The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Politico’s story “Huntsman on Cap and Trade: ‘It hasn’t worked’”, opens :

“Jon Huntsman is backing away from his support for a cap-and-trade system for Western states that he once championed as Utah  

‘It hasn’t worked,’ the potential GOP presidential candidate told Time Magazine in his first extended interview since leaving his post as U.S. ambassador to China. ‘And our economy’s in a different place than five years ago.’

Until the economy recovers, Huntsman added, ‘this isn’t the moment’ to implement it.

But, you said it hasn’t worked.

So unfortunately, once again a Republican candidate’s cap-n-trade jig appears somewhat sophisticated. Parsed, this one says:

It hasn’t worked.

I supported it when the economy was in a good place.

This sort of economy makes supporting it now a bad idea.

When the economy’s recovered things will be different. At that time, things that have proved not to work are ok.

I believe the above accurately reflects candidate Huntsman’s position as articulated to Politico, but I invite readers to tell me where this might be unfair.

In checking for myself first, I dug around to pressure-test the sincerity of this — for example, did Huntsman sell the climate shtick as a jobs/pro-economic growth measure at the time? If so, why is it now a bad idea? You say it’s the economy. Is there a reason we should think it’s not just the polls?

And even though Politico also wrote the following, oddly, I kept finding examples of Huntsman’s history on the issue leading to web pages that are no longer available, or which redirected me to others:

“Like the others, Huntsman’s views on climate legislation live on via the Internet. He partnered in 2007 with then-California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer in a nationally-televised Environmental Defense Fund commercial urging Congress to pass legislation capping greenhouse gases.”

For example, the story which used to be found here: http://www.sltrib.com/News/ci_11034842

I see it teased on one site.

Guv carries climate message to White House
Energy policy » Western governors have a proposal
By Thomas Burr, Salt Lake Tribune, 11/21/08

Washington » Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. and Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer meet this morning with President-elect Barack Obama’s top transition leader to deliver a bipartisan energy proposal from Western governors.

The plan, supported by 14 Western governors, includes what Huntsman labeled a “road map” for the new administration and includes a so-called cap-and-trade program, goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and increasing renewable energies, and suggestions for weaning the country off foreign sources of oil.

But this story, like all sorts of others I encountered on a search, only to chase to a dead end, is just not to be found. Only the above blurb on this lefty activist news-aggregator site compiling relevant stories.

But it provides some insight. Notably, this was Huntsman’s pitch to President Obama (which, his subsequent job indicates, impressed the President-elect). After the 2008 election, which itself was greatly impacted and ultimately defined by the economic downturn. That’s not exactly 5 years ago. It is also not exactly when we were in flush economic times. Arguably, things were worse. Mr. Huntsman should ask his chief advisor, John Weaver. He was chief advisor to pro-cap-n-trade nominee John McCain back then.

But yet, we see Gov. Huntsman was pushing it as a model for the country then.

So what we see is another guy trying to be slick, to avoid saying “Bad idea. But, can I still have credit for the ask? I won’t swear off it.” Not mature. Trying to have it every way. Not trustworthy.

And, incidentally, this is not, as the press keeps spinning it, evidence of the perils of a changing sentiment in the Republican base. This represents the perils of candidates with no apparent center, terrible instincts, or simply terrible judgment seeking to woo the media and “the middle” that their consultants keep telling them is where the race is won.

It’s won on principle.

Still waiting.

View all comments (10) |

dc| 5.13.11 @ 1:45PM

Anyone who supports or supported the "ration & tax" energy scheme (actually, anyone who's not fighting the EPA's administrative implementation of it right now) is, prima facie, a socialist elitist trying to dress up totalitarianism in soft green colors.
Rationing energy is part of a larger scheme, the sort of "reverse Pol Pot" regime that most Demoncrats and certainly all of Il Duce Nero's folks desperately want to establish. In order to herd Americans into more easily controlled Bronx-tenement style housing, the key thing they must do is to make energy absurdly expensive, thus beyond the reach of all but the "rich". (And the "rich," Il Duce Nero hopes, will either fall into line with his plan (trying to preserve what they have), or if they don't, the government will simply confiscate their property on whatever pretext is most convenient at the time). Anyway, after herding enough Americans into relatively smaller, controllable spaces, the eco-totalitarians will be able to more easily ration consumption of energy, and dole out energy, power, gasoline, etc only to those who have successfully won political favor. Once energy rationing is established, rationing other things won't be hard at all. After all, health care will already have been rationed. The pliant, fascist Fed will ration dollars within the country while continuing to devalue the currency abroad. And Americans will effectively have sold themselves as slaves.
Now, neither Huntsman nor McCain will admit this is what the end game is. McCain probably just didn't have the intellectual candlepower to think it through. But inevitably, this is the goal. And if it isn't your goal, then you shouldn't even take one step down the path with those whose goal it is.
Side note: any Republican candidate who thinks having McCain's campaign people working for him is a net plus rather than a destructive liability deserves what he gets, which is single digit vote %ages in the Republican primaries.

Occam's Tool| 5.13.11 @ 8:15PM

Crap economic policy based on crap science.

Bob| 5.13.11 @ 2:11PM

Huntsman/Romney a ticket Smith/Young and their 8o wives would absolutely love. Two guarantees they would win Utah but lose DC.

PattyMor| 5.13.11 @ 4:06PM

No to any politican who has flirted with global warming/global climate change/global climate disruption or cap and trade. So into the reject pile goes Huntsman, along with Newt Gingrich, and TPAW.

I don't another DC mastermind in the White House. We barely survived GB I and the Bamster. Only free marketers, drill here drill now, and let's get rid of the EPA types need apply.

Wayne | 5.13.11 @ 4:17PM

Is he Obama's hand-picked GOP candidate?

NikFromNYC| 5.13.11 @ 4:29PM

Tide gauges refute alarmism: http://oi56.tinypic.com/11jsp5i.jpg
So do thermometers: http://oi51.tinypic.com/357pvme.jpg

NikFromNYC| 5.13.11 @ 4:29PM

So does the global average: http://i49.tinypic.com/2mpg0tz.jpg
So do dozens of temperature reconstructions, e.g.: http://oi52.tinypic.com/2upvlvm.jpg

NikFromNYC| 5.13.11 @ 4:29PM

So do serious left wing intellectuals: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n92YenWfz0Y
But at least psychopaths support it: http://oi54.tinypic.com/wrm3xc.jpg

Ned the Red| 5.14.11 @ 9:33AM

Remember the George Carlin joke about his name.  He said he could never get laid because of it. If a hooker was calling from an second story window, asking who was there and the answer was Tito, Chico, and George.  She would reply, "Tell George to wait." Mitt, Jon, I think they would be waiting also.

yisong| 10.31.11 @ 2:25AM

single row four point contact ball slewing bearing. http://www.1stbearing.com

More Blog Posts by Chris Horner

http://spectator.org/blog/2011/05/13/huntsman-latest-too-clever-cli

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

The View From the Other Side

George H. Wittman | 5.17.13

From Bimbos to Benghazi

Jeffrey Lord | 5.9.13

ADVERTISEMENT