Yesterday I noted a poll that showed Donald Trump at 10 percent
in a national Republican presidential preference poll. He seems to
take support about equally from Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, Newt
Gingrich, Sarah Palin, and Ron Paul. Aside from Tim Pawlenty, they
are the only candidates with noticeable pockets of support. So this
has raised questions about whether a Trump campaign would be more
than a publicity stunt. I’m skeptical for the following
reasons.
1. How liquid is Trump? In determining how
financially competitive Trump would be with Romney, the key figure
isn’t net worth. It’s how much ready cash he has to spend on a
presidential campaign. There are
good reasons to question whether Trump is really in a position
to drop that much dough on a presidential campaign.
2. How conservative is Trump? The last time he
flirted with a presidential bid, Trump floated the idea of a wealth
tax and criticized social conservatives. Since then, he has tacked
to the right on a number of issues and talked about Obama’s birth
certificate. Does this guy stand for anything?
3. Are Republicans ready to go the celebrity
route? Conservatives have a habit of criticizing liberal
celebrities for their political pronouncements — “Shut up and
sing,” as Laura Ingraham puts it — and then latching on to any
B-list celebrity who expresses a conservative opinion or endorses a
Republican candidate. But Donald Trump isn’t Chuck Norris or Ted
Nugent. He’s a Paris Hilton/Britney Spears-style celebrity. I’m not
sure that would sit well with the Republican primary
electorate.
4. Would he really want to disclose his assets and other
financial information? Financial disclosure is often a
major sticking point for for super-wealthy candidates and it has
deterred celebrities from running for office before. If Trump
somehow got elected, I doubt he would want to put everything into a
blind trust. That didn’t work out so well for Jimmy Carter.
5. We’ve been down this road before. Jesse
Ventura tried to recruit Trump to run for the Reform Party
presidential nomination in 2000. Trump left the GOP the same day
Pat Buchanan did in 1999, setting the stage for a contest where the
Ventura faction of the party would back Trump and the Ross Perot
faction would back Buchanan. The early indicators had Buchanan
beating Trump, who consequently decided not to run. Both Ventura
and Trump left the Reform Party. Buchanan and Trump eventually both
returned to the GOP.
Now if you can’t buy the nomination of a minor political party,
which was by then in decline, and beat a candidate who was no
longer at the peak of his popularity and was threatening to
transform the Reformers from a centrist party into a right-wing
one, it’s hard to see you being able to buy the Republican
nomination. Much less beat established candidates who are in line
with the GOP platform.
Alan Brooks| 3.24.11 @ 10:32AM
Trump is too honest to be president. I saw him on TV and he was saying exactly what he thought. Why, that's practically subversive. Naturally, when you are as high up as Trump is, you can say what you want-- IF you want to. And if you dump your wife for Marla Maples, you can say "adultery is no sin", and get away with it-- because you are so high up, of course.
Oldefarte| 3.24.11 @ 11:42AM
Oh, you mean like HILLYBILLY?????????
Will| 3.24.11 @ 10:58AM
Never could take the guy and his evil hair, but since I heard that he went on television and (drumroll) asked "the question", I'm beginning to rethink my opinions.
Kenny| 3.24.11 @ 11:03AM
Trump is a salesman, if not an out-and-out huskester.
And politically speaking, Trump would be more at home in the Libertarian Party that in the GOP which is heavily tilted towards social conservatives.
Mike| 3.24.11 @ 11:32AM
Trump can not win, period.
Oldefarte| 3.24.11 @ 11:40AM
Although his fiscal/business ability to make precise decisions would be a plus, he'd no doubt get slaughtered by those critical of his social/marriage agenda; and as stated, who knows what his political philosophies are. Similarly, the NY businessman Republican who ran for governor had this decision making ability, but got caught in the Democrats' crosshairs over his honest speech/proclamations. Trump would be good as an appointed presidential czar-type tasked with defecit/debt reduction policies [and behind the political scenes], but not as a presidential candidate!!!!!!!!!
Conservative View| 3.24.11 @ 11:56AM
My first reaction to the idea of D. Trump running for President was something between a snort and a laugh. But, then, I thought about it a little. Sure, he is one hell of a self permoter. Sure, he has "sinned" in the past. Sure, he has trouble with wives. But then - - -
What are the real problems faceing our country today? First, we are out of money. We're broke, busted, all but bankrupt. But Donald has been bankrupt. He knows what needs to be done to turn things around. He perhaps more than anyone whoes hat is in the ring knows how it feels.
Second problem facing our country, the Mid East. Here is a man that has delt with them. He knows them. He rented Gaddiffi a nice plot of land, and then told the bastard he couldn't put up his tent. He knows how to make them back down.
Third problem; a contentious congress. Here too Donald has job skills that help. He has bargined with Unions from day one. If Congress is tough to deal with, try NYC unions.
Then there is this. Donald has an inate ability to judge character and hire people from the start that can get the job done. We have advise and concent in America, so his choices for critical positions will be vetted like crazy, but his choices are likely not to be political pay offs but rather choices of people that can get it done. He is not a man that accepts fools or failure from those he hires.
I was struck by a comment in this blog. That Donald is "too honest" to be President. Hummmm. Perhaps what the American voter is hungry for is honesty. We have been lied to all too often by professional politicans.
So, if he runs what then? I don't know. The down side to Donald is his own self promotion, his family troubles, his past. The upside to Donald, he just might have the skills necessary for the job. We are seeing what happens when we ellect a dishonest politician with few if any skills to the position of president. Perhaps we might think a little bit about electing a "smooth operator" who has proven over and over again that he does. In any event, if he runs, it's going to be interesting for us all.
Abigail Adams| 3.24.11 @ 11:18PM
The down side of Donald is that he is not a Conservative; merely having some conservative views does not make him a Conservative. He is involved w/ Chicago politics, he donates to Chicago politics, and he's involved w/ Rahm Emanuel and his brother Ari. He "explains" his Chicago political donations, but explanation is merely an excuse. If doing business in Chicago necessitates donating to Chicago politics, then do business elsewhere.
tonypal| 3.24.11 @ 12:43PM
He probably has no shot at the nomination, but I love that he's out there saying what few others have the guts to say. I'm not really into this birth certificate stuff, as I see it as a distraction that may ultimately hurt any republican nominee. But I'm all for Trump whaling away, so let's encourage the guy to do the dirty work that we all wish others would undertake.
Big Java| 3.24.11 @ 12:53PM
Just remember how good Schwarzenegger was for Kalefoneah...
Casey Abell| 3.24.11 @ 1:26PM
Trump does know one thing: there's no GOP frontrunner. His faux candidacy is a good way to remind everybody else of this fundamental political fact.
I can actually see Trump getting a respectable finish in flinty (or granite-y) New Hampshire. Iowa is hopeless unless Donald gets born again in a hurry. He won't be the nominee, but he could provide some entertainment.
LiveFreeOrDie| 3.24.11 @ 1:27PM
People are growing weary of the career, elitist politician from either party. This is why (I believe) the left was so quick to attack and continue to attack Sarah Palin on any and all fronts. It's because she seemed to like a "real" person that regular people can relate to. Does Trump have a shot? Probably not but most people were surprised by the support he's had so far so who knows. Crazier things have happened and ridiculous people have been elected before. Obama for example.
Reid| 3.24.11 @ 8:35PM
Trump twisted the results of the polls and surveys he referred to on The View. Those polled rated Egypt and labor unions more favorable than Trump. Read more at: www.apleblog.com
http://apleblog.com/2011/03/24.....nd-faults-–-trump-at-his-best/
Abigail Adams| 3.24.11 @ 10:10PM
There are some things that I like, even admire about Donald Trump; he does have wisdom in some areas. However, I would never vote for him for my President because of his ties w/ both of the Emanual brothers. I cannot vote for any person who donates money to Rahm Emanuel; Mr. Trump also donated to Chicago politics because he "has projects there and politics is politics;" Ari Emanuel, brother of Rahm Emanuel, is Mr. Trump's television manager. No, I will not support any person who associates in any way with the Emanuel brothers who gave us Obamacare. Absolutely not.
Leslie Davis | 3.24.11 @ 10:37PM
Jesse Ventura
LIAR – BRIBER – PHONY NAVY SEAL
truTV – Conspiracy Theories
Starring America’s biggest liar and conspirator
Jesse “James Janos” Ventura
(even his name is fake)
”Always Cheat – The Philosophy of Jesse Ventura”
by Leslie Davis, Author and Activist
Call or write for a complimentary book - 612/529-5253
Most of the truTV conspiracy information is nothing new.
We reported the World Trade Center Building 7 demolition
for the insurance money on our TV show more than a year ago.
Call for our free WTC 7 video – 612/529-5253
Ventura intros his truTV show by lying about being a Navy SEAL.
He wasn’t a SEAL and the photo of him on truTV is from the movie Predator.
Facts you should know about Jesse Ventura
- Ventura lied about being a Navy SEAL on active duty. He joined the SEAL Reserves after active duty. (Page 102).
- He lied about being in Vietnam. He told Dennis Anderson of the Minneapolis Star Tribune that “you haven’t hunted until you’ve hunted man”. Ventura was never in combat and he never hunted man.
- Bribed a candidate on July 17, 1998 so he could run unopposed in the Reform Party and keep his radio show. Call for free video of the actual bribe.
- Bribed Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner to fix the 1998 bribe by giving a job to her boyfriend, John Wodele, as his Communications Director.
- Told single moms that they were on their own if they tried to get help.
- Told University of Minnesota students to “win if you can, lose if you must, but Always Cheat”.
- Insulted people who were religious or mentally ill.
- Killed caged birds at a game farm with Maria Shriver and Charlie Weaver.
- Endorsed “torture” of people at Highway 55 when 600-law enforcement (the largest police action in Minnesota history) arrested peaceful protesters trying to prevent demolition of homes for a road. Many protesters were handcuffed behind their backs and pepper sprayed in their eyes. (Page 4).
- Ventura took government money to go to school in Hennepin County and later told students that if they were smart enough to go to college they should be able to figure out how to pay for it.
CALL FOR A COMPLIMENTARY COPY OF “ALWAYS CHEAT”
----------------
Carlton West| 3.25.11 @ 5:34AM
If Sarah Palin is not the Republican Presidential nominee, her followers will not vote for anybody. Ergo, Obama gets an easy 2nd term.