Clinton said, "I think it's very important that this not be a
US-led effort, because this comes from the people of Libya
themselves." She went on to say, "We think it's important the
United Nations makes this decision, not the United States and so
far the United Nations has not done that."
And therein lies the problem. If the first Bush Administration
had waited back in 1992 for the UN to make a decision then there
would have been any no-fly zones in Iraq. The no-fly zones, of
course, were organized and administered by the United States,
Britain and France (until it withdrew in 1998).
Iron Bottom is right. We must wait for that bulwark of
Democracy, The U.N. to lead us. Those brave U.N. leaders, those
impeccable gentleman who stand firm in the face of danger and
despotism, like the president of the U.N. Human Rights Commission,
Najat Al-Hajjaji, from Libya. And those troops! Those brave, blue
helmeted supermen who have take the lead in places such as Iraq,
Darfur and Rwanda! We are nop match for this wonderful
organization! Hillary! Our savior . . well, next to Obama, who is a
Christ-like figure spreading love across the globe with his
apologies for America's meanness.
Wayne | 3.9.11 @ 11:44AM
Its just a delay tactic. This administration is waiting for
Qaddhafi to beat the rebels, then it will come in with aid like it
did in Haiti. Qaddhafi is Obama's friend and ally.
Stan Redmond| 3.9.11 @ 11:53AM
My associates don't believe me when I make this claim. Obama
will NEVER launch a new military action during his term. Not now
not ever regardless of what happens. DC could be a glass parking
lot from an Iranian nuke and he would not act.
Ricco| 3.9.11 @ 12:24PM
How many dead civilians, including women and children, are an
acceptable number before the US acts? What is our moral compass for
this?
Occam's Tool| 3.9.11 @ 12:57PM
If we fuse to glass at very high temperatures all sand on
military airbases in Libya and Iran, that would be useful---and it
could reverse Global warming!
PattyMor| 3.9.11 @ 1:55PM
No more wars, especially in Muslim countries. Let them take care
of themselves. Its none of our business. And, we can't afford
it.
Just curious, but how many airplane does the UN
Have??
Eric Cartman| 3.9.11 @ 11:13AM
Iron Bottom is right. We must wait for that bulwark of Democracy, The U.N. to lead us. Those brave U.N. leaders, those impeccable gentleman who stand firm in the face of danger and despotism, like the president of the U.N. Human Rights Commission, Najat Al-Hajjaji, from Libya. And those troops! Those brave, blue helmeted supermen who have take the lead in places such as Iraq, Darfur and Rwanda! We are nop match for this wonderful organization! Hillary! Our savior . . well, next to Obama, who is a Christ-like figure spreading love across the globe with his apologies for America's meanness.
Wayne | 3.9.11 @ 11:44AM
Its just a delay tactic. This administration is waiting for Qaddhafi to beat the rebels, then it will come in with aid like it did in Haiti. Qaddhafi is Obama's friend and ally.
Stan Redmond| 3.9.11 @ 11:53AM
My associates don't believe me when I make this claim. Obama will NEVER launch a new military action during his term. Not now not ever regardless of what happens. DC could be a glass parking lot from an Iranian nuke and he would not act.
Ricco| 3.9.11 @ 12:24PM
How many dead civilians, including women and children, are an acceptable number before the US acts? What is our moral compass for this?
Occam's Tool| 3.9.11 @ 12:57PM
If we fuse to glass at very high temperatures all sand on military airbases in Libya and Iran, that would be useful---and it could reverse Global warming!
PattyMor| 3.9.11 @ 1:55PM
No more wars, especially in Muslim countries. Let them take care of themselves. Its none of our business. And, we can't afford it.
Just curious, but how many airplane does the UN
Have??