Consider what I wrote a couple of weeks ago in my
article "Why Israel Worries About a Post-Mubarak Egypt?":
Of course, there are the likes of
Stephen Walt, the noted anti-Israel academic, who naturally
downplays the adverse consequences of a sudden change of government
in Egypt for Israel:
For starters, a post-Mubarak government is unlikely to tear
up the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty, because such a move would put
it immediately at odds with the United States and Europe and bring
Cairo few tangible benefits. Although ordinary Egyptians do feel
strong sympathy for the Palestinians, the primary concern of those
now marching in the streets is domestic affairs, not foreign
policy.
I am not sure what makes Walt think a post-Mubarak Egypt,
especially one where the Muslim Brotherhood plays a role, will give
a damn about what the Obama Administration or the EU might think of
its actions any more than Iran does. Besides, what happens if a new
regime in Egypt, whether led by ElBaradei or someone else, cannot
redress the primary concerns of those now marching in the streets
any better than Mubarak? By Walt's own admission, ordinary
Egyptians do feel strong sympathy for the Palestinians. Should a
new Egyptian government be unable to address the domestic concerns
of it populace, what card is it likely to play? Well, Muhammad
Ghannem, a leading spokesperson for the Muslim
Brotherhood in the U.K., says
the people of Egypt "should be prepared for war against
Israel."
Well, the post-Mubarak Egypt has begun and it doesn't even look
like Nour is going to even try to solve its economic woes. Keep in
mind that Nour is probably the closest thing Egypt has to a Western
liberal. But if Nour thinks that talk about tearing up Camp
David as the surest path to Egypt's presidency then heaven help us
all.
Ken (Old Texican)| 2.16.11 @ 10:24AM
No, Aaron.
Heaven help the Egyptian Muslims.
Too Many Tims| 2.16.11 @ 10:47AM
A hard rain is gonna fall.
Occam's Tool| 2.16.11 @ 11:01AM
Fused Glass Happens, Especially To Dams.