-
Peter Wehner Responds
June 19, 2013 | 4 comments
-
Cummings Accused of Subverting IRS Investigation
June 19, 2013 | 5 comments
-
Gerson, Wehner, and the Losing Old Ways Crowd
June 18, 2013 | 18 comments
-
Hannity: Secure the Border First
June 17, 2013 | 6 comments
-
Charles Krauthammer and The Limbaugh Theorem
June 14, 2013 | 27 comments
The Spectacle Blog
Well.
MSNBC steps up to the plate and suspends Ed Schultz. “Unacceptable” says the network of calling Laura Ingraham…well…go look it up.
This was just disgraceful. Anybody in the public eye — including Laura Ingraham — has to take as well as dish. A fact of life, and overall a good one. But this was so far over the line — with clear deliberate intent — it was just appalling.
Here’s how Laura Ingraham responded:
Re. the crude comments made about me by Ed Schultz on his radio program: First, I was surprised to learn that Ed Schultz actually hosted a radio show. Is it only available online? Second, I have to get back to recording the audio edition of my new book “Of Thee I Zing.” Now I’m tempted to insert one additional zing — about men who preach civility but practice misogyny.
One could go on… about liberals and their real attitude towards women and so on and on (and on and on). But this succinct statement from Ms. Ingraham sums it up.
Enough said.
View all comments (21) | Leave a comment
More Blog Posts by Jeffrey Lord
http://spectator.org/blog/2011/05/25/msnbc-suspends-schultz-over-in
Follow us:
ADVERTISEMENT
Current Issue
- How Not To Buy a Fighter
- Overheated Frauds and Fools
- There’s Something About Cambridge
SPONSORED LINKS
FLASHBACK TO: 1995
-
Pope Culture
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
-
Why the GOP Does Not, Like, Totally Suck
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
-
Dames at Sea
-
In the Absence of Guns
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
-
The Metaphysical Martini
-
Counting the Costs of Clintonism
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
-
Chuck McHagel
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
-
The Legacy of Old John and Mother Fresh-Roasted
-
It’s the Best Time of the Year
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
-
The Bush Crack-Up
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Clip of the Day
ADVERTISEMENT
Sardonikus| 5.25.11 @ 11:59PM
Bottom Line: Ed Schultz is a pig-eyed sack of sh*t. (Apologies to Dabney Coleman for recycling his WarGames quote.)
NO RINO ROMNEY| 5.26.11 @ 12:45AM
I watched Schultz's apology and I was surprised how genuinely contrite he appeared. It was a real apology and Schultz was actually classy. Shocking I know.
Sarah Palin's been called much worse and none of those dirtbags ever apologizes to her (which pisses me off to the max!).
wodiej| 5.26.11 @ 5:47AM
I agree but Palin is more of a threat to the fabric of the liberal agenda so the onslaught of vulgar behavior will continue unabated.
Chuckie| 5.26.11 @ 3:05PM
She is a threat it's true. The left is so ugly; sometimes I think they're satanic.
Real American| 5.26.11 @ 12:58AM
Why is the left so vulgar? I'm thinking immaturity and lack of class and shame.
LarryK| 5.26.11 @ 6:59AM
Because, the left has no standards, moral compass, belief in absolutes, - Remember the famous line from "Star Wars - Revenge of the Sith", "Only Sith Lords deal in absolutes."
By inference The Creator is a Sith Lord. The last time I looked at the 10 commandments, they seemed pretty absolute.
The Left ony deals with gray areas not believing in absolutes.
SpiralArchitect| 5.26.11 @ 2:59PM
The liberals work on an emothion level whereas conservatives on a logical level.
Emotion spews, knee-jerks re-actions. Logic requires thought then people reflect upon the thought and refrain from saying things that are inappropriate.
To know foul language is far seperated from using foul language, esp. indescrimanatly.
beebop| 5.26.11 @ 5:43AM
What about this comes as a shock? Democrats who supported HRC were called every vile name in the book. If that is what they do to their own, what they do to those with whom they cannot disagree in polite fashion should come as no surprise. I bet Bill Mahar is kicking himself that Eddy is getting all of this attention. Imagine ....
wodiej| 5.26.11 @ 5:45AM
What's with all the immature, juvenile name calling by liberals anyway? For crying out loud, for all of their bragging about being more educated than the unwashed masses, they act like a bunch of punks.
SpiralArchitect| 5.26.11 @ 3:00PM
If they were in fact (more) educated they would realize the invalidity of such comments. :)
Deborah D | 5.26.11 @ 6:39AM
When you can't make a cohesive argument against someone, you must resort to name calling. Thus, liberals' way of arguing.
Timothy L. Pennell| 5.26.11 @ 8:53AM
He calls her a SLUT, not once, but TWICE, on his witless, viewerless Show, and He's not FIRED? How does he keep his job? How does that SLUT - Maddow - keep her job? What about that SLUT - Pelosi - and all of her Obamacare Waivers? What about that SLUT - Feinstein - and her assertions that: "Enhanced Interrogation, to my knowledge, had nothing to do with getting information on Bin Laden"? And, let's not forget the other SLUTS: Lousie Slaughter, Wasserman Shultz. Boxer, McCaskill, and the Wife of the Rapist - Hillary SLUT Clinton. Actually, it would be simpler to name the Democrat Broads, who AREN'T Sluts.
How does Mathews keep his job. How does Cink, Cenk, Stink, whatever his name is, keep his job? How can MSNBC still be on the air? They have NO VIEWERS. NO RATINGS. And, yet, there they are. That's because GE, which owns NBC, which owns MSNBC, paid NO TAXES this year, on $50 BILLION in Profits, in this Country, alone. And, WHY, pray tell, do they get away with that? Why is GE good, and BIG OIL, bad? Because GE owns NBC, which owns MSNBC, which will stay on the air, no matter what, so it can run Cover, make Excuses, repeat the Talking Points, Project, and SLANDER anyone who would dare to go up against their MESSIAH. And THAT, is why this piece of SOCIALIST garbage, has still got his job. Goebbels would be proud. SIEG HEIL!
Greg Scandlen| 5.26.11 @ 11:27AM
Now let's see if MSNBC disciplines Mika Barezhinski for saying Glenn Beck has no morals on Wednesday's Morning Joe.
Chuckie| 5.26.11 @ 3:07PM
Why? She didn't call Glenn a slut.
Oldefarte| 5.26.11 @ 1:26PM
And to think that a very beacon of [homosexual] chastity precedes him on their network's lineup, and yet he's too stupid to see the sometimes be-speckled SLUT practically in front of his fat nose!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
sister frances| 5.27.11 @ 8:30AM
All you republicans are just so angry that you have no one to go up against President Obama. You are the angry, hateful group. I belong to the Demoractic party because of that - we care about all people - republicans are all about the money - they want it ALL. wake-up!!! Oh and please nominate Sarah Palin.
Nick| 5.27.11 @ 4:40PM
Sister Satan,
You belong to the democrat party because you had a lobotomy.
SoCon| 5.27.11 @ 7:07PM
LOL! You always make me laugh, Nick.
Nick| 5.27.11 @ 7:37PM
Thanks, SoCon, I aim to please!
weddingdress | 6.29.11 @ 5:40AM
All you republicans are just so angry that you have no one to go up against President Obama. You are the angry, hateful group. I belong to the Demoractic party because of that - we care about all people - republicans are all about the money - they want it ALL. wake-up!!! Oh and please nominate Sarah Palin.