In two of his posts, Guardiano invokes former President
George W.
Bush. Now I happen to believe that Bush was at his most
eloquent during his Second Inaugural
Address. A couple of years ago, when I was engaged a kitchen
table debate with my roommate's father (who is a TV reporter in
Hartford) about Bush he asked me to cite anything meaningful he
ever uttered. I replied by quoting from that speech, "When you
stand for your liberty, we will stand with you."
President Obama ought to have heeded Bush's wise counsel after
the Iranian "elections" in 2009.
There is no doubt that Egyptians want a better lot in life and
want to be able to determine their own destiny and that has been
all but impossible under Mubarak. Yet I think it is most imprudent
to downplay the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood. They are,
after all, the largest opposition group in Egypt and
the Obama Administration appears comfortable with the idea of
working with them. Yet what is
there to distinguish the Muslim Brotherhood from Hamas? Thus
under the circumstances I think conservative pessimism about Egypt
is entirely warranted and well grounded in reason.
Darn it, Aaron
The Egyptians are going to decide what happens...in EGYPT!
I am not encouraged.
Heck, we are the most educated people in the world...and look where
we are.
Yuck!
Alan Brooks| 2.1.11 @ 5:49PM
Of course there will megadeath in Egypt,
that is what happens in third world cesspools.
Visualize whirled peas.
Pete| 2.1.11 @ 1:59PM
"There is no doubt that Egyptians want a better lot in life and
want to be able to determine their own destiny and that has been
all but impossible under Mubarak. "
And such a thing is possible with whom in charge of Egypt????
I'm just asking.
David W| 2.1.11 @ 2:01PM
What was the response of your roommate's father? Did he go "Oh,
hmmm, maybe I need to rethink my opinion of President Bush?" or did
he say something typically liberally....?
Derek Leaberry| 2.1.11 @ 2:35PM
$ 4+ a gallon gasoline should bring glee to Republicans for
2012. Now if a decent conservative would run, that would be icing
on the cake.
USAttorney| 2.1.11 @ 3:16PM
@ Derek
I see a great R. Perry/N. Gingrich ticket if they could put aside
ego, and a great oddball ticket of M. Romney/H. Barbour.
Thoughts?
@Ken
I have to agree with you
Mr. Goldstone may have some bias. Is there a pro-semitism label
to counter anti-semitic? See the Hamas reference. We Americans are
always trying to put things in boxes: Well, you see the Supreme
Leader is like Pope-King and the President is like a C.E.O.
and...No, these titles and roles are different but we generally
make token effort to appreciate the differences. Some things cannot
be related functionally to something familiar. Even the idea of
democracy has nuances from Greece to Britain to the U.S. We should
come out strongly in favor of the rule of law while encouraging
Mubarek behind the scenes to announce his promise not to seek
another term. Stable transition in place to our version of
democratic governance (they have had elections you know), and time
to build secular leaders for the opposition.
As far as I know, he is not a non-interventionist.
Derek Leaberry| 2.2.11 @ 3:29PM
I would be displeased with all three. If any of the three was to
receive the Republican nomination, I would extend my streak of not
voting for the Republican presidential candidate to six
elections.
Occam's Tool| 2.1.11 @ 6:03PM
The term is for pro-semitism is philo-semitism. Like Anglophile
or Francophile.
Ken (Old Texican)| 2.1.11 @ 1:46PM
Darn it, Aaron
The Egyptians are going to decide what happens...in EGYPT!
I am not encouraged.
Heck, we are the most educated people in the world...and look where we are.
Yuck!
Alan Brooks| 2.1.11 @ 5:49PM
Of course there will megadeath in Egypt,
that is what happens in third world cesspools.
Visualize whirled peas.
Pete| 2.1.11 @ 1:59PM
"There is no doubt that Egyptians want a better lot in life and want to be able to determine their own destiny and that has been all but impossible under Mubarak. "
And such a thing is possible with whom in charge of Egypt???? I'm just asking.
David W| 2.1.11 @ 2:01PM
What was the response of your roommate's father? Did he go "Oh, hmmm, maybe I need to rethink my opinion of President Bush?" or did he say something typically liberally....?
Derek Leaberry| 2.1.11 @ 2:35PM
$ 4+ a gallon gasoline should bring glee to Republicans for 2012. Now if a decent conservative would run, that would be icing on the cake.
USAttorney| 2.1.11 @ 3:16PM
@ Derek
I see a great R. Perry/N. Gingrich ticket if they could put aside ego, and a great oddball ticket of M. Romney/H. Barbour. Thoughts?
@Ken
I have to agree with you
Mr. Goldstone may have some bias. Is there a pro-semitism label to counter anti-semitic? See the Hamas reference. We Americans are always trying to put things in boxes: Well, you see the Supreme Leader is like Pope-King and the President is like a C.E.O. and...No, these titles and roles are different but we generally make token effort to appreciate the differences. Some things cannot be related functionally to something familiar. Even the idea of democracy has nuances from Greece to Britain to the U.S. We should come out strongly in favor of the rule of law while encouraging Mubarek behind the scenes to announce his promise not to seek another term. Stable transition in place to our version of democratic governance (they have had elections you know), and time to build secular leaders for the opposition.
Red Phillips| 2.1.11 @ 4:54PM
USAttorney, I don't think you know Mr. Leaberry very well if you think he would be happy with Perry, Gingrich or Romney. But I'll let him answer.
Alan Brooks| 2.1.11 @ 5:52PM
Who do you want for president, Red? David Duke?
He's tanned, rested, and ready.
Red Phillips| 2.1.11 @ 6:27PM
You know who I want to be President Alan, Ron Paul.
Occam's Tool| 2.1.11 @ 6:04PM
What's wrong with Perry?
Red Phillips| 2.1.11 @ 6:28PM
As far as I know, he is not a non-interventionist.
Derek Leaberry| 2.2.11 @ 3:29PM
I would be displeased with all three. If any of the three was to receive the Republican nomination, I would extend my streak of not voting for the Republican presidential candidate to six elections.
Occam's Tool| 2.1.11 @ 6:03PM
The term is for pro-semitism is philo-semitism. Like Anglophile or Francophile.