The New York Times asked for "about 300 words" on the
Rand Paul kerfuffle over state nannies meddling with toilets, light
bulbs et al.
I hit the word count with what I provided, below, which has now
run if in somewhat altered form as
this:
Flush with indignation, Sen. Rand Paul growled at an 'energy
efficiency' bureaucrat over what her ilk had done to the perfectly
functioning toilet, imploring her to pull the plug on such
nannying. He equally glowed about her newfangled, expensive,
underperforming light bulbs.
What's his problem? Why can't he and others more be like
Europeans, so much better -- we're told -- at accepting
'encouragement' from the state? Actually, Europeans resisted.
Prompting the
Times' own contemporaneous headline, "Europe's Ban on
Old-Style Bulbs Begins". This
left shoppers "angry and confused". Sounds familiar.
The legislative rebellion of Paul, et al., is also oh so
European. "President of European Parliament Industry Committee
calls for 'immediate end' to EU's ban on light bulbs", blared a
December summary
of German media coverage.
'Why', so elusive to some, is also why the 'encouragement'
is no such thing, but state-imposed mandates and bans: given the
freedom of choice, your rejection of what the nannies insist you
buy or use is a rational one.
Consider, about the preferred bulbs, how
Die Presse and the
Mail report lawmakers decrying the mercury hazard that in
any other circumstance our 'green' overlords would never tolerate.
German consumer magazine Ökotest
reports "Only a third of the sixteen bulbs tested produced a
satisfactory level of light and one Swiss model produced almost no
light at all. Four of the models were described as flops,
because they failed all of the tests and only one model scored an
overall mark of good."
For the pleasure, the
Mail on Sunday writes, they "cost up to four times as much
as a standard one".
Next up? Politically correct and equally inept energy
generation, now
threatening Germany with blackouts, about which one lawmaker
says "this shouldn't surprise anybody given the irrational energy
policies of excessive reliance on renewables."
I'm glad to see somone finally outing the hypocrites in the
green movement on the new light bulbs. You are exactly correct
about the mercury. If Edison had developed that bulb the greens
would have been furious. Can't wait for the first lawsuit of a
child injured by the mercury in those bulbs. Kind of reminds me of
the ads I now see on TV about how many children die each year in
Africa from Malaria. No kidding. Their only answer is more netting
when the science has proved that DDT was not the carcinogen they
said it was, unless you put it in your coffee instead of powedered
cream. Any apology from the greens for the millions of children
they have murdered with their lies about DDT? Haven't heard one.
Same with the mercury in the light bulb. Kids could drop like flies
but you'll never hear a peep from the greens.
Floyd Looney| 3.18.11 @ 1:44PM
Paying 4 times more for a lousy government approved product is just a leftist wet dream isn't it?
Clint| 3.18.11 @ 2:02PM
Uh Oh !
The War On Bulbs.
Bulb Runners, Bulb Sniffin' Dogs, The ATFB, Felony Bulb Convictions, Bulb Rehab Centers, Bulbers Anonymous......
Rich Fisher| 3.18.11 @ 2:53PM
I'm glad to see somone finally outing the hypocrites in the green movement on the new light bulbs. You are exactly correct about the mercury. If Edison had developed that bulb the greens would have been furious. Can't wait for the first lawsuit of a child injured by the mercury in those bulbs. Kind of reminds me of the ads I now see on TV about how many children die each year in Africa from Malaria. No kidding. Their only answer is more netting when the science has proved that DDT was not the carcinogen they said it was, unless you put it in your coffee instead of powedered cream. Any apology from the greens for the millions of children they have murdered with their lies about DDT? Haven't heard one. Same with the mercury in the light bulb. Kids could drop like flies but you'll never hear a peep from the greens.