May 9, 2013 | 6 comments
January 10, 2013 | 8 comments
October 3, 2012 | 17 comments
May 9, 2012 | 13 comments
May 9, 2012 | 2 comments
President Obama’s not the only one who believes that “words matter.” So, too, does Libyan dictator Muammar al-Gaddafi. That’s why he’s blithely ignored his own ceasefire and, in clear defiance of President Obama and the “international community” continued his assault on the rebel forces trapped in Benghazi.
Finally and belatedly, it seems, French jets are en route to Libya to begin enforcement of the United Nations resolution which authorizes “all necessary measures…to protect civilians and civilian populated areas, including Benghazi, while excluding an occupation force.”
I sincerely hope that French and British military action will be sufficient to stop Gaddafi and his mercenary army. I am, however, dubious.
Air power alone, after all cannot win wars. You need boots on the ground to root out the enemy and occupy terrain. Yet Obama has ruled out the use of American ground troops in Libya.
The U.N. resolution, meanwhile, explicitly excludes “an occupying force” and, in any case, does not explicitly call for Gaddafi’s removal from power.
This was a tactical blunder that, in the past 24 hours, has had decisive strategic consequences. Unfortunately for the Libyan people and the United States, the decisive strategic consequences have all been in Gaddafi’s favor. He seems to have concluded, and rightly so, that the United States and the United Nations are not committed to winning in Libya.
Instead, we are committed, it seems, to humanitarian half measures that will allow Gaddafi to stay in power, while, over time, he harasses and destroys the rebel forces.
Thus Gaddafi has ignored his own ceasefire, his forces have continued to advance toward Benghazi, and it is only a matter of time before he has snuffed out any and all opposition.
Will British and French air power be enough to save the Libyan rebels at this late hour? Will aerial bombardments cause Gaddafi to relinquish power? Military history suggests otherwise.
Still, if there were ever a place where air power alone could win a war, it might well be Libya, which is comprised mostly of flat desert terrain. The enemy, consequently, has nowhere to hide.
Gaddafi’s African mercenaries, moreover, are not exactly well-trained or elite troops. In fact, quite the opposite.
Nonetheless, Gaddafi seems to have concluded that in the absence of American and allied soldiers and marines, he could continue his advance toward Benghazi with impunity.
And that’s the problem. Obama’s threatening words mean very little to Gaddafi because he already knows with certainty that the Commander-in-Chief of the American Armed Forces absolutely will not send U.S. ground troops to Libya.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online