About
those utilities, like Exelon, AEP, NextEra, which are ‘folding’
on something they actually had been pushing — the GHG
rationing/’clean energy economy’ agenda (see here, here, here,
here for examples) — it’s time to capture what they’re up to
in a phrase.
“Tax collectors for the welfare state” gets half of it, and may
suffice despite omitting the part about their taste, wetting their
beaks in return for the effort.
You see, unlike the world you live in which must be innovative
to succeed, they generally make money not by getting you
to buy more of their stuff. They make money under a cost-plus
model, sometimes now called ‘decoupling’. If you are say PG&E
in California, pushing the global warming agenda hard, you stand to
benefit at the ratepayer’s and economy’s expense because your
guaranteed rate of return, 11.35%, says you’ll never get reaalllly
rich. But since you make more the more the state makes you spend on
capital expenses, you figure out you can do a lot better getting
111.35% of a few billion than you would 111.35% of a few hundred
million.
Don’t cost nuthin’. The poor saps who weren’t at the table pick
it up. If you’re a utility, as AEP CEO Mike Morris has admitted,
the beauty of the system is you get it all back with a little
sumpn’ for helping out. You actually make out on the deal, while
the public — presuming you are there fighting expensive policies,
not thinking that you’ve arranged a scheme to benefit from
expensive policies, thinking ‘well, if these guys say it’s ok,
well…’
So you lobby to get the state to make you buy all sorts of
expensive stuff.
Here we see the moral hazard of having these people serve,
effectively, as the policymaking gatekeeper to protect the public
from kleptocrats, presumed to be there fighting essentially on your
behalf by opposing expensive policies, but in fact pushing them
because they operate on a cost-plus model.
This Congress needs to ensure the voters are represented
somehow. It is too simplistic and ignorant of reality to pretend
that the elected Members serve that role. They’re the policymakers,
‘representing all’, but dealing with the people with the
deep-pocketed voice.
We killed the ‘inevitable’ cap-n-trade. Now it’s time to clean
up this mess.
uncle curmudgeon| 3.2.11 @ 12:29PM
Right you are, Chris. This is the same model we saw with the sub-prime fiasco. The gubmint tells industry to do that which can only fail; or else we'll call you a dirty name (with sub-prime the name was racist). Industry's "titans" cringe and promise to do as they are told. As soon as the big meanies go away industry repairs to the Boardroom where the method for incentivizing stupidity is hammered out. (almost) Everybody wins; and there's still time to get any early afternoon tee-time. We have a lot of work ahead of us, my friend.
Rogue Elephant| 3.2.11 @ 2:35PM
That's one of the problems with state-chartered monopolies and cartels, isn't it? They use the power of the state to extort monopoly rents from consumers.