My cover
story for the March print edition on the California high-speed
rail boondoggle is now available on the main site. This project is
worth keeping an eye on, because it has already claimed $3.2
billion from the Obama administration and hopes to get at least $18
billion from federal taxpayers in the years to come. In the more
immediate term, California is
angling for some of the high-speed rail stimulus funds that
Florida Gov. Rick Scott rejected. In a broader sense, the
California high-speed rail effort is a case study in what happens
when liberal fantasy confronts reality.
Some highlights from the story:
— The initial $5.5 billion portion of the project, now in
the works, won’t result in any actual high-speed trains running,
and would merely lay tracks in a relatively low population part of
the state.
— A week before the 2010 midterm elections, the Obama
administration awarded $715 million in additional federal
money to the project under the condition that the first segment
would be built in the less inhabited Central Valley – coincidently,
where two Democratic members of Congress were facing tough
reelection battles.
— A number of independent analysts have questioned the
cost projections and business model for the high-speed rail project
– and a University of California at Berkeley study concluded the
ridership estimates being used to sell the plan were
unreliable.
— The project has encountered a lot of community opposition as
it has progressed. Several wealthy cities (Palo Alto, Atherton, and
Menlo Park) are suing to prevent the trains from tearing through
their downtowns. Farmers are worried that the tracks will carve up
their land. Some environmental groups normally predisposed to
supporting high-speed rail have turned against the proposed route,
fearing its effects on undeveloped areas.
— One state legislator in California is lobbying the U.S.
Congress to stop sending his own state any more money for
high-speed rail. “When they send us money, it actually costs us
money,” he told me. A local mayor echoed the sentiment, and heaped
praise on Govs. Scott Walker and John Kasich for turning down
high-speed rail money in Wisconsin and Ohio.
— A high-speed rail authority official acknowledged
to me that they won’t be able to attract private financing for the
project unless they have a steady flow of money from Washington,
and thus they plan on continuing to “compete aggressively
for federal funding.”
— If House Republicans manage cut off high-speed rail
funding, they could deal the project a fatal blow.
Lots more in the full piece. As they say, read the whole
thing here.