The Senate Judiciary Committee just concluded its hearing on the
constitutionality of the national health care law. There were many
illuminating points made in the roughly two and a half hour
hearing, but there was one in particular that I want to
highlight.
Michael Carvin, a lawyer at Jones Day, made the point that
there’s a key distinction between the mandate and
Congressional efforts to regulate commerce. It’s one thing for the
government to impose regulations on insurers, such as the
requirement that they cover those with pre-existing conditions, but
doing so causes a distortion in commerce. And the mandate is an
effort to “ameliorate” the distortion to the market caused by
Congress.
lol wut?| 2.2.11 @ 1:07PM
"And the mandate is an effort to "ameliorate" the distortion to the market caused by Congress."
lol wut?