One of the worst aspects of the financial regulation bill passed
last year was Sen. Richard Durbin’s success in acting as a lobbyist
for large retailers who wanted to pay less for debit
transactions. Pity Walmart and other major companies,
voiceless victims of the banks. For them Sen. Durbin won
passage of an amendment reducing so-called swipe fees.
Reported USA Today:
“It’s an outrage to make consumers across America pay this. They
pay it every time they use their debit cards, and the merchants and
retailers who collect it have no voice,” said the cap’s chief
proponent, Sen. Dick Durbin,
D-Ill.
My goodness. Consumers across America also have no voice
in what they pay for detergent, televisions, autos, and everything
else. I mean, some company somewhere DECIDES WHAT TO
CHARGE. Perhaps Majority Whip Durbin would like to set
every other price in the economy?
There is no “right” swipe rate, just as there is no right price
for anything else. The swipe rate should be a
market transaction based on the interaction of banks, stores, and
consumers. It certainly is not a matter for special
interest-minded politicians like Sen. Durbin.
However, the retailers, with Sen. Durbin in the lead, won
passage of an amendment authorizing the Federal Reserve to set
prices. The likely impact will be to increase fees for
consumers, though exactly who will pay what is hard to
predict. It’s worth asking Sen. Durbin why he wants to
transfer money from retailers to consumers, but I suppose the
former give larger campaign contributions.
The banks regrouped and on Wednesday lost an effort to delay the
new Fed rules to allow a study of the likely impact of federal
price-fixing. Naturally, the retailers would have none
of it. All they care about is saving money, courtesy the
Senator from Illinois. So it now looks like the rules will
take effect on July 1.
This is precisely the sort of special interest legislating that
appropriately brings Congress into further ill repute. One
wonders what corporate interest Sen. Durbin will next
champion against the consumer. So much for Democrats
being the self-anointed party of the people.
Conservative Bob| 6.10.11 @ 11:58AM
Looking at who voted which way on the delay amendment was not particularly encouraging either.. Like yesterdays You-tube lip sync bill.. too many of these clowns think if they don't pass something new everyday they are not "Serving".
I really think we would be better off if they workd part time.
PattyMor| 6.10.11 @ 5:13PM
I ask Dick Durban, do you represent the people or are you just a hired gun willing to do the work of the bidder with the highest price? Why is what the banks charge for fees any business of the federal gov'ment? Its not, and their meddling have left us bankrupt and unemployed.
c. j. acworth| 6.10.11 @ 6:16PM
"Perhaps majority whip Durban would like to set every other price in the economy"
Do you really want an answer to that question?
William| 6.11.11 @ 2:07PM
I think this article is a bit of a knee-jerk reaction to the fact Durbin was involved. The issue is not as simple as another dumb government regulation that will hurt consumers. Big retailers like Walmart already had the ability to negotiate waivers of the swipe fees. It was the smaller retailers who got hurt: they were locked in by rules imposed by the credit card companies and by practical reality from charging to cover the fee, so most just absorbed the loss on smaller purchases. There may have been a better way to correct this problem, but its hard to deny the existing situation was unfair for small businesses.