Dave Weigel reports that even though the
Republican House requires all bills to identify their
constitutional justification, members still feel they can legislate
on whatever they want.
The Constitutional Authority Statements filed so far in the
112th Congress tend to support that view. They’re a fascinating
exercise. More than 1,200 pieces of legislation have been
introduced so far in this Congress, slightly more coming from
Republicans than from Democrats, and all of them are accompanied by
statements. The main lesson is the same that a lot of legal cynics
predicted last year: Almost anything can be justified by citing the
Commerce Clause, which allows Congress “to regulate Commerce with
foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian
Tribes” or the Necessary and Proper Clause, which allows Congress
to “make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying
into Execution the foregoing Powers.”
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) gives Weigel a smart quote that cuts to the
essence of this: “Just the mere fact that they start these
discussions, that’s helpful. The extent to which they turn out to
be helpful will turn on how much actual analysis takes place,
because there are ways of taking the Commerce Clause and making it
apply to everything. That’s not new. If that’s all that happens,
then this isn’t going to do much.”
As is the case with the Obamacare lawsuits, it is crucial to
reintroduce the doctrine of enumerated powers into the mainstream
political debate. Otherwise, this is all symbolism.
Rogue Elephant| 3.24.11 @ 11:29AM
Plus, they can always cite the "good and plenty clause" of the Constitution (a la Maxine Waters).
George S| 3.24.11 @ 2:33PM
... or the Santa Clause, which gives Congress the never ending presents of power.
carol| 3.24.11 @ 3:18PM
Maxine waters is a crime all by herself
actually very improtant but no buyers
Kevin R. C. Gutzman | 3.25.11 @ 12:01AM
As Lew Rockwell once said, being right is overrated.
Conservative View| 3.25.11 @ 9:19AM
Perhaps the time has come to eliminate the commerce clause altogether. We don't need it any more. States that impose taxes on incomming commerce are likely to find their products taxed as well, which doesn't work out well for anyone.
We might think of adding a tag line to the necessary and proper clause as well. Only necessary and proper to pass a bill then in concideration, not laws already passed. If you want to add something to an existing bill, then what you add must pass Constitional muster on its' own.
None of this can happen until the several states realize that the robber baron in America today is Congress itself. It is Congress as much as anything passing along costs to the States that is bankrupting the States. Unless we have a Constitutional Convention called for by the States to reign in the power of the Federal Government the States, and then the country, will go belly up.