The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

In Praise of William Rusher

Sadly, I haven’t seen quite enough conservative encomiums today in memory of Bill Rusher, the longtime National Review publisher who died Saturday, who was one of the greatest, most important people in the whole conservative movement. Without Bill Rusher, it is absolutely safe and incontrovertible to say, there would have been no Goldwater nomination in 1964, and quite likely no campaign at all. The impetus for the campaign came straight from Rusher. He’s the one who made it happen, and with the phenomenal assistance of Clif White, the great political operative, it did happen, despite longstanding opposition (real opposition, not feigned) from candidate Goldwater himself. It was a true “draft” movement the likes of which will probably never be equalled again in American politics. When Goldwater finally came around, the campaign was waiting for him, painstakingly built for some three years by Rusher and White. (It was a mark against Goldwater, by the way, that once the nomination was secured, Goldwater allowed Rusher and White to be effectively shunted to the sidelines.)

Moreover, it was Rusher who did all the grunt work of keeping National Review afloat for 30 years, providing the steady organizational/financial leadership while WF Buckley of course provided the editorial inspiration. Anybody who understands the conservative movement, and anybody who understands the movement’s essential centrality to American history in the past half-century, knows how important National Review was. Sure, it was Buckley’s baby — but Rusher deserves a large chunk of the credit for helping Buckley keep it afloat.

Urbane, insightful, incisive and erudite, Bill Rusher was a giant of the cause. May he rest in peace, and in God’s eternal grace and joy.

View all comments (6) |

Hunter Baker| 4.18.11 @ 9:23PM

Agree entirely, except to say that Buckley did more than provide editorial inspiration. He kept up a grueling speaking schedule for decades for the financial benefit of National Review.

Ken (Old Texican)| 4.18.11 @ 9:41PM

Thanks for the shout out, Quin.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgRibR6bgcE

jocon307 | 4.19.11 @ 1:39AM

This is a very nice obit, let us always remember "who brung us" and may Mr. Rusher RIP.

Paul Windels| 4.19.11 @ 7:16AM

RIP to a good man who fought the good fight.

Bob K.| 4.19.11 @ 7:41AM

We tend to forget that there was no real conservative movement in US history until after WW II and that it is still undergoing growing pains.

Rusher probably was the most important figure in making it cohesive.

Thank you for this remembrance. May he Rest In Peace.

Michael| 4.19.11 @ 2:04PM

William Rusher was a great founding father of the conservative movement (in spite of believing that Goldwater was a conservative). His work led to eight years of Reagan. That is a tribute.

More Blog Posts by Quin Hillyer

http://spectator.org/blog/2011/04/18/in-praise-of-william-rusher

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal

Jeffrey Lord | 6.18.13

Foreign Policy as Farce

Jed Babbin | 6.17.13

The Biggest Fool of All

Doug Bandow | 6.17.13

Can Liturgical Music Be Saved?

Patrick O'Hannigan | 6.17.13

Revenge of the Fruitcakes

Peter Hitchens | 6.17.13

Obama's Climate of Intimidation

Matthew Sheffield | 6.18.13

Whither Suburbia?

Steven Greenhut | 6.18.13

The Mole in Don Draper

James Bowman | 6.17.13

ADVERTISEMENT