The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Josh Rogin reports that Jimmy Carter and the rest of the group of washed-up leaders and diplomats who pompously call themselves “the Elders” couldn’t get a meeting at the State Department this week. He passes along this tidbit from an April 29 report from Chris Nelson’s daily newsletter, which makes me like Hillary Clinton more:

The performance of President Carter and his delegation in N. Korea this week was either shameful or fatuous…or both…and exemplifies why Carter had no…zero…USG support going in, and even less coming out, per an alleged eye witness account of Sec. St. Clinton at the morning meeting the other day:

“Do you want to meet with Carter?” Clinton is looking at papers, and just says “No.” Then she pauses, looks up and adds, “HELL no!!!”

Rogin explains the context:

Besides going to North Korea without any administration support, Carter alienated Washington’s policy community when he declared at a Seoul press conference on April 28 that “to deliberately withhold food aid to the North Korean people because of political or military issues not related is really indeed a human rights violation.”

Former NSC Senior Director for Asia Victor Cha just happened to be in Seoul that day, staying in the same hotel as the Elders, and said that people in South Korea were very upset at Carter’s remark.

“People who work on the food issue with North Korea know the very real problems of diversion to the military, and Carter’s statement implied that China — because it gives food unconditionally to North Korea — is more of a human rights upholder in North Korea than the others, which was not well-received,” Cha told The Cable.

It was unnerving when National Security Adviser Tom Donilon took a meeting with Carter in November, and it’s heartening to know that US policymakers want nothing to do with him now.

View all comments (6) |

simon templar| 5.18.11 @ 1:19AM

Maybe he and Ron Paul can form a coalition of crazed old kooks who should be asked to retire from public service. Every day they share more in common.

Clint| 5.18.11 @ 4:47AM

"According to a 1998 study published in the American Journal of Political Science, Paul had the most conservative voting record of any member of Congress since 1937.

"Ron Paul is one of the outstanding leaders fighting for a stronger national defense. As a former Air Force officer, he knows well the needs of our armed forces, and he always puts them first. We need to keep him fighting for our country."
-Ronald Reagan

Occam's Tool| 5.18.11 @ 10:51PM

Yes, before 2001. 2001 changed EVERYTHING. He votes with Kucinich now.

As for Carter, he's a traitor.

daveinboca| 5.18.11 @ 1:45AM

At last I agree with Hillary on SOMETHING! Jimmy Carter is giving doddering old fools committing robo-drool a bad name. And the other "elder," Gro Harlem Gruntland, an ex-Socialist Prime Minister from Norway, is one of the five members of the Nobel Peace Prize Cte who keeps giving idiots like Carter and Gore and Obama Peace Prizes they don't deserve.

Sophia| 5.18.11 @ 9:33AM

I said HEYELL NAW.

Occam's Tool| 5.19.11 @ 2:17AM

G-d, I hate Carter. And Paul agrees with him on foreign policy.

More Blog Posts by John Tabin

http://spectator.org/blog/2011/05/17/good-news-foggy-bottom-snubs-c

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal

Jeffrey Lord | 6.18.13

Foreign Policy as Farce

Jed Babbin | 6.17.13

The Biggest Fool of All

Doug Bandow | 6.17.13

Can Liturgical Music Be Saved?

Patrick O'Hannigan | 6.17.13

Revenge of the Fruitcakes

Peter Hitchens | 6.17.13

Obama's Climate of Intimidation

Matthew Sheffield | 6.18.13

The Mole in Don Draper

James Bowman | 6.17.13

Whither Suburbia?

Steven Greenhut | 6.18.13

ADVERTISEMENT