Earlier this week, I explained why I thought we
shouldn't write off Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour's chances of
winning the Republican nomination, despite the obvious obstacles to
his potential candidacy. This morning, Barbour reinforced that view
with an impressive speech at CPAC.
Barbour demonstrated why he could be a a strong contender in a
wide open Republican field. He showed a command of policy and could
relate that to actual governing experience. For instance, a lot of
speakers talked about the need to address entitlement spending in
the abstract, but here was Barbour:
Our liberal media elite especially criticized my savings in
Medicaid; those savings have been large - hundreds of millions.
One way was to make sure everyone receiving Medicaid was
actually eligible. Under my Democrat predecessor, our Medicaid
rolls shot up from about 500,000 to about 750,000 in four years. A
key reform we made was to require recipients who aren't in nursing
homes or immobile because of their health to re-establish their
Medicaid eligibility in person annually. After my reforms, the
rolls fell from nearly 750,000 to fewer than 600,000, by more than
20%.
Another change was to emphasize strong management so our
Medicaid error rate now is the fourth lowest in the country; less
than half of the national average, and about half the federal
Medicare error rate. Our state taxpayers save about $50 million a
year just because of our lower error rate. That would equal tens of
billions in savings for the federal government in Medicaid and
Medicare if the national error rate was the same as that of
Mississippi's Medicaid program.
Governors deal with problems, and voters have decided, from here
on out, leaders should be judged not by their hopes or intentions;
leaders must be judged by the results they achieve.
In an indication that he's likely running, Barbour defended his
record on pro-life issues. Last year, he came under some criticism
for comments that echoed his friend Mitch Daniels social issues
"truce" remarks, and Rick Santorum
lumped the two together earlier this week. Barbour said:
A lot of people think while Republican Governors were attacking
fiscal issues we were ignoring social issues. That's not right.
My first year as Governor my pro-life agenda was adopted by our
Democrat- majority legislature, and Americans United for Life named
Mississippi the safest state in America for an unborn child.
And remember that Barbour not only has a governing record, but
he's one of the most well-connected Republicans in the country, if
not the single most well-connected. A lot of people have been
saying that Mitt Romney may be the early frontrunner given
Republicans' tendency to nominate the one seen as "next in line."
But given Barbour's vast network and the number of elected
Republicans that are indebted to him for what he's done for the
party over the decades, could Barbour actually be the beneficiary
of that phenomenon this time around?
Full text of his speech below for those who missed it.
FINAL DRAFT
GOVERNOR HALEY BARBOUR
CPAC 2011
Thank you David - I appreciate our long friendship all the way
back to the '76 Reagan days. And thank you for the warm
welcome.
Speaking of warm, man, this global warming is freezing me to
death!!
Over the years this conference has usually focused on what's
wrong with the Left. To deal with that subject now would take a
month, not just a weekend.
The policies of the left are why, since the last time I spoke at
CPAC, our political fortunes have changed dramatically.
Seven new Republican Senators ...
Twenty-nine Republican governors, including nine out of 10 key
swing states for 2012 ...
More than six hundred new Republican legislators.
And the largest Republican majority in the U.S. House of
Representatives in 65 years.
You know what we call that in Mississippi? A pretty good
start.
The 2010 election was the greatest repudiation of the policies
of a President and a Party in American history.
November 2nd was the crescendo of a stunning rejection of a
leftist governing philosophy that is profoundly at odds with
America's founding principles and our history of democratic
self-government and entrepreneurial capitalism.
For two years, the Obama Administration and the Democrat
Congress pursued an agenda bent on fulfilling the pent-up demands
of every frustrated liberal - at the expense of the public good and
contrary to the will of the people.
When America needed a growth strategy to revive our
recession-wracked economy, the Obama Administration and the
Pelosi-Reid Congress gave us a $1 trillion stimulus bill that only
stimulated more government.
As unemployment soared to 10 percent, Americans needed and
called for policies that would spur job creation. Instead of
focusing on jobs, the Obama Administration and its Democrat
Congress spent more than a year concocting a government-run health
care system - one that stifles job creation as well as drives up
the cost of health care.
At a time when we desperately needed incentives to create new
jobs, President Obama and his congressional allies tried to impose
the biggest tax increase in American history on small business
owners by letting the Bush tax cuts expire. Two years of their
calling for these massive tax increases caused more uncertainty
among employers, making them reluctant to hire new workers or spend
any money until they could see how high their tax burden would
be.
Along the way, the President and his Democrat Congress pushed
government spending to 25 percent of GDP, sucking trillions of
dollars out of the productive, private economy.
They forget that every dollar taxed or borrowed by government is
a dollar that can't be invested by an entrepreneur or small
business person in a job-creating product or facility ... a dollar
that can't be saved by a family hoping to send their children to
college. In the liberal ideology, every dollar earned belongs to
government. They believe reducing taxes is some kind of government
give-away to the taxpayers.
Despite job creation's being the top priority for our country,
this Administration's policies have been more hostile to job
creation than any I've ever seen.
Now ... after his policies have contributed to unemployment
rates stuck at 9-plus percent for almost two years ... suddenly,
President Obama and Democrats are paying lip service to job
creation. Except this time, they're calling their spending spree
"investments" rather than "stimulus."
Happily, the new conservative majority in the House understands
that jobs are created by the private sector, not by government.
Indeed, a bigger government means a smaller economy.
Because of last year's election, we've already extended the Bush
tax cuts for another two years. And Republicans will cut spending
and take the first step toward restoring sanity to the federal
budget.
These are important accomplishments ... but they are only a
start.
We won an important victory in November, but we don't control
the government. Our House majority only gives us control of
one-half of one-third of our national government.
Our new majority can stop the worst excesses of exhausted
liberalism. We can stop funding for bad policies ... we can push
for less spending ... we can use the House's oversight authority to
expose the damage being done by the blizzard of Obama
Administration job-crushing regulations. But, we can't today do
what needs to be done for our country.
So, as we prepare today and for the next twenty-one months, I
ask you to remember the words of my fellow Mississippian, Fred
Smith, CEO of Fedex, who says: The main thing is to keep the main
thing the main thing.
The main thing is electing a Republican President next year.
*We cannot put America on the right track until we elect a
Republican President in 2012 and a Republican Senate to join the
Republican House in enacting those critical policies. We will not
have the policies that lead to economic growth, job creation,
smaller government, less spending, lower taxes, rational regulation
and a stronger presence in the world in every dimension until we
have a Republican President to lead for those right policies; the
ones that will achieve the right results.
Make no mistake: the reckless policies of the Obama
Administration and the left-wing Congress have brought America to a
crossroads.
The Congressional Budget Office informs us this year's deficit
will hit a staggering record of $1.5 trillion. For every $1 it
spends, the federal government will have to borrow 40 cents - much
of it from the Chinese government, and my generation's children and
grandchildren, that's many of you, will be handed the bill, a
gargantuan debt to pay.
In fact, CBO reports this year the federal government will spend
$3.7 trillion but only take in $2.2 trillion. We don't have a
revenue problem, we have a spending problem.
But the federal government can't spend itself rich, anymore than
your family can spend itself rich.
I remember how liberals used to mock my old boss Ronald Reagan's
belief that lower taxes would spur economic growth and improve the
nation's balance sheet. The left laughed and said we couldn't "grow
our way out of the deficit."
Let me tell you something: It's a heckuva lot easier to grow
your way out of a deficit than to spend your way out.
In my first four years as Governor we got rid of a huge budget
shortfall because revenue went up more than 40%, without raising
anybody's taxes. Revenue went up because we had more taxpayers with
more taxable income.
But, we have to be honest. This failure to control federal
spending took place under Republicans as well as Democrats, though
it's gotten a lot worse during the last two years.
It took about 220 years for our government to accumulate $5
trillion in debt. Under Obama our debt will grow by $5 trillion in
less than four years!
I pray and believe the Republicans in Congress, Republican
Legislatures and Republican Governors will be faithful to the will
of the American people, expressed in November.
And from my experience as Governor I know Congress can reduce
spending. I've watched Mitch Daniels give Indiana its first
balanced budget in eight years, without raising taxes; I saw
Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell come into office facing a deficit
in excess of $2 billion. He cancelled a big tax increase,
controlled spending and has a surplus of more than $400 million.
Chris Christie has shown responsible spending cuts can be achieved
even in an usually blue state like New Jersey.
A lot of people think while Republican Governors were attacking
fiscal issues we were ignoring social issues. That's not right.
My first year as Governor my pro-life agenda was adopted by our
Democrat- majority legislature, and Americans United for Life named
Mississippi the safest state in America for an unborn child.
As I mentioned, that year, Mississippi had a $720 million budget
shortfall, about 20% of our total general fund. It took us two
years, but we eliminated that deficit without raising anybody's
taxes.
More recently, when the recession hit our state, as allowed by
law, I cut spending by 9.4%, right at $500 million.
We governors cut spending, including some Democrat governors
like Phil Bredesen in Tennessee. Congress can cut spending,
too.
And there's plenty to cut.
When I cut state spending nearly 10% over the course of one
fiscal year, I said I didn't think most people even noticed. Of
course, the liberals and the advocates whined and moaned.
Our liberal media elite especially criticized my savings in
Medicaid; those savings have been large - hundreds of millions.
One way was to make sure everyone receiving Medicaid was
actually eligible. Under my Democrat predecessor, our Medicaid
rolls shot up from about 500,000 to about 750,000 in four years. A
key reform we made was to require recipients who aren't in nursing
homes or immobile because of their health to re-establish their
Medicaid eligibility in person annually. After my reforms, the
rolls fell from nearly 750,000 to fewer than 600,000, by more than
20%.
Another change was to emphasize strong management so our Medicaid
error rate now is the fourth lowest in the country; less than half
of the national average, and about half the federal Medicare error
rate. Our state taxpayers save about $50 million a year just
because of our lower error rate. That would equal tens of billions
in savings for the federal government in Medicaid and Medicare if
the national error rate was the same as that of Mississippi's
Medicaid program.
Governors deal with problems, and voters have decided, from here
on out, leaders should be judged not by their hopes or intentions;
leaders must be judged by the results they achieve.
This fact is why President Obama has tried to sound like Ronald
Reagan for the last several weeks. Reagan would recognize this ploy
as just another play from the Democrat playbook: Fake up the
middle, then run around left end.
Spending becomes investments; non-defense discretionary spending
should be capped, but at a level of 27% higher than two years ago;
the most job-stifling regulatory regime in history - that of Barack
Obama and Carol Browner - will be "reviewed". The President even
told Bill O'Reilly Sunday that taxes hadn't gone up during his
first two years: What he didn't say was the lack of a huge tax
increase was solely because he couldn't get any Republican Senators
to vote for his proposal for the largest tax increase in history.
And he told us in his State of the Union address that he would push
for that gigantic tax increase in this Congress. The Gipper would
have chuckled and shook his head, having seen the Left trot out
this old movie many times before.
Americans have told us they want a more responsible government -
one that respects the limits on government enshrined in our
Constitution. They want policies that enhance individual freedom,
not expand government control. They believe in personal
responsibility, not government dependency.
If Republicans are not faithful to these principles, we'll be
defeated as quickly as the Democrats - and we'll deserve to be.
The Obama policies of raising taxes, explosive spending,
skyrocketing debt and government-run health care are probably
pretty familiar to you.
Let's talk about another growth killer you don't hear about as
much: The Obama energy policy and I am glad my old friend, Speaker
Newt Gingrich, also talked to you about energy.
Just as ObamaCare will increase the cost of health care, the
Obama energy policy is driving up the cost of energy ... and not by
accident. And while health care is about 18% of the economy, energy
costs affect 100% of the economy.
You remember the cap and trade tax. Well, in 2008 then-Senator
Obama told the San Francisco Chronicle, "Under my plan of a cap-
and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket."
And if Senate Republicans hadn't killed the cap and trade tax, the
electric bills for working Americans would have skyrocketed ...
except even fewer working Americans would be working today!
American manufacturing would be crushed by Obama's energy
proposals, but he hasn't given up.
His moratorium on Gulf of Mexico drilling has become a
Permatorium; more Alaskan oil is being placed off limits; the
technology - hydraulic fracturing - that makes possible the huge
increase in natural gas production from shale formations is under
attack; permits to mine coal are harder to get than a heart
transplant.
The Wall Street Journal recently reported U.S. oil production
will fall 13% this year, and that's part of the Obama strategy.
The Obama Administration is trying to achieve by regulation what it
can't pass through Congress.
In a sentence, the Obama Energy policy is this: Increase the
price of energy so Americans will use less of it. They are pursuing
that policy to reduce pollution and to make extremely expensive,
uneconomic alternative fuels cost competitive! This is not an
energy policy; it is an environmental policy.
So as gas blows by $3 a gallon on its way to four dollars and
more, remember what Energy Secretary Steven Chu said in a 2008
speech; "Somehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of
gasoline to the levels in Europe." Gasoline in Europe is $8 or $9 a
gallon.
These energy policies are catastrophic for America's economy. Such
policies would destroy our ability to compete in the global
marketplace because of cost.
What we need is more American energy!
The American worker can compete with anybody if we don't tie a
millstone around his neck, and we're not going to allow the Obama
Administration to do that through energy policy.
Fellow conservatives: 2012 will be the Year of Decision. Last
November Americans did not give the GOP a mandate to govern - they
gave us a chance to earn their trust and support. Let's make the
most of it.
As we prepare to complete our victory by winning the Senate and
the White House in 2012, let me remind you of what I said at this
conference last year, as Chairman of the Republican Governors
Association: I said if the 2010 campaigns were about issues,
Republicans would win a huge victory.
That's because the American people agree with us on the issues.
It's why they massively repudiated Obama's policies last
November.
The Left and their allies in the liberal media elite like to
describe conservatives, especially tea party activists, as out of
the mainstream ... as a bunch of unsophisticated know-nothings.
The leftish media say the tea party is a problem for
Republicans. This is a case of the Left whistling past the
graveyard.
Americans motivated to participate in the tea party movement
were upset about the very same policy issues as Republican
volunteers and leaders: Jobs and economic growth; reckless
spending, skyrocketing deficits and debt; an energy policy that
drives up energy costs and a government-run health care system that
drives up health care costs.
Rather than divide us, these are the issues that unite us as
conservatives, as Republicans ... and as Americans.
The Left refuses to admit, the average American agrees with us
on policy and issues. That is why Republican candidates last year
won the votes of Independents by some twenty points.
And if the 2012 campaign is about policy, Independents will
again join us in getting our country turned around and on the right
track, with a larger economy and a smaller government; lower taxes
and more Americans working; a falling deficit as we have more
taxpayers with more taxable income; more American energy; ObamaCare
repealed and replaced by an improved system where you and your
doctor control your healthcare choices.
We know prosperity results from an economy based on creating
wealth, not redistributing it; and if you truly care about helping
the least among us and lifting people out of poverty, history
proves you should favor a system of democratic capitalism over a
centralized, government managed economy.
If we offer this conservative vision, it will be embraced by
Main Street business owners and Walmart mothers - by American
workers, corporate executives and Mama Grizzlies - by tea party
activists, rank and file Republicans and Independent voters.
Our agenda is America's agenda and with your help, our team will
be America's team, the winning team, in 2012.
Let me close by remembering today would be the 202nd birthday of
Abraham Lincoln, father or our Party, and the first Republican
President.
Lincoln saved our country -one nation, indivisible- and he
established our Party as the Party of freedom.
So today every American is free to work hard and make the most
of his or her God-given talents; to stand equal before the law; to
pray to their own God, or no God; and to have a government that is
" of the people, by the people, and for the people" rather than a
people controlled by the government. These are the reasons Lincoln
said America was "the last, best hope on earth," and so shall she
always be.
THANK YOU, Philip, for presenting these outstanding
remarks/words. As you indicated ,
Barbour will be seen/discovered to be an extrmely viable
presidential candidate, as he has the required qualifications
[political/governmental-management experience, conservatism, etc]
needed to take on the current office holder one-on-one in political
debate. If this country can ignore the Harvardese-Massachusetts
'HAFFS', then it sould be able to do likewise with the Mississippi
'AH, SHUCKS'!!!!!!
Bill Hussein O'Stalin| 2.12.11 @ 4:08PM
Barbour is another McCain when it comes to illegal aliens. He
claims we have no chance of getting rid of them because there are
so many.
If that's true then why shouldn't everyone stop paying their
taxes since the government can't do anything about groups in excess
of 10 million.
And that's precisely what you have with illegal immigrants. Ten
to twenty million tax scofflaws who are receiving free health care
and bleeding the system in many other ways.
When I hear politicians state nothing can be done about it, they
are off my list.
Oldefarte| 2.13.11 @ 1:13PM
He intelligently believes the obvious, that it's an
impossibility to successfully round up all the illegals in this
country and deport them back to Mexico. The solution lies in
forcing them to become domumented, whereupon you discover their
whereabouts; ID card them [which cna then be used to track their
whereabouts], force them to pay taxes/fees/etc; and after a
temporary term limitation legally require them to return to Mexico
[if they haven't taken the legal steps toward citizenship by that
time]. If they were rounded up now and deported, it would be a
political nightmare and impossible to accompolish!!!!!!!
Bill Hussein O'Stalin| 2.13.11 @ 3:24PM
So the greatest country in the world has a new motto, "It can't
be done!"
As far as your tracking illegal aliens and forcing them to pay
taxes that's a joke. That's the law now and he's not for that
either and if it could be done then why couldn't it be done now?
He's for bringing them in with amnesty at first then total
citizenship. It's wrong when there are two million people on a
waiting list doing it the right way to just say that was a rule but
we can't enforce it so what the Hell. Just get enough people to
violate the law and we have a new standard. "It can't be done!" A
fitting epitaph.
PCC| 2.12.11 @ 8:16PM
Haley Barbour is smart, personable and completely
unelectable.
Oldefarte| 2.13.11 @ 1:17PM
He's electable if every intelligent taxpayer-voter gets beyond
the current POLITICAL CORRECTNESS millstone that is now hanging
over their heads. Read his speech to the CPAC, and comtemplate his
ideas/thoughts. If people like he, Palin, Bachmann, Gingrich, etc
are UNELECTABLE, then the liberal Democrats have now won the
presidency for BHO in 2012!!!!!!!!!!!
Lenny| 2.13.11 @ 1:47PM
I don't think Barbour is electable. He sounds like Boss
Hogg.
Wayne | 2.12.11 @ 10:56PM
How old is he?
Oldefarte| 2.13.11 @ 1:18PM
Approx 63!
aallensdean| 2.13.11 @ 12:07AM
My wife and two children and I live in the state of Illinois.
Our current health insurance plan is a Choice Plan that is provided
by Wise Health Insurance. The plan itself is a consumer driven
health care plan.
bee free| 2.13.11 @ 12:59AM
In this, the second POST American CPAC,
not a single mention of such trifling issues as
the REALITY of 4 decades of Globalist sellout
to the awesomely genocidal RED Chinese regime,
much less any scrutiny of rampant banksterism,
or the looming police state of 'scientific dictatorship' (THINK
EUGENICS).
KEEP GOIN' KIDS!
----football, treason and sterility!--
----JUST KEEP A GOIN'!
PattyMor| 2.13.11 @ 6:07PM
Actually Donald Trump did address the Chinese issue at CPAC. It
think "The Donald" was the only one to tackle the issue.
A true conservative would not sell out his fellow citizens for
non-citizens. The way to get rid of them is to take away their jobs
and welfare benefits. And, build secure and sensored fences on both
our borders.
Mike Rogers| 2.14.11 @ 7:51AM
He did, and the lasting impression I took away was of Ross Perot
without the squeaky voice.
This guy is a bully and a protectionist, whereas what we need is
tax and energy policies which will reverse the global flows of
money and drive up the value of the dollar.
Smoot and Hawley were not the worker's friends, and "The Donald" is
not, either
Mike Rogers| 2.14.11 @ 7:48AM
I've heard Gov Barbour in smaller settings, and he's a great
guy, but what's missing from Philip's commentary is a critique of
the governor's delivery on Saturday: Somewhat low-key, and a
tendency to speak right through natural applause breaks - rather
odd for a national figure.
Oldefarte| 2.12.11 @ 2:44PM
THANK YOU, Philip, for presenting these outstanding remarks/words. As you indicated ,
Barbour will be seen/discovered to be an extrmely viable presidential candidate, as he has the required qualifications [political/governmental-management experience, conservatism, etc] needed to take on the current office holder one-on-one in political debate. If this country can ignore the Harvardese-Massachusetts 'HAFFS', then it sould be able to do likewise with the Mississippi 'AH, SHUCKS'!!!!!!
Bill Hussein O'Stalin| 2.12.11 @ 4:08PM
Barbour is another McCain when it comes to illegal aliens. He claims we have no chance of getting rid of them because there are so many.
If that's true then why shouldn't everyone stop paying their taxes since the government can't do anything about groups in excess of 10 million.
And that's precisely what you have with illegal immigrants. Ten to twenty million tax scofflaws who are receiving free health care and bleeding the system in many other ways.
When I hear politicians state nothing can be done about it, they are off my list.
Oldefarte| 2.13.11 @ 1:13PM
He intelligently believes the obvious, that it's an impossibility to successfully round up all the illegals in this country and deport them back to Mexico. The solution lies in forcing them to become domumented, whereupon you discover their whereabouts; ID card them [which cna then be used to track their whereabouts], force them to pay taxes/fees/etc; and after a temporary term limitation legally require them to return to Mexico [if they haven't taken the legal steps toward citizenship by that time]. If they were rounded up now and deported, it would be a political nightmare and impossible to accompolish!!!!!!!
Bill Hussein O'Stalin| 2.13.11 @ 3:24PM
So the greatest country in the world has a new motto, "It can't be done!"
As far as your tracking illegal aliens and forcing them to pay taxes that's a joke. That's the law now and he's not for that either and if it could be done then why couldn't it be done now? He's for bringing them in with amnesty at first then total citizenship. It's wrong when there are two million people on a waiting list doing it the right way to just say that was a rule but we can't enforce it so what the Hell. Just get enough people to violate the law and we have a new standard. "It can't be done!" A fitting epitaph.
PCC| 2.12.11 @ 8:16PM
Haley Barbour is smart, personable and completely unelectable.
Oldefarte| 2.13.11 @ 1:17PM
He's electable if every intelligent taxpayer-voter gets beyond the current POLITICAL CORRECTNESS millstone that is now hanging over their heads. Read his speech to the CPAC, and comtemplate his ideas/thoughts. If people like he, Palin, Bachmann, Gingrich, etc are UNELECTABLE, then the liberal Democrats have now won the presidency for BHO in 2012!!!!!!!!!!!
Lenny| 2.13.11 @ 1:47PM
I don't think Barbour is electable. He sounds like Boss Hogg.
Wayne | 2.12.11 @ 10:56PM
How old is he?
Oldefarte| 2.13.11 @ 1:18PM
Approx 63!
aallensdean| 2.13.11 @ 12:07AM
My wife and two children and I live in the state of Illinois. Our current health insurance plan is a Choice Plan that is provided by Wise Health Insurance. The plan itself is a consumer driven health care plan.
bee free| 2.13.11 @ 12:59AM
In this, the second POST American CPAC,
not a single mention of such trifling issues as
the REALITY of 4 decades of Globalist sellout
to the awesomely genocidal RED Chinese regime,
much less any scrutiny of rampant banksterism,
or the looming police state of 'scientific dictatorship' (THINK EUGENICS).
KEEP GOIN' KIDS!
----football, treason and sterility!--
----JUST KEEP A GOIN'!
PattyMor| 2.13.11 @ 6:07PM
Actually Donald Trump did address the Chinese issue at CPAC. It think "The Donald" was the only one to tackle the issue.
A true conservative would not sell out his fellow citizens for non-citizens. The way to get rid of them is to take away their jobs and welfare benefits. And, build secure and sensored fences on both our borders.
Mike Rogers| 2.14.11 @ 7:51AM
He did, and the lasting impression I took away was of Ross Perot without the squeaky voice.
This guy is a bully and a protectionist, whereas what we need is tax and energy policies which will reverse the global flows of money and drive up the value of the dollar.
Smoot and Hawley were not the worker's friends, and "The Donald" is not, either
Mike Rogers| 2.14.11 @ 7:48AM
I've heard Gov Barbour in smaller settings, and he's a great guy, but what's missing from Philip's commentary is a critique of the governor's delivery on Saturday: Somewhat low-key, and a tendency to speak right through natural applause breaks - rather odd for a national figure.
Best iPhone Accessories| 2.15.11 @ 1:13AM
Someday they will come back.