The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

It would be a mistake to read too much into such an early debate. Some observers have pointed out that it took Barack Obama a while to find his footing against Hillary Clinton in 2007-08. But Tim Pawlenty does need to find a way to criticize Mitt Romney effectively in future debates. If lines like “Obamneycare” aren’t his thing, then his team needs to find a way he can differentiate himself from Romney in his own voice.

Why? Because Pawlenty’s campaign is largely predicated on being a realistic conservative alternative to Romney. But that’s not a role he’s going to get simply because pundits think it makes sense for him to play it. He needs to distinguish himself from Cain, Bachmann, Gingrich, and the rest first.

View all comments (2) |

rightasrain| 6.14.11 @ 12:37PM

I like Pawlenty but he better re-tool before the next go-round. It's one thing to come out swinging against Obamneycare on the Sunday shows but when you can't even muster a mild critique when the guy is in the same room with you just makes you look craven.

Grzmlyk| 6.14.11 @ 1:07PM

Not only that, but Pawlenty's flirtation with cap-and-trade makes him a non-starter in my book.

He's not horrible - he's just a typical politician, and I think we need something more if we are ever to stanch the hemorhaging of our culture, our wealth, our moral fiber and our country.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2011/06/14/additional-obamneycare-thought

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

ADVERTISEMENT