So what did the Supreme Court decide at its meeting last Friday
about whether to expedite the state of Virginia’s Obamacare case
directly to the high court, as the state has requested? According
to Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, there was no
announcement today. All we know is that “they relisted the case on
their docket for this Friday, April 22nd.” What does this mean?
Here’s the email Cuccinelli sent out Monday evening:
The United States Supreme Court Justices met last Friday
to discuss whether or not to grant Virginia’s request to expedite
our healthcare case directly to the Supreme Court - thereby
bypassing the 4th Circuit
Court of Appeals.
Virginia, along with many other states and companies, has
been left with great uncertainty regarding the healthcare bill.
Virginia alone is spending millions of dollars preparing to
implement the bill - despite the fact that if Virginia’s legal
challenge succeeds, the bill may well be stricken before it is ever
fully implemented.
The Supreme Court did not make an announcement today on
whether or not it was going to expedite the case. Instead, they
relisted the case on their docket for this Friday, April
22nd.
What does that mean?
It means that they haven’t rejected our request - yet.
Remember, requests to expedite are infrequently granted. However,
it also probably means that one or more of the Justices want more
time to consider the question.
It also means that there appears at least to be interest
in the petition at the court, which is itself encouraging. If my
numbers are right, over 90% of petitions addressed in these
conferences are summarily rejected because no Justice has any
interest in them. So, the fact that the Justices didn’t summarily
dismiss our petition is itself interesting and at least modestly
encouraging (hopefully not in the vein of what your mother told you
growing up: “the worst thing they can do is ignore you”… of
course, my mother has never filed a petition with the Supreme
Court).
Generally speaking, we would expect an opinion issued
Monday the 25th; however, it
is Easter weekend, so I don’t know if that will have an impact on
timing, but I’ll let you know as soon as we find out!
Stay tuned.
Have you considered| 4.19.11 @ 6:47AM
If this case is Not worthy of expedited review, what case could ever possibly be?
I wonder if the justices understand that this issue is so fundamental to We The People, and that It Is A Hill Worth Dieing Upon?
Additionally, I have often wondered why in the 1st Amendment there is a right "to petition the government for redress of grievance" yet without a corresponding duty for the case to be heard, is this not a hollow "right"?
Richard Baker| 4.19.11 @ 11:24AM
The Lords Temporal seem to think that they are the final arbiter in all things because John Marshall said so. Many of us beg to differ. Show me in the Constitution where the "Honorable Court" possesses this god-like power.