Maureen Dowd is plumbing new depths of wrongness. In her latest
Times
column, she attempted something difficult:
portraying Archbishop Diarmuid Martin of Dublin as a
savior and Pope Benedict XVI as a monster — without bringing any
facts to bear. The normally calm Michael Sean Winters
of the National Catholic Reporter had the misfortune
of stumbling across her piece, and
went off:
…the record of Pope Benedict in dealing with the sex abuse
crisis is far better than that of his predecessor and deserves a
better account than Dowd’s skewed vision permits. Again, such
complications would take away from the simple, Manichean worldview
that gives her little morality play its sense of clarity. But,
facts, too, provide clarity and Dowd, as a journalist, should
concern herself with them. Instead, she rants. I am glad she has
found an archbishop she likes and admires. Perhaps, once he is done
trying to help the Church of Ireland rediscover its soul the good
Archbishop of Dublin can help Ms. Dowd rediscover hers. But, good
luck finding it.
Yet the (soulless?) Ms. Dowd isn’t the only one to blame. As
Winters points out in his post, her article contains a number of
plain, simpler errors of fact about the Church. It would be
interesting to see if anyone could get a correction or two out of
the Times editors.
JP| 6.8.11 @ 2:49PM
I remember years ago (before the Priest Abuse scandals errupted), Dowd writing a piece about growing up as a Catholic. Her writing was full of cliches, and could have been penned by Andrew Greeley. She complained about being viewed as a "near occaison of sin" by the Church. Her point was that the Church never fully allowed her generation of Catholics (Baby Boomers) to express and enjoy thier sexuality. One should also remember, that before Femnism really hit its stride in the lates 70s/ early 80s, sexual liberation was all the rage. He generation fully supported Roman Polanski (the famous director who raped drugged and raped a 14 year old girl); sodomy, homosexuality, and sex with underage children was fully supported by the Boomers until Feminism and age began to tone down thier libido. And during that period, many clergy committed thier crimes.
And now almost 60 years old, Dowd ignores the damage her generation did. Somehow, I cannot take her seriously.
Billy| 6.8.11 @ 3:16PM
Dowd ignores the damage the LEFTISTS in her generation did. Please get your facts straight.
JP| 6.8.11 @ 3:58PM
I think Billy that you need to understand irony. My point being, she and her generation celebrated 30 years ago the very acts that she now detests.