Just because the lead option for skinning that cat cap-n-trade
is defeated (for now) and climate science is in retreat, doesn’t
mean lots of money hasn’t been thrown at rehabilitating it (it has)
and that alarmism and all that comes with it won’t make a run
at a comeback (it will…nothing with the returns being banked
on by the global warming industry will ever go away gracefully
simply because of little things like being discredited and
economically ruinous).
So, see the future, if the R candidate in the upcoming 2012
opportunity to draw contrasts decides it’s better to sidestep the
issue rather than risk (gasp) controversy. It’s
on full display Down Under (no, this isn’t aimed
only
at you, Mitt).
Russell Seitz | 3.23.11 @ 1:42AM
Stone me a crow , mate ! Chris & Co. will be in deep trouble if the down under climate journalism standard becomes a s popular in these parts as the
Australian balloT:
What would become of his cohort if , to quote the site he's linked to :
"Under the Australian Communications and Media Authority's (ACMA) code of practice, broadcasters are required to make reasonable efforts to ensure that current affairs material, presented as factual, is reasonably supportable and to correct errors of fact at the earliest opportunity."