The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Since the announcement of the planned merger between Progress Energy and Duke Energy, which would make the latter the largest electric utility in the country, Progress CEO Bill Johnson has made several public appearances to explain the details. In remarks he gave to regulators who met in Washington on Monday, Johnson warned of a coming “train wreck” or “tsunami” that government excess is going to bring about:

“It’s not hard to imagine the customer pushback that will occur because of the resulting increase in the price of electricity. This pushback will come from industrial customers struggling to be competitive, and from residential customers and small businesses struggling to make ends meet. As indicated, I’m especially sensitive to the households of modest means, where energy represents a disproportionately large share of disposable income.”

Ironically this sentiment runs counter to the statements and actions of the person who will be Johnson’s new boss, Duke CEO Jim Rogers, who has pushed increased regulations like cap-and-trade as part of the U.S. Climate Action Partnership. I explain more in a blog post today at the National Legal and Policy Center.

topics:
Global Warming, Electric Energy, Regulation, Climate Change

View all comments (4) |

PattyMor| 2.16.11 @ 2:23PM

We already see America's future. High heating and electricity bills. Shortages of power and water due to contrived shortages and the shut down of coal fired back up plants. Businesses will get fed up and leave. We will left holding the proverbial bags (ie. higher prices).

hmm_contrib| 2.16.11 @ 3:04PM

But what are the regulations he's speaking about? What do they regulate? How do they cost money? Why are they avoidable? Paul labels them simply as "government excess" but doesn't explain what they are or why they're bad. I understand it's very "in" right now to lambast the government for doing, well, anything, but this kind of "conclusion as thesis statement" doesn't actually argue anything: it simply assumes that its audience will agree regardless of the details and thus gets to avoid having to provide any. The linked blog post is equally devoid of details.

danny| 2.16.11 @ 8:09PM

hmm_contrib, are you actually that stupid, or are you putting us on?

Flee| 2.16.11 @ 3:47PM

Yeah these guys need to get their act together. It is difficult to support climate control legislation and yet support holding the line on consumer energy costs. Subsidizing poor individuals to buy energy is more wealth redistribution from above. The two heads of this energy giant should be working from the same playbook or all hell could break loose during an extended heat wave or cold snap. I know my bills are slowly increasing despite reduced usage. Of course in California anything is possible.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Paul Chesser

http://spectator.org/blog/2011/02/16/the-coming-man-made-regulation

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

From the Obama Ministry of Truth

Ben Stein | 5.21.13

IRS Union Chief Stonewalls

Jeffrey Lord | 5.21.13

Wimps Versus Barbarians

Thomas Sowell | 5.21.13

Damage Control for Dummies

Matt Purple | 5.22.13

Anyone Still Believe Me?

Aaron Goldstein | 5.21.13

ADVERTISEMENT