Robert Samuelson’s latest op-ed
is “The real GE scandal.” His point in brief is that the problem is
not so much GE’s gaming the tax system to pay little or no federal
income tax despite a $5 billion profit from US operations, in as
much as it is the tax system which encourages and even engineers
such gaming (though
it seems GE is in fact paying taxes for 2010).
True, but the deeper problem here because the subject happens to
be GE is GE’s simultaneous use of the federal government to create
laws governing those of us, the individual taxpayers, less able to
mold and game the tax code and therefore who pay more for the
federal government — and those policies.
Oh, and given GE receives much of its revenue from these
policies we are also those who pay for GE’s employees, whose income
taxes GE seeks to wrap itself in, in defense of its own
near-free-riding.
The scandal is Members of Congress paying disproportionate heed
to rent-seekers like GE, with its enormous lobby shop working into
place policies A though Z, to take from us and give to them what
they cannot obtain through innovation or market competition. And
Team Obama, stop heeding GE’s CEO placed at the president’s ear to
further advocate such goodies for said near-free-rider.
Listen instead to those of us who are underwriting the
government, and this series of policies like GE’s pet windmill
mandate. That scheme, soon to move to the floor of the Senate,
became a priority thanks GE’s fire-sale purchase of Enron wind,
apparently picking up Enron’s lobbying plan as part of the
deal.
The ‘clean energy economy’ plans, as much or more than any of
GE’s schemes, are nominally designed and imposed to lower the
temperature, create (implicitly, net) jobs, reduce resource
consumption and lower pollution levels — not one of which things
they would actually accomplish, much of which the American
Tradition Institute argues in federal court in
this lawsuit filed yesterday.
Big Business loves Big Goverment. They just want someone else to
pay for it. That someone else would be you.
So, hey, my government: stop listening to free-riding Paul
explain how to best rob Peter.
Do the right thing, instead. Like with windmill mandates, any
business line whose promoter insists requires federal schemes in
order to prosper or even exist should be dealt with by allowing it
to not prosper or not exist as the merits dictate. That’s how the
rest of us fare when what we’re selling people don’t want to
buy.
Until Washington grasps this, we will never fix the economic
hole we are in directly thanks to Washington, and such reckless
economic stewardship.
PattyMor| 4.5.11 @ 3:28PM
Not only do they lobby for grants to produce inefficient wind mills and solar panels, then they game the system by mandating purchases of their high cost energy. Its a policy by the well connected and for the well connected and screw the people.
We need to answer the question, are our congresspeople really our representative or are they just hired guns of the rich selling their votes to the highest bidders?
Jonah| 4.5.11 @ 3:42PM
Big Government+Big Business = Corruptocracy.
Electing RINOs will not defeat this bulwark.
Sean| 4.5.11 @ 5:08PM
These big businesses also provide good paying jobs for all the out of work politicians and bureaucrats. It seems like the IRS and tax writing commissions are to GE like the FED and Treasury are to Goldman Sachs.
Dollface| 4.5.11 @ 10:15PM
Don't forget, GE are the ones behind those funny looking, expensive, mercury filled lightbulbs.
JimH| 4.6.11 @ 8:29AM
Too many times Republicans are seen proclaiming support for the free market while being in the tank for these large corporations. For the party and its members to have credibility they must make clear that support for the market and private property is not the same as support for big business. The Tea Partiers know this. Establishment Republicans act as if they do not. The Dems use this to advantage even though behind the scenes they are even bigger whores for corporate welfare.
Irish22| 4.6.11 @ 7:46PM
Stop subsidies, end corporate taxes (we pay them anyway), allow the market to decide the products and services offered and purchased.
Simple eh?