House budget chief Paul Ryan restated that the Republican Party
intends to produce a budget that “shows real leadership on
entitlement reform” this morning at a press breakfast hosted by
The American Spectator and Americans for Tax Reform.
Criticizing President Obama as “deeply unserious” about fiscal
reform, Ryan characterized the difference between Republicans’ and
Democrats’ ideas of fiscal policy as a difference in vision about
the role of the government, with the Democrats pursuing a version
of European-style social democracy.
Ryan warned that, fiscally, the U.S. is headed “off a cliff,”
and suggested that there was “not a lot of time” before the bond
markets begin to assert a limit to the debt that the government can
issue. Although Ryan stated that all government spending, including
the defense budget, needs to be reduced, he argued in great detail
that health care spending is the key threat to the government’s
solvency.
“Unless you can convincingly tackle the the root cause of health
inflation you’re not going to get this turned around,” Ryan said.
He argued for a more free-market system of health care, saying that
he wants “300 million consumers” of health care services. “When you
have consumer pressure, when you have transpency on price and
quality, and a consumer incentive to act on those things,
— voilà: better quality, lower prices.” Ryan
identified a lack of consumer-based spending as the fatal flaw of
Obamacare, and
criticized Romneycare for the same reason.
Ryan got deep into the policy weeds in defending the
Republicans’ attempts to cut spending immediately. He criticized
recent studies by Goldman Sachs economists and Mark Zandi of
Moody’s Analytics that claimed that Republicans’ budget cuts would
lead to sizable job losses, saying that the reports contained
“bogus mulitipliers” for government spending. He specifically cited
the work of economists John Taylor of Stanford and Robert Barro of
Harvard in making the case for budget cuts.
CalMark| 3.2.11 @ 11:35AM
Question.
The country had a $440 billion deficit in Bush's last year.
It went up by $1 trillion--that's TRillion, with a TR--the next fiscal year.
Where the HELL is all this money going, and why can't it all just be cut?
tonypal| 3.2.11 @ 1:59PM
What don't you morons understand? In order to reduce a deficit, you first need to make it grow to an unsustainable level. Isn't that economics 101? The thinking by TAS readers on deficits is just as stupid when it comes to tax policy, treasury revenues and job growth. Apart from the flat earth dopes here, everyone knows that by increasing taxes, you encourage hiring and spending. Anyone with a brain knows by increasing tax rates, more money comes into the treasury because people are paying hiring taxes. Duh!
tonypal| 3.2.11 @ 2:11PM
Ok, apparently I've made a miraculous recovery from the massive head injury I suffered. I think I was channeling one of the mindless trolls assigned by Media Matters to infiltrate this site.
Paul Ryan is clearly the smartest guy in DC. I've never come across a guy with such an encyclopedic knowledge of the budget. It's almost scary how much this guy knows. Ryan presents such a clear contrast to Obama, an utter fool who probably couldn't balance his checkbook.
God jharp is such a shitty sperm donor.