The New York Times asked for “about 300 words” on the
Rand Paul kerfuffle over state nannies meddling with toilets, light
bulbs et al.
I hit the word count with what I provided, below, which has now
run if in somewhat altered form as
this:
Flush with indignation, Sen. Rand Paul growled at an ‘energy
efficiency’ bureaucrat over what her ilk had done to the perfectly
functioning toilet, imploring her to pull the plug on such
nannying. He equally glowed about her newfangled, expensive,
underperforming light bulbs.
What’s his problem? Why can’t he and others more be like
Europeans, so much better — we’re told — at accepting
‘encouragement’ from the state? Actually, Europeans resisted.
Prompting the
Times’ own contemporaneous headline, “Europe’s Ban on
Old-Style Bulbs Begins”. This
left shoppers “angry and confused”. Sounds familiar.
The legislative rebellion of Paul, et al., is also oh so
European. “President of European Parliament Industry Committee
calls for ‘immediate end’ to EU’s ban on light bulbs”, blared a
December summary
of German media coverage.
‘Why’, so elusive to some, is also why the ‘encouragement’
is no such thing, but state-imposed mandates and bans: given the
freedom of choice, your rejection of what the nannies insist you
buy or use is a rational one.
Consider, about the preferred bulbs, how
Die Presse and the
Mail report lawmakers decrying the mercury hazard that in
any other circumstance our ‘green’ overlords would never tolerate.
German consumer magazine Ökotest
reports “Only a third of the sixteen bulbs tested produced a
satisfactory level of light and one Swiss model produced almost no
light at all. Four of the models were described as flops,
because they failed all of the tests and only one model scored an
overall mark of good.”
For the pleasure, the
Mail on Sunday writes, they “cost up to four times as much
as a standard one”.
Next up? Politically correct and equally inept energy
generation, now
threatening Germany with blackouts, about which one lawmaker
says “this shouldn’t surprise anybody given the irrational energy
policies of excessive reliance on renewables.”