The trouble with
this view of democracy promotion is that it is unfalsifiable:
if democracy doesn’t take root, that just shows we didn’t try hard
enough; if democracy takes root without liberal results, just be
patient — freedom is on the march! The sheer fact that people with
no direct connection to Saddam Hussein found Iraq a livable place
under his brutal dictatorship and now do not should tell us that
all is not well there. After a certain point, you have to look at
countries electing Islamist parties and descending into sectarian
chaos, with total catastrophe only averted by the presence of
thousands of American troops, and ask if theory meets practice.
Eventually, repeatedly invoking our successes in World War II and
the Cold War becomes an exercise in missing the point.
In the short term, there is no obvious way to both advance
American interests in Egypt and democracy for Egyptians unless you
pretend it is impossible for anti-American forces to take a bigger
role in the Egyptian government. (See McCain, John.) We’ve already
paid for some of the guns that are being fired on the protesters.
Are we sure that Egyptians want our leadership? Do they get a
say?
The United States needs to “develop a civic infrastructure of
institutions, customs, laws and societal arrangements that will
sustain democracy over the long haul” for a foreign country? Who is
going to do that? The Obama administration? Give me a break. The
only way I would support that is if I thought it would distract
them from their usual task of wrecking and bankrupting this
country. But the Bush administration seemed perfectly capable
of multitasking on the country-wrecking and bankrupting front,
so I am sure the Obama administration would prove similarly
nimble.
And that is why I don’t think a sweepingly ideological,
black-and-white approach to dealing with the world is always
helpful: because it is not always moored in reality. We have not
Facebooked and tweeted our way out of deep-seated ethnic and
religious strife in much of the world. There is very little
evidence aside from bloggers’ confident assurances that we have
even the faintest notion of what we are doing when it comes to
nation-building in the Middle East and North Africa. Egypt is the
Egyptians’ country. It belongs to them, not us. They did not vote
us their leaders. Let them shape their future, as free of our
“facilitation” as possible.
PattyMor| 2.3.11 @ 4:27PM
Its obvious that when Muslim countries have elections, they elect Islamist parties to power. Just what part of their religion do Westerners not get. These people believe in Islam and Shira Law and generally want to live under it. That is seems barbaric to us is besides the point. Its part of the religion. You never hear of "cafeteria" Muslims. As Ergodan said, Islam is Islam. Its a complete package.
Thom| 2.3.11 @ 6:10PM
Three Wolves and two Sheep discussing what is for lunch is Democracy at work, briefly.
The Founders went to some lengths to keep this Nation from dissolving into a “democracy” and suffering the results of every major attempt at Democracy going back over 3000 years. Democracy in its most basic form is nothing but MOB rule and leads to tyranny of one form or another. A Constitutional Republic is both more stable and much harder to implement thus those who are wedded to “democracy” without understanding and respecting the full scope of measures and checks on government power needed to keep the MOB out of the equation are doomed to repeat the same mistakes going back thousands of years.
An Islamic Democracy is an oxymoron at its base.