The budget that
President Obama proposed on Monday is highly dependent on economic
growth forecasts for the next decade that are significantly higher
than the Congressional Budget Office has projected. Economic
assumptions can affect budget numbers in several ways. For
instance, if the government collects more money in a better economy
provided tax rates remain constant, which shrinks deficits. At the
same time, deficits appear lower as a percentage of the economy,
because the economy is larger.
I put together this quick table comparing the economic growth
assumptions for the White House as compared to the CBO, and as you
can see, the administration’s assumptions are higher in every year
but 2015, when they’re the same. In testimony before the House
Budget Committee yesterday, White House Budget director Jacob Lew
argued that the higher forecasts were based on historical data from
past financially-based recessions.

While these don’t look significantly different at first blush,
they can make a huge difference when compounded over 10 years in an
economy as large as ours. To demonstrate this, I did a back of the
envelope estimate by plugging in the CBO’s GDP assumptions to the
White House budget numbers (i.e. assuming revenue as a percentage
of GDP is the same as the Obama administration predicts). This
resulted in deficits that were $1.11 trillion higher than what the
administration is projecting — in other words, it wipes out the
entire deficit savings the administration is
claiming its budget produces. If you just take 2021 as an
example, merely swapping in the CBO’s GDP assumptions moves that
year’s deficit from $774 billion and 3.1 percent of GDP to $935
billion, and 3.9 percent of GDP.
I should note by way of caution that there are a lot of moving
parts in a budget and these should not be considered firm numbers.
(For instance, a better economy means fewer people using government
services, so it can affect spending on some programs such as
unemployment benefits.) Before too long, wel’ll have a full CBO
analysis of President Obama’s budget. But I thought it was worth
emphasizing how much of a difference alternate economic assumptions
can make in budgeting.
Rick| 2.16.11 @ 6:55PM
Your a rasist!
Lullabys, Legends and Lies| 2.16.11 @ 9:16PM
Rick says: Your a rasist (sic)!
No Rick: Your a ideeot (sic)!
Your a Publec Skool dropout (more likely thrown out-sic)!!
Oh yeah, and Rick?, your joke isn't funny anymore, and "you're" a Douchebag!!