994. There certainly wasn’t a political dynamic in play at that time.

Of course, there was left-wing violence in Vancouver during the first couple of days during the 2010 Olympics which was organized by the Olympics Resistance Network. Their expressed purpose was “to confront the 2010 games.” I am not aware of any kind of formal resistance being organized around “confronting the Stanley Cup.” But if there was, in fact, a deliberate plan set in motion by anarchists to cause bedlam following Game 7 then why didn’t the Vancouver Police take preventative security measures? This question is well worth asking precisely because of what occurred in Vancouver less than 18 months ago.

Left-wing loons who are committed to violence are a menace and must not be countenanced. Yet I cannot help but think that O’Reilly is jumping to conclusions here. If, as O’Reilly suggests, the violence in Vancouver was as a result of government taking away entitlements then who were these anarchists protesting against? The City of Vancouver? The province of British Columbia? Or the Harper government in Ottawa? Absent more definitive information, likening the events of Vancouver to Athens is but a classic case of comparing apples and oranges. I am not discounting the possibility that the violence could have been in part politically motivated. But that can only be definitively concluded through a thorough investigation and there hasn’t been enough time for that just yet.

View all comments (6) |

John Navratil| 6.17.11 @ 10:04AM

Perhaps we should play all "finals" at Gitmo.

kingsmill| 6.17.11 @ 10:23AM

The Vancouver riots were planned and executed by a faction. The instigators were a vanguard, while the majority of the Canuckian sheep stood by and video captured them on their cell phones.

You have the violent, organizing faction and the passive, enabling mob of dolts.

Who is most accomplished at community organizing on this scale? The Left.

Bob K.| 6.17.11 @ 10:26AM

I doubt if it had anything to do with the Vancouver Economy.

I have a friend who visits Vancouver often from his home north of Seattle. He tells me that The Chinese coming in there can put $1 million dollars in a Vancouver Bank and become citizens of Canada in 1 month. He says that the landscape of Vancouver is starting to look like Hong Kong with all the new buildings going up. There is plenty of work for all.

David M. McClory| 6.17.11 @ 8:59PM

There is a political angle. The G8/G20 was in Toronto last summer and a lot of property damage ensued with no reaction. The next day, the police made up for this by beating a few and arresting many.

The firestorm afterward rightly took the police to task for day two, but nobody has looked at day one. This is simply a permission for troublemakers.

Christian Louboutin | 6.23.11 @ 5:38AM

Left-wing loons who are committed to violence are a menace and must not be countenanced. Yet I cannot help but think that O'Reilly is jumping to conclusions here. If, as O'Reilly suggests, the violence in Vancouver was as a result of government taking away entitlements then who were these anarchists protesting against? The City of Vancouver? The province of British Columbia? Or the

Jay B. | 6.28.11 @ 5:24AM

Riots in Vancouver after Game 7 are far more complicated. We can't just say it was politically motivated or all the rioters were simply hooligans. There was historical background of Canucks and their fans, social and psychological factors and, of course, preparation of city for the situation also played its role.

More Blog Posts by Aaron Goldstein

http://spectator.org/blog/2011/06/17/vancouver-riots-did-left-wing

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

The View From the Other Side

George H. Wittman | 5.17.13

From Bimbos to Benghazi

Jeffrey Lord | 5.9.13

ADVERTISEMENT