The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

So what did the Supreme Court decide at its meeting last Friday about whether to expedite the state of Virginia's Obamacare case directly to the high court, as the state has requested? According to Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, there was no announcement today. All we know is that "they relisted the case on their docket for this Friday, April 22nd." What does this mean?

Here's the email Cuccinelli sent out Monday evening:

The United States Supreme Court Justices met last Friday to discuss whether or not to grant Virginia's request to expedite our healthcare case directly to the Supreme Court - thereby bypassing the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Virginia, along with many other states and companies, has been left with great uncertainty regarding the healthcare bill. Virginia alone is spending millions of dollars preparing to implement the bill - despite the fact that if Virginia's legal challenge succeeds, the bill may well be stricken before it is ever fully implemented. 

The Supreme Court did not make an announcement today on whether or not it was going to expedite the case. Instead, they relisted the case on their docket for this Friday, April 22nd.

What does that mean?

It means that they haven't rejected our request - yet. Remember, requests to expedite are infrequently granted. However, it also probably means that one or more of the Justices want more time to consider the question.

It also means that there appears at least to be interest in the petition at the court, which is itself encouraging. If my numbers are right, over 90% of petitions addressed in these conferences are summarily rejected because no Justice has any interest in them. So, the fact that the Justices didn't summarily dismiss our petition is itself interesting and at least modestly encouraging (hopefully not in the vein of what your mother told you growing up: "the worst thing they can do is ignore you"... of course, my mother has never filed a petition with the Supreme Court). 

Generally speaking, we would expect an opinion issued Monday the 25th; however, it is Easter weekend, so I don't know if that will have an impact on timing, but I'll let you know as soon as we find out!

Stay tuned.

View all comments (2) | Leave a comment

Have you considered| 4.19.11 @ 6:47AM

If this case is Not worthy of expedited review, what case could ever possibly be?

I wonder if the justices understand that this issue is so fundamental to We The People, and that It Is A Hill Worth Dieing Upon?

Additionally, I have often wondered why in the 1st Amendment there is a right "to petition the government for redress of grievance" yet without a corresponding duty for the case to be heard, is this not a hollow "right"?

Richard Baker| 4.19.11 @ 11:24AM

The Lords Temporal seem to think that they are the final arbiter in all things because John Marshall said so. Many of us beg to differ. Show me in the Constitution where the "Honorable Court" possesses this god-like power.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Wlady Pleszczynski

http://spectator.org/blog/2011/04/18/the-supreme-court-and-cuccinel

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT